The Ecology of Management Concepts

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2020.0108

References

  • Abrahamson E (1996) Managerial fashion. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):254–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abrahamson E, Eisenman M (2008) Employee-management techniques: Transient fads or trending fashions? Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):719–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abrahamson E, Fairchild G (1999) Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):708–740.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D (2010) You are what you measure. Harvard Bus. Rev. (June), https://hbr.org/2010/06/column-you-are-what-you-measure.Google Scholar
  • Armour H, Teece D (1978) Organizational structure and economic performance: A test of the multidivisional hypothesis. Bell J. Econom. 9(1):106–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S, Kunda G (1992) Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):363–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Le Mens G (2009) How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(20):8146–8150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Sorensen A, Rasmussen S (2010) Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Sci. 29(5):815–827.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blumer H (1969) Fashion: From class differentiation to collective selection. Sociol. Quart. 10(3):275–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bothner M (2003) Competition and social influence: The diffusion of the sixth-generation processor in the global computer industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(6):1175–1210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Burt RS (1987) Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion vs. structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(6):1287–1335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnabuci G (2010) The ecology of technological progress: How symbiosis and competition affect the growth of technology domains. Soc. Forces 88(5):2163–2187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carson P, Lanier P, Carson K, Guidry B (2000) Clearing a path through the management fashion jungle: Some preliminary trailblazing. Acad. Management J. 43(6):1143–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler AD Jr (1962) Strategy and Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Cialdini R, Borden R, Thorne A, Walker M, Freeman S, Sloan L (1976) Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 34(3):366–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole RE (1989) Strategies for Learning: Small-Group Activities in American, Japanese, and Swedish Industry (University of California Press, Berkeley).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David R, Strang D (2006) When fashion is fleeting: Transitory collective beliefs and the dynamics of TQM consulting. Acad. Management J. 49(2):215–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G (1991) Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(4):583–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Greve HR (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse DL (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2):147–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, Kovács B (2008) Selective sampling of empirical settings in organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1):109–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, Kovács B (2015) The effect of selection bias in studies of fads and fashions. PLoS One 10(4):e0123471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deutsch M, Gerard H (1955) A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 51(3):629–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fast N, Heath C, Wu G (2009) Common ground and cultural prominence: How conversation reinforces culture. Psych. Sci. 20(7):904–911.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L, Schachter S, Back KW (1963) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Goldberg A (2011) Mapping shared understandings using relational class analysis: The case of the cultural omnivore reexamined. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(5):1397–1436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(6):1420–1443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H (1995) Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):447–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haans RF (2019) What’s the value of being different when everyone is? The effects of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous vs. heterogeneous categories. Strategic Management J. 40(1):3–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT (2010) Partiality of memberships in categories and audiences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:159–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Carroll GR (1992) Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Polos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Baron JN, Hsu G, Koçak Ö (2006) Organizational identities and the hazard of change. Indust. Corporate Change 15(5):755–784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Le Mens G, Hsu G, Kovács B, Negro G, Pólos L, Pontikes E, Sharkey AJ (2019) Concepts and Categories: Foundations for Sociological and Cultural Analysis (Columbia University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P, Miner A (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(2):420–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource practices on manufacturing performance: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 57(3):291–313.Google Scholar
  • Jaccard P (1901) Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des alpes et du jura. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Fingerprinting Plants Fungi 57(140):547–579.Google Scholar
  • Kennedy M (2008) Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(2):270–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kieser A (2002) Managers as marionettes? Using fashion theories to explain the success of consultancies. Kipping M, Engwall L, eds. Management Consulting: Emergence and Dynamics of a Knowledge Industry (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom),167–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovács B, Hannan MT (2015) Conceptual spaces and the consequences of category spanning. Sociol. Sci. 13(2):252–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler E, Mohrman S, Benson G (2001) Organizing for High Performance (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Lieberson S (2000) A Matter of Taste: How Names, Fashions, and Culture Change (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Mahajan V, Peterson R (1985) Models for Innovation Diffusion (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden PV, Friedkin NE (1993) Network studies of social influence. Sociol. Methods Res. 22(1):127–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson M (1983) An ecology of affiliation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(4):519–532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2):179–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Phys. 46(5):323–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical refinement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J, Stuart T (1995) A role-based ecology of technological change. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(5):1224–1260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pontikes EG (2018) Category strategy for firm advantage. Strategy Sci. 3(4):620–631.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toqueville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(4):795–843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ruef M (2000) The emergence of organizational forms: A community ecology approach. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):658–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rumelt RP, Schendel DE, Teece DJ (1994) Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Salganik M, Dodds P, Watts D (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling TC (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior (Norton, New York).Google Scholar
  • Shaver JM (2019) Interpreting interactions in linear fixed-effect regression models: When fixed-effect estimates are no longer within-effects. Strategy Sci. 4(1):25–40.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D, Macy MW (2001) In Search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):147–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D, Soule SA (1998) Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:265–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D, David RJ, Akhlaghpour S (2014) Coevolution in management fashion: An agent-based model of consultant-driven innovation. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(1):226–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T, Hoang H, Hybels R (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts DJ (2002) A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(9):5766–5771.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (1999) Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. J. Econometrics 90(1):77–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao EY, Fisher G, Lounsbury M, Miller D (2017) Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 38(1):93–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Google Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (2016) Optimal distinctiveness revisited. Pratt M, Schultz M, Ashfort B, Ravasi D, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom), 183–199.Google Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW, Kim T-Y, Ukanwa K, Rittmann Jv (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1075.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.