Decoding Culture: Tools for Behavioral Strategists

References

• Adner R, Puranam P, Zhu F (2019) What is different about digital strategy? From quantitative to qualitative change. Strategy Sci. 4(4):253–261.Link, Google Scholar
• Åkerlund M (2022) Dog whistling far-right code words: The case of ‘culture enricher’ on the Swedish web. Inform. Comm. Soc. 25(12):1808–1825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander JC, Smith P (1993) The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural studies. Theory Soc. 22(2):151–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvarez SA, Porac J (2020) Imagination, indeterminacy, and managerial choice at the limit of knowledge. Acad. Management Rev. 45(4):735–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amengual M, Apfelbaum EP (2021) True motives: Prosocial and instrumental justifications for behavioral change in organizations. Management Sci. 67(8):5032–5051.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L (2012) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1974) The Limits of Organization (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1983) Semiotics and the study of occupational and organizational cultures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(3):393–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard CI (1938) The Functions of the Executive, vol. 11 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Casciaro T (2012) Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Acad. Management J. 55:381–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhatt AM, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2021) A language-based method for assessing symbolic boundary maintenance between social groups. Sociol. Methods Res. 51(4):1681–1720.Google Scholar
• Bougon M, Weick K, Binkhorst D (1977) Cognition in organizations: An analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):606–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Bourgoin A, Marchessaux F, Bencherki N (2018) We need to talk about strategy: How to conduct effective strategic dialogue. Bus. Horizons 61(4):587–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boutyline A, Soter LK (2021) Cultural schemas: What they are, how to find them, and what to do once you’ve caught one. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(4):728–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boutyline A, Vaisey S (2017) Belief network analysis: A relational approach to understanding the structure of attitudes. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(5):1371–1447.Google Scholar
• Bragaw NA, Misangyi VF (2022) Disentangling strategic consensus: Strategic consensus types, psychological bonds, and their effects on strategic climate. Acad. Management Rev. 47(4):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley KM (1997) Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. J. Organ. Behav.: Internat. J. Indust. Occupational Organ. Psych. Behav. 18(S1):533–558.Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Sørensen JB (2021) Making Great Strategy: Arguing for Organizational Advantage (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the US brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catton Jr, WR (1959) A theory of value. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 24(3):310–317.Google Scholar
• Centola D, Macy M (2007) Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(3):702–734.Google Scholar
• Cerulo KA, Leschziner V, Shepherd H (2021) Rethinking culture and cognition. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 47:63–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler D (2001) The Basics (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Chang D, Chen R, Krupka E (2019) Rhetoric matters: A social norms explanation for the anomaly of framing. Games Econom. Behav. 116:158–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, O’Reilly CA (2016) Paradigm lost: Reinvigorating the study of organizational culture. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:199–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Srivastava SB (2021) A psychologist and sociologist join strategists for breakfast: Building a framework to understand culture and its relationship to strategy. Strategy Sci. 6(2):119–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Caldwell DF, O’Reilly CA, Doerr B (2014) Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high‐technology firms. J. Organ. Behav. 35(6):785–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chudek M, Henrich J (2011) Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends Cognitive Sci. 15(5):218–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark HH (1996) Using Language (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark HH (1998) Communal lexicons. Malmjaer K, Williams J, eds. Context in Language Learning and Language Understanding (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 63–87.Google Scholar
• Cooper‐Thomas HD, Anderson N (2006) Organizational socialization: A new theoretical model and recommendations for future research and HRM practices in organizations. J. Management Psych. 21(5):492–516.Google Scholar
• Corritore M, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2020) Duality in diversity: How intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortés JD (2022) What is the mission of innovation?—Lexical structure, sentiment analysis, and cosine similarity of mission statements of research-knowledge intensive institutions. PLoS One 17(8):e0267454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremer J, Garicano L, Prat A (2007) Language and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 122(1):373–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategic representations. Strategy Sci. 3(4):606–619.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Ostler J (2020) A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1198–1219.Link, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Di Stefano G (2018) A universe of stories: Mobilizing narrative practices during transformative change. Strategic Management J. 39(3):664–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Rindova V, Ravasi D (2010) Where strategy meets culture: The neglected role of cultural and symbolic resources in strategy research. Adv. Strategic Management 27:175–208.Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Rindova V, Ravasi D (2016) Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at Alessi. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):347–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das TK (2017) Cultural Values in Strategy and Organization (Research in Strategy Science) (Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC).Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P (1997) Culture and cognition. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23(1):263–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Douglas M (1986) How Institutions Think (Syracuse University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Durand R, Rao H, Monin P (2007) Code and conduct in French cuisine: Impact of code changes on external evaluations. Strategic Management J. 28(5):455–472.Google Scholar
