The Impact of Firm Speed Capabilities on the Decision to Partner or Go It Alone
Published Online:20 Apr 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2020.0122
References
- (2000) The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management J. 21(3):317–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) R&D performance as a function of internal communication, project management, and the nature of the work. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management EM-27(1):2–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. 21(3):295–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Management control for market transactions: The relation between transaction characteristics, incomplete contract design, and subsequent performance. Management Sci. 51(12):1734–1752.Link, Google Scholar
- (1996) Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management J. 17(2):129–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. J. Indust. Econom. 38(4):361–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) New plant venture performance differences among incumbent, diversifying, and entrepreneurial firms: The impact of industry learning intensity. Management Sci. 57(3):549–565.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) How a firm’s capabilities affect boundary decisions. Sloan Management Rev. 40(3):137–145.Google Scholar
- (1991) The way to win in cross-border alliances. Harvard Bus. Rev. 69(6):127–135.Google Scholar
- (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Governance mode vs. governance fit: Performance implications of make-or-ally choices for product innovation in the worldwide aircraft industry, 1942–2000. Strategic Management J. 35(9):1386–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Fundamentals of Natural Gas: An International Perspective (PennWell Corporation, Tulsa, OK).Google Scholar
- (1999) When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation. Harvard Business Review on Managing High-Tech Industries (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 31–54.Google Scholar
- (2003) Foreign direct investment and host country productivity: The American automotive component industry in the 1980s. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 34(2):199–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 21(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Alliance form: A test of the contractual and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. 24(12):1209–1229.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? J. Management 17(1):121–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Integration and task allocation: Evidence from patient care. J. Econom. Management Strategy 22(3):617–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1511.Link, Google Scholar
- (1996) Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 7(2):136–150.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Institutions, capabilities, and contracts: Make or buy in the electric utility industry. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1264–1281.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Adaptation and vertical integration in the airline industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):1831–1849.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organ. Sci. 7(5):470–476.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 32(2):333–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Horizontal alliances as an alternative to autonomous production: Product expansion mode choice in the worldwide aircraft industry 1945–2000. Strategic Management J. 30(8):885–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. J. Management Stud. 41(1):61–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) The time-cost tradeoff in research and development: A review. Engrg. Costs Production Econom. 16(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering and manufacturing—A comparison between two new product teams. Management Sci. 38(3):360–373.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):781–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Contract law and the governance of inter-firm technology partnerships—An analysis of different modes of partnering and their contractual implications. J. Management Stud. 44(3):342–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Inter-firm technology transfer: Partnership-embedded licensing or standard licensing agreements? Indust. Corporate Change 18(3):529–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Collaborate with your competitors—and win. Harvard Bus. Rev. 67(1):133–139.Google Scholar
- (1998) Process innovation and learning by doing in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11-part-1):1461–1477.Google Scholar
- (2018) Time compression (dis)economies: An empirical analysis. Strategic Management J. 39(9):2489–2516.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Fast-mover advantages: Speed capabilities and entry into the emerging submarket of Atlantic Basin LNG. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1531–1550.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
- (2004) The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organ. Sci. 15(2):173–185.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Acad. Management J. 43(3):449–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1025–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management J. 28(8):827–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Is failure good? Strategic Management J. 26(7):617–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Spillover asymmetry and why it matters. Management Sci. 55(3):373–388.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) The facts about time-to-build. IMF Working Paper 00/138, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (1988) Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management J. 9(4):319–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. J. Indust. Econom. 38(2):183–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Transaction-cost economics in real time. Indust. Corporate Change 1(1):99–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. Software industry. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1187–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Do make or buy decisions matter? The influence of organizational governance on technological performance. Strategic Management J. 23(9):817–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. 9(Summer Special Issue):41–58.Google Scholar
- (1998) First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 19(12):1111–1125.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) The costs of organization. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7(1):1–25.Google Scholar
- (2016) Agglomeration and the choice between acquisitions and alliances: An information economics perspective. Strategic Management J. 37(6):1085–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents’ entry into emerging industrial subfields. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(June):208–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) Dual clocks: Entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value. Strategic Management J. 12(2):85–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Incumbents’ use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 18(3):347–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Alliances with competitors: How to combine and protect key resources? Creativity Innovation Management 11(3):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. 41(10):1624–1638.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21(1):128–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management J. 12(S1):105–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) The global logic of strategic alliances. Harvard Bus. Rev. 67(2):143–154.Google Scholar
- (2017) Network prominence, bargaining power, and the allocation of value capturing rights in high-tech alliance contracts. Organ. Sci. 28(5):947–964.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) The right speed and its value. Strategic Management J. 36(2):159–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad. Management J. 36(4):794–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Contracting practices in bulk shipping markets: A transactions cost explanation. J. Law Econom. 36(2):937–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Configuration of value chain activities: The effect of pre-entry capabilities, transaction hazards, and industry evolution on decisions to internalize. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1330–1349.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Information technology, productivity, and asset ownership: Evidence from taxicab fleets. Organ. Sci. 24(3):831–845.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) The choice between joint ventures and acquisitions: Insights from signaling theory. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1175–1190.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. 22(6‐7):687–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 29(1):47–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high-technology firms. Strategic Management J. 11(2):129–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Time—The next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev. 66(4):41–51.Google Scholar
- (1990) Competing Against Time (The Free Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(3):668–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) A managerial decision model of international cooperative venture formation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 25(1):91–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 31(2):193–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
- (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) LNG: A Nontechnical Guide (PennWell, Tulsa, OK).Google Scholar
- (2016) LNG: Fuel for a Changing World: A Nontechnical Guide , 2nd ed. (PennWell Corporation, Tulsa, OK).Google Scholar
- (2005) Distinguishing costs of cooperation and control in alliances. Strategic Management J. 26(10):913–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Opportunity costs, industry dynamics, and corporate diversification: Evidence from the cardiovascular medical device industry, 1976–2004. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1265–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Entrepreneurial risk and market entry. Management Sci. 52(9):1315–1330.Link, Google Scholar
- (1993) From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. J. Management Stud. 30(1):131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar

