Doing Well by Doing Good, Uniquely: Materiality and the Market Value of Unique CSR Strategies

References

• Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge J (2017) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Preprint, submitted October 9, https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.02926. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility. J. Management 38(4):932–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldy JE (2014) The labor market impacts of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill and offshore oil drilling moratorium. NBER Working Paper No. 20409, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Awaysheh A, Heron RA, Perry T, Wilson JI (2020) On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 41(6):965–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):794–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML, Salomon RM (2006) Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 27(11):1101–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML, Salomon RM (2012) Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):1304–1320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Sci. 32(10):1231–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (2018) Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management J. 39(13):3305–3325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1971) Economic Theory (Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. New York, NY).Google Scholar
• Belenzon S (2012) Cumulative innovation and market value: Evidence from patent citations. Econom. J. 122(559):265–285. Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Zenger TR (2016) The lemons problem in markets for strategy. Strategy Sci. 1(2):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenen J (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(3):529–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Stuart HW (1996) Value-based business strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 5(1):5–24. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brulhart F, Gherra S, Quélin BV (2019) Do stakeholder orientation and environmental proactivity impact firm profitability? J. Bus. Ethics 158(1):25–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27(4):1010–1028.Link, Google Scholar
• Cabral S, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Potoski M (2019) Value creation and value appropriation in public and non-profit organizations. Strategic Management J. 40(4):465–475.Google Scholar
• Cao J, Liang H, Zhan X (2019) Peer effects of corporate social responsibility. Management Sci. 65(12):5487–5503.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Levine DI, Toffel MW (2009) How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(1):125–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Durand R, Levine DI, Touboul S (2016) Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1597–1614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen T, Dong H, Lin C (2020) Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 135(2):483–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2014) Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management J. 35(1):1–23. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi J, Wang H (2009) Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management J. 30(8):895–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2):147–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Hawn O, Ioannou I (2019a) Willing and able: A general model of organizational responses to normative pressures. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):299–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Paugam L, Stolowy H (2019b) Do investors actually value sustainability indices? Replication, development, and new evidence on CSR visibility. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1471–1490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Lins KV, Roth L, Wagner HF (2019) Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. J. Financial Econom. 131(3):693–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles RG, Serafeim G (2013) The performance frontier: Innovating for a sustainable strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(5):50–56.Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Zenger TR (2017) Creating and capturing value in repeated exchange relationships: The second paradox of embeddedness. Organ. Sci. 28(5):894–914.Link, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2013) Corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: The environmental consciousness of shareholders. Acad. Management J. 56(3):758–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2018) Competing for government procurement contracts: The role of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management J. 39(5):1299–1324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Kacperczyk A (2019) Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers: Evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1243–1267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Luo J (2017) Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Strategic Management J. 38(2):163–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freiberg D, Rogers J, Serafeim G (2020) How ESG issues become financially material to corporations and their investors. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 20–058, Harvard University, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):777–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC, Merril CB, Hansen JM (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 30(4):425–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal J, Serafeim G, Yoon AS (2016) Shareholder activism on sustainability issues. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 17-003, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51–78. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hawn O, Ioannou I (2016) Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2569–2588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawn O, Chatterji AK, Mitchell W (2018) Do investors actually value sustainability? New evidence from investor reactions to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI). Strategic Management J. 39(4):949–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Dorobantu S, Nartey L (2014) Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1727–1748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management J. 22(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2007) What’s new in econometrics? Lecture 10: Difference-in-differences estimation. NBER Summer Institute 2007 Research Methods Lect.:1–19. July 20, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2019) Corporate sustainability: A strategy? Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 19–065, Harvard University, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
• Kaul A, Luo J (2018) An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for-profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1650–1677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan M, Serafeim G, Yoon A (2016) Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Accounting Rev. 91(6):1697–1724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh PS, Qian C, Wang H (2014) Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management J. 35(10):1464–1482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolbel J, Busch T, Jancso L (2017) How media coverage of corporate social irresponsibility increases financial risk. Strategic Management J. 38(11):2266–2284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lins KV, Servaes H, Tamayo A (2017) Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. J. Finance 72(4):1785–1824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, Rumelt RP (2003) A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management J. 24(11):1069–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litov LP, Zenger TR (2011) Do investors value uniqueness in corporate strategy? Evidence from mergers and acquisitions. Unpublished manuscript. Working Paper, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1787795.Google Scholar
• Litov LP, Moreton P, Zenger TR (2012) Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox. Management Sci. 58(10):1797–1815. Link, Google Scholar
• Luo J, Kaul A, Seo H (2018) Winning us with trifles: Adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2591–2617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Wang H, Raithel S, Zheng Q (2015) Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations and firm future returns. Strategic Management J. 36(1):123–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackey A, Mackey TB, Barney JB (2007) Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):817–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Elfenbein HA, Walsh JP (2009) Does it pay to be good…and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working Paper, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1866371.Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Qian C (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organ. Sci. 25(1):127–148. Link, Google Scholar
• Mazur NF (2017) Earthwards®: The unique Johnson & Johnson program that’s helping to create a more sustainable world. Accessed May 29, 2020, https://www.jnj.com/innovation/earthwards-a-johnson-and-johnson-program-helping-create-a-more-sustainable-world.Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):117–127. Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel DS (2011) Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. J. Management 37(5):1480–1495.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2–3):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohliver A, Crilly D, Kaul A (2019) In dubious battle: Issue salience, polarization and corporate social counterpositioning. Working paper, London Business School, London, UK.Google Scholar
• Nardi L (2021) The corporate social responsibility price premium as an enabler of substantive CSR. Acad. Management Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1979) How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 57(2):137–145.Google Scholar
• Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Sci. 59(5):1045–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Surroca J, Tribó J, Waddock S (2010) Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management J. 31(5):463–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Hull CE, Rothenberg S (2012) How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR-financial performance relationship. J. Management Stud. 49(7):1274–1303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uhlmann DM (2020) BP paid a steep price for the Gulf oil spill but for the US a decade later, it’s business as usual. The Conversation. Accessed June 2, 2020, https://theconversation.com/bp-paid-a-steep-price-for-the-gulf-oil-spill-but-for-the-us-a-decade-later-its-business-as-usual-136905.Google Scholar
• Waddock S, Graves S (1997) The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management J. 18(4):303–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Choi J, Li J (2008) Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):143–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Williams JP (2020) In Louisiana, improvements and challenges abound in decade since BP oil spill. US News Online (April 17), accessed July 1, 2020, https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2020-04-17/10-years-after-deepwater-horizon-oil-spill-improvements-and-challenges-abound.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data Second (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhou X (2020) Dare to be different? Conformity vs. differentiation in corporate social activities of Chinese firms and market responses. Acad. Management J. 63(3):717–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Murrell A (2016) Revisiting the corporate social performance—Financial performance link: A replication of Waddock and Graves. Strategic Management J. 37(11):2378–2388.Crossref, Google Scholar