• Eisenberg EM (1984) Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Comm. Monographs 51(3):227–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Fagin R, Halpern JY, Moses Y, Vardi M (1995) Reasoning About Knowledge (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psych. Sci. 24(1):56–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg M, Willer R (2015) From gulf to bridge: When do moral arguments facilitate political influence? Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 41(12):1665–1681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg M, Willer R (2019) Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 13(12):e12501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford JD, Hegarty WH (1984) Decision makers’ beliefs about the causes and effects of structure: An exploratory study. Acad. Management J. 27(2):271–291.Google Scholar
• Friedman S, Schmer-Galunder S, Chen A, Rye J (2019) Relating word embedding gender biases to gender gaps: A cross-cultural analysis. Proc. 1st Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 18–24.Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Greve HR (2019) Safe or profitable? The pursuit of conflicting goals. Organ. Sci. 30(4):647–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Garicano L, Wu Y (2012) Knowledge, communication, and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1382–1397.Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Rivkin JW (2007) On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organ. Sci. 18(3):420–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Annals 6(1):1–40.Google Scholar
• Geertz C (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures, vol. 5019 (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Gelfand MJ, Harrington JR (2015) The motivational force of descriptive norms: For whom and when are descriptive norms most predictive of behavior? J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 46(10):1273–1278.Google Scholar
• Gelfand MJ, Raver JL, Nishii L, Leslie LM, Lun J, Lim BC, Duan L (2011) Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science 332(6033):1100–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, LiCalzi M, Warglien M (2021a) What situation is this? Shared frames and collective performance. Strategy Sci. 6(2):124–140.Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Siegel J, Weber RA (2021b) Strategy meets culture (for breakfast): Understanding the relationship and highlighting its potential. Strategy Sci. 6(2):111–118.Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management J. 12(6):433–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Nag R, Corley KG (2012) Visionary ambiguity and strategic change: The virtue of vagueness in launching major organizational change. J. Management Inquiry 21(4):364–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giorgi S, Bartunek JM, King BG (2017) A Saul Alinsky primer for the 21st century: The roles of cultural competence and cultural brokerage in fostering mobilization in support of change. Res. Organ. Behav. 37:125–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giorgi S, Lockwood C, Glynn MA (2015) The many faces of culture: Making sense of 30 years of research on culture in organization studies. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):1–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Goldberg A (2011) Mapping shared understandings using relational class analysis: The case of the cultural omnivore reexamined. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(5):1397–1436.Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Stein SK (2018) Beyond social contagion: Associative diffusion and the emergence of cultural variation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(5):897–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Srivastava SB, Manian VG, Monroe W, Potts C (2016) Fitting in or standing out? The tradeoffs of structural and cultural embeddedness. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1190–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J, Haidt J, Koleva S, Motyl M, Iyer R, Wojcik SP, Ditto PH (2013) Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA), 55–130.Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(6):1420–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2006) Does culture affect economic outcomes? J. Econom. Perspective 20(2):23–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackel LM, Coppin G, Wohl MJ, Van Bavel JJ (2018) From groups to grits: Social identity shapes evaluations of food pleasantness. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 74:270–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Crossland C (2018) A strategy for behavioral strategy: Appraisal of small, midsize, and large tent conceptions of this embryonic community. Behavioral Strategy in Perspective. Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 39 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 23–39.Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Le Mens G, Hsu G, Kovács B, Negro G, Pólos L, Pontikes E, et al. (2019) Concepts and Categories: Foundations for Sociological and Cultural Analysis (Columbia University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JR, Carroll GR (1991) Keeping the faith: A model of cultural transmission in formal organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(4):552–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JR, Carroll GR (2006) Culture and Demography in Organizations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Corley KG (2011) Clean climbing, carabiners, and cultural cultivation: Developing an open-systems perspective of culture. Organ. Sci. 22(2):391–412.Link, Google Scholar
