Dynamics in the Origins of Technological Knowledge in Early Firm Years: Implications for New Product Introductions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2019.0089

References

  • Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Ruef M (2006) Organizations Evolving, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–918.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida P, Dokko G, Rosenkopf L (2003) Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Res. Policy 32(2):301–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano M, Bond SR (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arora A, Belenzon S, Rios LA (2014) Make, buy, organize: the interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Strategic Management J. 35:317–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron JN, Burton MD, Hannan MT (1996) The road taken: origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Industrial Corporate Change 5(2):239–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Burton MD (2008) Founding the future: path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. 19(1):3–24.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bosma N, Levie J (2009) Global entrepreneurship monitor – 2009 global report. Report, Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, London.Google Scholar
  • Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2):198–213.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(2):223–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton MD (2001) The company they keep: founders’ models for organizing new firms. Schoonhoven CB, Romanelli E, eds. The Entrepreneurship Dynamic – Origins of Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Industries (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J, Thompson P (2015) New firm performance and the replacement of founder-CEOs. Strategic Enterprise J. 9(3):243–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough H (2003) Open Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
  • Colombo LG, Grilli L (2005) Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: a competence-based view. Res. Policy 34(6):795–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cotropia CA, Lemley MA, Sampat B (2013) Do applicant patent citations matter? Res. Policy 42(4):844–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dencker JC, Gruber M (2015) The effects of opportunities and founder experience on new firm performance. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1035–1052.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dencker JC, Gruber M, Shah SK (2009) Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organ. Sci. 20(3):516–537.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D (1992) A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):77–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. 21(3):345–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fauchart E, Gruber M (2011) Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: the role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 54(5):935–957.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fern MJ, Cardinal LB, O’Neill HM (2012) The genesis of strategy in new ventures: escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge. Strategic Management J. 33(4):427–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N, Shah S (2003) How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res. Policy 32(1):157–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19(12):1193–1201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2013) Escaping the prior knowledge corridor: What shapes the number and variety of market opportunities identified before market entry of technology start-ups? Organ. Sci. 24(1):280–300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Håkanson L (2007) Creating knowledge: the power and logic of articulation. Industrial Corporate Change 16(1):51–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hashai N (2015) Within-industry diversification and firm performance—an S-shaped hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 36(9):1378–1400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C, Raubitschek RS (2000) Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities, and products. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):961–979.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. 2(1):88–115.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Management J. 21(3):217–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan SN, Sensoy BA, Strömberg P (2009) Should investors bet on the jockey or the horse? Evidence from the evolution of firms from early business plans to public companies. J. Finance 64(1):75–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kazanjian RK (1988) Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Acad. Management J. 31(2):257–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirzner IM (1985) Discovery and the Capitalist Process (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laursen K, Leone MI, Torrisi S (2010) Technological exploration through licensing: New insights from the licensee point of view. Industrial Corporate Change 19(3):871–897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liebeskind JP (1996) Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):93–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mallapragada G, Grewal R, Lilien G (2012) User-generated open source products: Founder’s social capital and time to product release. Marketing Sci. 31(3):474–492.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and inter-firm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 17(52):77–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm: the problem solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Phelps CC (2010) A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Acad. Management J. 53(4):890–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riggs W, von Hippel E (1996) Incentives to innovate and the sources of innovation: the case of scientific instruments. Res. Policy 23(4):459–469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ronstadt R (1988) The corridor principle. J. Bus. Venturing 3(1):31–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad. Management J. 50(2):364–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian AL (1994) Regional Advantage (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, 7th printing (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Senor D, Singer S (2009) Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle (Twelve, Hachette Book Group, New York).Google Scholar
  • Shan W (1990) An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high-technology firms. Strategic Management J. 11(2):129–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. 11(4):448–469.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith KG, Collins CJ, Clark KD (2005) Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Acad. Management J. 48(2):346–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):81–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stern I, Henderson AD (2004) Within-business diversification in technology-intensive industries. Strategic Management J. 25(5):487–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21(8):791–811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E (1976) The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Res. Policy 5(3):212–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E (1988) The Sources of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Von Krogh G, Ichijo K, Nonaka I (2000) Enabling Knowledge Creation – How to Unlock the Mysteries of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman N (2003) Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organ. Sci. 14(2):149–172.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman N (2016) The throne vs. the kingdom: founder control and value creation in startups. Strategic Management J. 38(2):255–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza HJ (2001) Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management J. 22(6-7):587–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zander I (2007) Do you see what I mean? An entrepreneurship perspective on the nature and boundaries of the firm. J. Management Stud. 44(7):1141–1164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zander I, Zander U (2005) The inside track – On the important (but neglected) role of customers in the resource-based view of strategy and firm growth. J. Management Stud. 42(8):1519–1548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou KZ, Li CB (2012) How knowledge affects radical innovation: knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1090–1102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.