How Do Firms Feel About Participation by Their Peers in the Regulatory Design Process? An Online Survey Experiment Testing the Substantive Change and Spillover Mechanisms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2019.0084

References

  • Ayres I, Braithwaite J (1994) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford University Press on Demand, New York).Google Scholar
  • Baldwin R, Black J (2008) Really responsive regulation. Modern Law Rev. 71(1):59–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balla SJ (1998) Administrative procedures and political control of the bureaucracy. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 92(3):663–673.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackburn RA, Hart M (2002) Small Firms’ Awareness and Knowledge of Individual Employment Rights (Department of Trade and Industry, London).Google Scholar
  • Blackwell M, Honaker J, King G (2017) A unified approach to measurement error and missing data: Overview and applications. Sociol. Methods Res. 46(3):303–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bosse D, Phillips R (2016) Agency theory and bounded self-interest. Acad. Management Rev. 41(2):276–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1975) Polluters’ profits and political response: Direct controls versus taxes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 65(1):139–147.Google Scholar
  • Busch P-O, Jörgens H, Tews K (2005) The global diffusion of regulatory instruments: The making of a new international environmental regime. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 598(1):146–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coen D (2005) Business–regulatory relations: Learning to play regulatory games in European utility markets. Governance (Oxford) 18(3):375–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins JD, Uhlenbruck K, Rodriguez P (2009) Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 87(1):89–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dal Bó E (2006) Regulatory capture: A review. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 22(2):203–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WP (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, vol. 17 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Farrell H, Newman AL (2014) Domestic institutions beyond the nation-state: Charting the new interdependence approach. World Politics 66(2):331–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishkin JS, He B, Luskin RC, Siu A (2010) Deliberative democracy in an unlikely place: Deliberative polling in China. British J. Political Sci. 40(2):435–448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fitzpatrick P, Sinclair AJ (2003) Learning through public involvement in environmental assessment hearings. J. Environ. Management 67(2):161–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fung A, Wright EO (2001) Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics Soc. 29(1):5–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gay C (2002) Spirals of trust? The effect of descriptive representation on the relationship between citizens and their government. Amer. J. Political Sci. 46(4):717–732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gillespie J (2008) Localizing global rules: Public participation in lawmaking in Vietnam. Law Soc. Inquiry 33(3):673–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaeser EL, Shleifer A (2003) The rise of the regulatory state. J. Econom. Literature 41(2):401–425.Google Scholar
  • Glaeser E, Johnson S, Shleifer A (2001) Coase versus the Coasians. Quart. J. Econom. 116(3):853–899.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodin RE, Dryzek JS (2006) Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics Soc. 34(2):219–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodrick E, Salancik GR (1996) Organizational discretion in responding to institutional practices: Hospitals and cesarean births. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hassel A (2008) The evolution of a global labor governance regime. Governance (Oxford) 21(2):231–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatcher A, Jaffry S, Thébaud O, Bennett E (2000) Normative and social influences affecting compliance with fishery regulations. Land Econom. 76(3):448–461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He B, Warren ME (2011) Authoritarian deliberation: The deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspect. Politics 9(2):269–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hellman JS, Jones G, Kaufmann D (2003) Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies. J. Comparative Econom. 31(4):751–773.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman AJ, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman AJ, Keim GD, Schuler D (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
  • International Labor Organization (2015) Small and medium-sized enterprises and decent and productive employment creation. ILO Conference, 104th Session, Geneva.Google Scholar
  • Jordana J, Levi-Faur D (2004) The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (2005) Social Learning in Environmental Management: Toward a Sustainable Future (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kim WC, Mauborgne R (1998) Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management J. 19(4):323–338.Google Scholar
  • Kreuger A (1974) The political economy of the rent-seeking society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 2(1):291–303.Google Scholar
  • Krisch N, Kingsbury B (2006) Introduction: Global governance and global administrative law in the international legal order. Eur. J. Internat. Law 17(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kroszner R (1998) On the political economy of banking and financial regulatory reform in emerging markets. CRSP Working Paper No. 472, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1991) The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1089–1127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawton T, McGuire S, Rajwani T (2013) Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda. Internat. J. Management Rev. 15(1):86–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lupia A (1994) Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 88(1):63–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Makkai T, Braithwaite J (1996) Procedural justice and regulatory compliance. Law Human Behav. 20(1):83–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malesky E (2017) The Vietnam Provincial Competitiveness Index: Measuring Economic Governance for Private Sector Development 2016 (Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Hanoi, Vietnam).Google Scholar
  • Malesky E, Taussig M (2017) The danger of not listening to firms: Government responsiveness and the goal of regulatory compliance. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1741–1770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malesky E, Taussig M (2018) Participation, government legitimacy, and regulatory compliance: A firm level field experiment in Vietnam. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 113(2):530–551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mallon R, Van Arkadie B (2013) Viet Nam—A transition tiger? (ANU Press, Canberra, ACT, Australia).Google Scholar
  • Marquis C, Raynard M (2015) Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):291–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mattli W, Büthe T (2003) Setting international standards: Technological rationality or primacy of power? World Politics 56(1):1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2000) Small and medium-sized enterprises: Local strength, global reach. OECD Observer Policy Brief (June 2000), http://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/1918307.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Peltzman S (1976) Toward a more general theory of regulation. J. Law Econom. 19(2):211–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posner RA (1974) Theories of economic regulation. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 5(2):335–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Przeworski A, Stokes SC, Manin B (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Radaelli CM, De Francesco F (2013) Regulatory Quality in Europe: Concepts, Measures and Policy Processes (Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK).Google Scholar
  • Rosenfeld B, Imai K, Shapiro JN (2016) An empirical validation study of popular survey methodologies for sensitive questions. Amer. J. Political Sci. 60(3):783–802.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sappington DE, Stiglitz JE (1987) Information and Regulation. Bailey, EE, ed. Public Regulation: New Perspectives on Institutions and Policies (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–43.Google Scholar
  • Saward M (2006) The representative claim. Contemporary Political Theory 5(3):297–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spiller PT (1990) Politicians, interest groups, and regulators: A multiple-principals agency theory of regulation, or let them be bribed. J. Law Econom. 33(1):65–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stern MJ (2008) Coercion, voluntary compliance and protest: The role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas. Environ. Conservation 35(3):200–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler GJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 2(1):3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stromseth JR, Malesky EJ, Gueorguiev DD (2017) China’s Governance Puzzle: Enabling Transparency and Participation in a Single-Party State (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tenev S, Carlier A, Chaudry O, Nguyen Q-T (2003) Informality and the Playing Field in Vietnam’s Business Sector (World Bank Publications, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Transparency International (2018) Corruption Perceptions Index 2017. Accessed August 29, 2018, https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2017.Google Scholar
  • Truex R (2014) Consultative authoritarianism and its limits. Comparative Political Stud. 50(3):329–361.Google Scholar
  • Tyler TR (2006) Why People Obey the Law (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urbinati N, Warren ME (2008) The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 11:387–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viscusi KW, Zeckhauser RJ (1979) Optimal standards with incomplete enforcement. Public Policy 26(4):437–456.Google Scholar
  • Winter SC, May PJ (2001) Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations. J. Policy Anal. Management 20(4):675–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • World Bank (2017) World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law (World Bank Publications, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • World Economic Forum (2018) Competitiveness Rankings 2015-16. Accessed August 29, 2018, http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016/rankings/.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.