Interdependence, Complementarity, and Ruggedness of Performance Landscapes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2019.0090

References

  • Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. 80(7):40–47.Google Scholar
  • Adner R, Csaszar FA, Zemsky PB (2014) Positioning on a multiattribute landscape. Management Sci. 60(11):2794–2815.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arkes HR, Blumer C (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 35(1):124–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arora A, Gambardella A (1990) Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. J. Indust. Econom. 38(4):361–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Stern S (1998) An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. NBER Working Paper 6600, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JAC, Korn HJ, Kotha S (1995) Dominant designs and population dynamics in telecommunications services: Founding and failure of facsimile transmission service organizations, 1965–1992. Soc. Sci. Res. 24(2):97–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumann O, Siggelkow N (2013) Dealing with complexity: Integrated vs. chunky search processes. Organ. Sci. 24(1):116–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baumann O, Schmidt J, Stieglitz N (2019) Effective search in rugged performance landscapes: A review and outlook. J. Management 45(1):285–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: the evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Black SE, Lynch LM (2001) How to compete: the impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 83(3):434–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Brynjolfsson E, Foster L, Jarmin R, Patnaik M, Saporta-Eksten I, Van Reenen J (2019) What drives differences in management practices? Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(5):1648–1683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Milgrom P (2013) Complementarity in organizations. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 11–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cassiman B, Colombo M, Garrone P, Veugelers R (2005) The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological-and market-relatedness. Res. Policy 34(2):195–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G, Dunbar RLM, Shapira Z (2017) How commitment to craftsmanship leads to unique value: Steinway & Sons’ differentiation strategy. Strategy Sci. 2(1):13–38.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Christensen CM, Suárez FF, Utterback JM (1998) Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Sci. 44(12):S207–S220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delaney JT, Huselid MA (1996) The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Acad. Management J. 39(4):949–969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Dosi G, Marengo L (1999) The co-evolution of technological knowledge and corporate organizations. Gambardella A, Malerba F, eds. The Organization of Economic Innovation in Europe (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 15–23.Google Scholar
  • Drazin R, Vandeven AH (1986) Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(4):514–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durand R, Khaire M (2017) Where do market categories come from and how? Distinguishing category creation from category emergence. J. Management 43(1):87–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ennen E, Richter A (2010) The whole is more than the sum of its parts—or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. J. Management 36(1):207–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2004) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Helfat CE, Marengo L (2017) Searching, shaping, and the quest for superior performance. Strategy Sci. 2(3):194–209.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R, Henderson R (2012) Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1350–1364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R (1995) Of life cycles real and imaginary: The unexpectedly long old age of optical lithography. Res. Policy 24(4):631–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):291–313.Google Scholar
  • Kaufmann S (1993) The Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S (1997) Industry life cycles. Indust. Corporate Change 6(1):145–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P, Lorsch J (1967) Organization and Environment (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Lee C, Venkatraman N, Tanriverdi H, Iyer B (2010) Complementarity‐based hypercompetition in the software industry: Theory and empirical test, 1990–2002. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1431–1456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lenox MJ, Rockart SF, Lewin AY (2006) Interdependency, competition, and the distribution of firm and industry profits. Management Sci. 52(5):757–772.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D (2000) Organizational capabilities in complex worlds. Dosi G, Nelson R, Winter S, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (Oxford University Press, New York), 363–379.Google Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (2011) A behavioral approach to strategy: What’s the alternative? Strategic Management J. 32(13):1517–1523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, Posen HE (2007) Myopia of selection: Does organizational adaptation limit the efficacy of population selection? Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):586–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, Workiewicz M (2018) When two bosses are better than one: Nearly decomposable systems and organizational adaptation. Organ. Sci. 29(2):207–224.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liebowitz S, Margolis S (1995) Path dependence, lock-in, and history. J. Law Econom. Organ. 11(1):205–226.Google Scholar
  • Lippman SA, Rumelt RP (1982) Uncertain imitability—An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):418–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macduffie JP (1995) Human-resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 48(2):197–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marengo L, Dosi G, Legrenzi P, Pasquali C (2000) The structure of problem-solving knowledge and the structure of organizations. Indust. Corporate Change 9(4):757–788.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Matsuyama K (1997) Economic Development as Coordination Problems (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • McGregor D (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational-change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2–3):179–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D (1986) Configurations of strategy and structure: Toward a synthesis. Strategic Management J. 7(3):233–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milliken FJ (1987) Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):133–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murmann JP, Frenken K (2006) Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Res. Policy 35(7):925–952.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narduzzo A, Rocco E, Warglien M (2000) Talking about routines in the field. Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 27–50.Google Scholar
  • Peltoniemi M (2011) Reviewing industry life-cycle theory: Avenues for future research. Internat. J. Management Rev. 13(4):349–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pil FK, MacDuffie JP (1996) The adoption of high-involvement work practices. Indust. Relations 35(3):423–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter ME (1998) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Free Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M, Siggelkow N (2008) Contextuality within activity systems and sustainability of competitive advantage. Acad. Management Perspect. 22(2):34–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quigley TJ, Hambrick DC (2015) Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America’s attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management J. 36(6):821–830.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Repenning NP, Sterman JD (2002) Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):265–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (2001) Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. 12(3):274–293.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. 53(7):1068–1085.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J (2004) The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J, Saloner G (2013) Strategy and organization. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 799–850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbloom RS, Cusumano MA (1987) Technological pioneering and competitive advantage: The birth of the VCR industry. Calif. Management Rev. 29(4):51–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shephard RW (1970) Theory of Cost and Production Functions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2001) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. 44(4):838–857.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2002a) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):125–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2002b) Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Sci. 48(7):900–916.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2011) Firms as systems of interdependent choices. J. Management Stud. 48(5):1126–1140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2009) Hiding the evidence of valid theories: How coupled search processes obscure performance differences among organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):602–634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
  • Sorenson O, Rivkin JW, Fleming L (2006) Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res. Policy 35(7):994–1017.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suarez FF (2004) Battles for technological dominance: An integrative framework. Res. Policy 33(2):271–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suárez FF, Utterback JM (1995) Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management J. 16(6):415–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Syverson C (2011) What determines productivity? J. Econom. Literature 49(2):326–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Topkis DM (1978) Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Oper. Res. 26(2):305–321.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wade J (1995) Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market. Strategic Management J. 16(S1):113–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1991) The Machine That Changed the World: How Japan’s Secret Weapon in the Global Auto Wars Will Revolutionize Western Industry, 1st Harper ed. (HarperPerennial, New York).Google Scholar
  • Zollo M (2009) Superstitious learning with rare strategic decisions: Theory and evidence from corporate acquisitions. Organ. Sci. 20(5):894–908.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.