Cognitive and Structural Antecedents of Innovation: A Large-Sample Study

References

• Adner R, Helfat CE (2003) Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10):1011–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Snow D (2010) Old technology responses to new technology threats: Demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Indust. Corporate Change 19(5):1655–1675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appfigures (2017) Share of free and paid mobile game apps on Google Play Store as of December 2016. Accessed December 4, 2017, https://www.statista.com/statistics/673464/free-paid-mobile-games-andro-share/.Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. 10(S1):107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bethke E (2003) Game Development and Production (Wordware Publishing, Inc., Plano, TX).Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Boh WF, Evaristo R, Ouderkirk A (2014) Balancing breadth and depth of expertise for innovation: A 3M story. Res. Policy 43(2):349–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2002) Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. 45(5):875–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns TE, Stalker GM (1961) The Management of Innovation (Tavistock Publications, London, UK).Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B (2004) Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit (Springer, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carzo R, Yanouzas JN (1969) Effects of flat and tall organization structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. 14(2):178–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chase WG, Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psych. 4(1):55–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom RS (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin‐off companies. Indust. Corporate Change 11(3):529–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi MTH, Glaser R, Farr MJ (1988) The Nature of Expertise (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Rosenbloom RS (1995) Explaining the attacker’s advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Res. Policy 24(2):233–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, McDonald R, Altman EJ, Palmer JE (2018) Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. J. Management Stud. 55(7):1043–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craik KJW (1943) The Nature of Explanation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Crocker J, Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1984) Schematic bases of belief change. Eiser JR, ed. Attitudinal Judgment (Springer, New York), 197–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management J. 33(6):611–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2014) How organizational structure can compensate for flawed mental representations. Working paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategic representations. Strategy Sci. 3(4):606–619.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Laureiro-Martinez D (2018) Individual and organizational antecedents of strategic foresight: A representational approach. Strategy Sci. 3(3):513–532.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dane E (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):579–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Duncker K, Lees LS (1945) On problem-solving. Psych. Monographs 58(5):i–113.Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA, Lehmann AC (1996) Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Rev. Psych. 47(1):273–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster RN (1986) Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage (Summit Books, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fried I (2015) Mobile apps have a short half life: Use falls sharply after first six months. Vox (September 2), https://www.vox.com/2015/9/2/11618236/mobile-apps-have-a-short-half-life-use-falls-sharply-after-first-six.Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1973) Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gans J (2016) The Disruption Dilemma (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glueck WF (1972) Business Policy: Strategy Formation and Management Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Goodman D (2016) Clash of Clans maker Supercell lifted by strength in Asia. Reuters (March 9), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-supercell-results/clash-of-clans-maker-supercell-lifted-by-strength-in-asia-idUSKCN0WB16L.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Cho TS, Chen MJ (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):659–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamel G (2011) First, let’s fire all the managers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(12):48–60.Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM (1998) The failure of established firms in the face of technical change: A study of photolithographic alignment equipment. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Tyler BB (1991) Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management J. 12(5):327–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hrebiniak LG, Joyce WF (1984) Implementing Strategy (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Jacoby J (1984) Perspectives on information overload. J. Consumer Res. 10(4):432–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird PN (1980) Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Sci. 4(1):71–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge A (2015) Shaking it up: The making of Candy Crush Soda Saga. Pocket Gamer Biz (January 7), http://www.pocketgamer.biz/feature/60598/the-making-of-candy-crush-soda-saga.Google Scholar
• Keum DD, See KE (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.Link, Google Scholar
• King AA, Tucci CL (2002) Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. 48(2):171–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Kutner MH, Nachtsheim C, Neter J (2004) Applied Linear Regression Models (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Lanzolla G, Suarez FF (2012) Closing the technology adoption-use divide: The role of contiguous user bandwagon. J. Management 38(3):836–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1995) Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liming D, Vilorio D (2011) Work for play: Careers in video game development. Occupational Outlook Quart. 55(3):2–11.Google Scholar
• Luban P (2011) The design of free-to-play games: Part 1. Gamasutra (November 22), https://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/134920/the_design_of_freetoplay_games_.php.Google Scholar
• Makuch E (2015) Fable Legends free-to-play model isn’t ‘evil,’ dev says. Gamespot (March 31), http://www.gamespot.com/articles/fable-legends-free-to-play-model-isn-t-evil-dev-sa/1100-6426296.Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2012) People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1001–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore B (2015) Free-to-play is coming to consoles (don’t panic). Wired (March 20), https://www.wired.com/2015/03/free-to-play-consoles.Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human Problem Solving (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J (2018) Creating and capturing value from freemium business models: A demand‐side perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 12(2):171–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1986) The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):716–727.Google Scholar
• Schank RC (1995) Tell Me a Story: Narrative and Intelligence (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Vidal P, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A (2003) Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. 49(1):39–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Schwenk CR (1984) Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management J. 5(2):111–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seshadri S, Shapira Z (2003) The flow of ideas and timing of evaluation as determinants of knowledge creation. Indust. Corporate Change 12(5):1099–1124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard RN (1978) The mental image. Amer. Psychologist 33(2):125–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2):101–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1997) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, 4th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sinclair B (2016) Mobile games lifecycle shortening. GamesIndustry.biz (January 20), http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-01-20-mobile-games-lifecycle-shortening-app-annie.Google Scholar
• Streufert SC (1973) Effects of information relevance on decision making in complex environments. Memory Cognition 1(3):224–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundman Y (2015) How we developed Candy Crush Soda Saga. Crisp (blog) (May 20), https://blog.crisp.se/2015/05/20/yassalsundman/how-we-developed-candy-crush-soda-saga.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson VA (1965) Bureaucracy and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 10(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. 38(4):8–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback JM (1971) The process of technological innovation within the firm. Acad. Management J. 14(1):75–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback JM (1994) Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Vogt WP, Vogt ER, Gardner DC, Haeffele LM (2014) Selecting the Right Analyses for Your Data: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Zaltman G, Duncan R, Holbek J (1973) Innovations & Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Zott C, Amit R, Massa L (2011) The business model: Recent developments and future research. J. Management 37(4):1019–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar