Problem-Solving or Self-Enhancing? Influences of Diversification and Bright Spot on Corporate Resource Allocation Responses to Performance Shortfalls

References

• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Alessandri TM, Seth A (2014) The effects of managerial ownership on international and business diversification: Balancing incentives and risks. Strategic Management J. 35(13):2064–2075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman EI (1983) ‘Why businesses fail.’ J. Bus. Strategy 3(4):15–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Brion S (2007) Reluctant to change: Self-enhancing responses to diverging performance measures. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(2):255–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Greve HR (2006) Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. 52(1):83–94.Link, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Brion S, Greve HR (2015) Self-assessment, self-enhancement, and the choice of comparison organizations for evaluating organizational performance. Gavetti G, Ocasio W, eds. Cognition and Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 32 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 89–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardolet D, Brown, Lovallo D (2017) The effects of relative size, profitability, and growth on corporate capital allocations. J. Management 43(8):2469–2496.Google Scholar
• Bardolet D, Fox CR, Lovallo D (2011) Corporate capital allocation: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1465–1483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardolet D, Lovallo D, Rumelt R (2010) The hand of corporate management in capital allocations: Patterns of investment in multi-and single-business firms. Indust. Corporate Change 19(2):591–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benito-Osorio D, Ángel Guerras-Martín L, Ángel Zuñiga-Vicente J (2012) Four decades of research on product diversification: A literature review. Management Decision 50(2):325–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blagoeva R, Mom TJ, Jansen JJ, George G (2019) Problem-solving or self-enhancement? Power perspective on how CEOs affect R&D search in the face of inconsistent feedback. Acad. Management J. 63(2):332–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campa JM, Kedia S (2002) Explaining the diversification discount. J. Finance 57(4):1731–1762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caves RE (1996) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Chang SJ (1996) An evolutionary perspective on diversification and corporate restructuring: Entry, exit, and economic performance during 1981–89. Strategic Management J. 17(8):587–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC (2007) It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):351–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen WR, Miller KD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management J. 28(4):369–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Datta DK, Rajagopalan N, Rasheed AMA (1991) Diversification and performance: Critical review and future directions. J. Management Stud. 28(5):529–558.Google Scholar
• Dawson JF (2014) Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. J. Bus. Psych. 29(2014):1–19.Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Suh JH (2019) Experience and behavior: How negative feedback in new vs. experienced domains affects firm action and subsequent performance. Acad. Management J. 62(2):309–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flannery MJ, Hankins KW (2013) Estimating dynamic panel models in corporate finance. J. Corporate Finance 19(2013):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredrickson JW, Davis-Blake A, Sanders WMG (2010) Sharing the wealth: Social comparisons and pay dispersion in the CEO’s top team. Strategic Management J. 31(10):1031–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Joseph J (2013) Corporate structure and performance feedback, Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1102–1119.Link, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2000) Econometric Analysis, International ed. (Pearson, New York).Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003a) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations, Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003b) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M, Raviv A (1996) The capital budgeting process: Incentives and information. J. Finance 51(4):1139–1174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD (1994) A mid-range theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance. J. Management 20(2):297–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Kim H (1997) International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Acad. Management J. 40(4):767–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoaglin DC, Iglewicz B (1987) Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82(400):1147–1149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoaglin DC, Iglewicz B, Tukey JW (1986) Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81(396):991–999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA (1990) Antecedents and performance outcomes of diversification: A review and critique of theoretical perspectives. J. Management 16(2):461–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer DN, Miller KD (2008) Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 51(4):808–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacquemin AP, Berry CH (1979) Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. J. Indust. Econom. 27(4):359–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordan AH, Audia PG (2012) Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):211–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2015) The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels. Strategic Management J. 36(13):1960–1978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• KC D, Staats BR, Gino F (2013) Learning from my success and from others’ failure, Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 59(11):2435–2449.Link, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P (2003) A Guide to Econometrics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kim J-Y, Finkelstein S, Haleblian J (2015) All aspirations are not created equal: The differential effects of historical and social aspirations on acquisition behavior. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1361–1388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuusela P, Keil T, Maula M (2017) Driven by aspirations, but in what direction? Performance shortfalls, slack resources, and resource-consuming vs. resource-freeing organizational change. Strategic Management J. 38(5):1101–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lant TK (1992) Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. 38(5):623–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, March J (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim E (2015) The role of reference point in CEO restricted stock and its impact on R&D intensity in high-technology firms. Strategic Management J. 36(6):872–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim E (2017) CEO option wealth and firm risk taking: An analysis of multiple reference points. Long Range Planning 50(6):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim E (2018) Social pay reference point, external environment, and risk taking: An integrated behavioral and social psychological view. J. Bus. Res. 82(2018):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim E (2019) Attainment discrepancy and new geographic market entry: The moderating roles of vertical pay disparity and horizontal pay dispersion. J. Management Stud. 56(8):1605–1629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim E, Das SS, Das A (2009) Diversification strategy, capital structure, and the Asian Financial Crisis (1997-98): Evidence from Singapore firms. Strategic Management J. 30(6):577–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim E, McCann B (2013) The influence of relative values of outside director stock options on firm strategic risk from a multi-agent view. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1568–1590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim E, McCann B (2014) Performance feedback and firm risk taking: Moderating roles of CEO and outside director stock options. Organ. Sci. 25(1):262–282.Link, Google Scholar
• Lim E, Lubatkin MH, Wiseman RM (2010) A family firm variant of the behavioral agency theory. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 4(3):197–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovallo D, Brown A, Teece DJ, Bardolet D (2020) The relationship between resource allocation flow and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 41(8):1365–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas GJ, Knoben J, Meeus MT (2018) Contradictory yet coherent? Inconsistency in performance feedback and R&D investment change. J. Management 44(2):658–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99(1):172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Chen WR (2004) Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira model. Acad. Management J. 47(1):105–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moliterno TP, Beck N, Beckman CM, Meyer M (2014) Knowing your place: Social performance feedback in good times and bad times. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1684–1702.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Palepu K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. 6(3):239–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palich LE, Cardinal LB, Miller CC (2000) Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management J. 21(2):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Fong CT (2005) Building organization theory from first principles: The self-enhancement motive and understanding power and influence. Organ. Sci. 16(4):372–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner FD (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search—A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan R, Servaes H, Zingales L (2000) The cost of diversity: The diversification discount and inefficient investment. J. Finance 55(1):35–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ref O, Shapira Z (2017) Entering new markets: The effect of performance feedback near aspiration and well below and above it. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1416–1434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders WG, Hambrick DC (2007) Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1055–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. (2010) SAS/ETS®9.22 User’s Guide (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).Google Scholar
• Scharfstein DS (1998) The dark side of internal capital markets II: Evidence from diversified conglomerates. NBER Working Paper No. 6352, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scharfstein DS, Stein JC (2000) The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent‐seeking and inefficient investment. J. Finance 55(6):2537–2564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sedikides C (1993) Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(2):317–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sedikides C, Strube M (1997) Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 29(1997):209–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin HH, Stulz RM (1998) Are internal capital markets efficient? Quart. J. Econom. 113(2):531–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Chae H (2017) The effect of organizational atypicality on reference group selection and performance evaluation. Organ. Sci. 28(6):1134–1149.Link, Google Scholar
• Teece D (1982) Toward an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(1):39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tukey J (1977) Exploratory Data Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Wheeler L (1966) Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 1(Supplement 1):27–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bowen HP (2008) Corporate diversification: The impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification. Strategic Management J. 29(2):115–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wills TA (1981) Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psych. Bull. 90(2):245–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wintoki MB, Linck JS, Netter JM (2012) Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. J. Financial Econom. 105(3):581–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiseman RM, Gomez-Mejia LR (1998) A behavioral agency model of managerial risk-taking. Acad. Management Rev. 23(1):133–153.Crossref, Google Scholar