• He VF, Puranam P, Shrestha YR, von Krogh G (2020) Resolving governance disputes in communities: A study of software license decisions. Strategic Management J. 41(10):1837–1868.Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP, Maule AJ (2002) The individual in the strategy process: Insights from behavioural decision research and cognitive mapping. Mapping Strategic Knowledge (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 196–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong YY, Morris MW, Chiu CY, Benet-Martinez V (2000) Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. Amer. Psych. 55(7):709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville J, Nelson AJ, Earle AG, Haack JA, Young DM (2017) “If chemists don’t do it, who is going to?” Peer-driven occupational change and the emergence of green chemistry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):524–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT (2005) Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 16(5):474–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT, Koçak Ö (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Kovács B, Koçak Ö (2019) Experientially diverse customers and organizational adaptation in changing demand landscapes: A study of US cannabis markets, 2014–2016. Strategic Management J. 40(13):2214–2241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunzaker MF, Valentino L (2019) Mapping cultural schemas: From theory to method. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 84(5):950–981.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Sillince JA, Shaw D (2010) Strategic ambiguity as a rhetorical resource for enabling multiple interests. Human. Relations 63(2):219–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson C, Dowd TJ, Ridgeway CL (2006) Legitimacy as a social process. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32(annual):53–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahan DM, Braman D (2006) Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law Policy Rev. 24:149.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgement and choice. Amer. Psych. 58(9):697–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2011) Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organ. Sci. 22(2):320–346.Link, Google Scholar
• Katz D, Allport FH, Jenness MB (1931) Students’ Attitudes: A Report of the Syracuse University Reaction Study (Craftsmen Press, Syracuse, NY).Google Scholar
• Keller J, Loewenstein J (2011) The cultural category of cooperation: A cultural consensus model analysis for China and the United States. Organ. Sci. 22(2):299–319.Link, Google Scholar
• Kellermanns FW, Walter J, Floyd SW, Lechner C, Shaw JC (2011) To agree or not to agree? A meta-analytical review of strategic consensus and organizational performance. J. Bus. Res. 64(2):126–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koçak Ö, Puranam P (2018) Designing a culture of collaboration: When changing beliefs is (not) enough. Organization Design. Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 40 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 27–52.Google Scholar
• Koçak Ö, Puranam P (2022) Separated by a common language: How the nature of code differences shapes communication success and code convergence. Management Sci. 68(7):5287–5310.Google Scholar
• Koçak Ö, Levinthal DA, Puranam P (2023) The dual challenge of search and coordination for organizational adaptation: How structures of influence matter. Organ. Sci. 34(2):851–869.Google Scholar
• Koçak Ö, Park S, Puranam P (2022) Ambiguity can compensate for semantic differences in human-AI communication. Comput. Human Behav. Rep. 6:100200.Google Scholar
• Koçak Ö, Puranam P, Yegin A (2023) Decoding cultural conflicts. Working paper, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
• Koen P, Ajamian G, Burkart R, Clamen A, Davidson J, D’Amore R, Elkins C (2001) Providing clarity and a common language to the “fuzzy front end”. Res. Techn. Management 44(2):46–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Google Scholar
• Kotter JP, Heskett JL (1992) Corporate Culture and Performance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Krauss RM, Fussell SR (1991) Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others’ knowledge in reference. Soc. Cognition 9(1):2–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunda G (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Kuran T (1997) Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Leitch S, Davenport S (2007) Strategic ambiguity as a discourse practice: The role of keywords in the discourse on ‘sustainable’ biotechnology. Discourse Stud. 9(1):43–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organ. Sci. 22(2):347–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Leschziner V, Brett G (2021) Have schemas been good to think with? Sociol. Forum 36:1207–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2011) A behavioral approach to strategy—What’s the alternative? Strategic Management J. 32(13):1517–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis D (1969) Convention: A Philosophical Study (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Li H, Van den Steen E (2021) Birds of a feather… Enforce social norms? Interactions among culture, norms, and strategy. Strategy Sci. 6(2):166–189.Link, Google Scholar
• Lizardo O (2017) Improving cultural analysis: Considering personal culture in its declarative and nondeclarative modes. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(1):88–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockwood C, Glynn MA, Giorgi S (2023) Polishing the gilt edge: Elite category endurance and symbolic boundaries in US luxury hotels, 1790–2015. Acad. Management J. 66(1):9–42.Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6‐7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu R, Chatman JA, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2023) Two-sided cultural fit: The differing behavioral consequences of cultural congruence based on values vs. perceptions. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print April 5, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1659.Link, Google Scholar
• MacDuffie JP (1997) The road to “root cause”: Shop-floor problem-solving at three auto assembly plants. Management Sci. 43(4):479–502.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Schulz M, Zhou X (2000) The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marchetti A (2020) Organizational culture and performance. PhD dissertation, INSEAD, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Marchetti A, Puranam P (2022) Organizational cultural strength as the negative cross-entropy of mindshare: A measure based on descriptive text. Humanities Social Sci. Comm. 9(1):1–14.Google Scholar
• Martin JL, Lembo A (2020) On the other side of values. Amer. J. Sociol. 126(1):52–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin JL, Lembo A (2022) Response to Vaisey 1. Sociol. Forum 37(1):294–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martins LL, Rindova VP, Greenbaum BE (2015) Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 9(1):99–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathys C, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ, Stephan KE (2011) A Bayesian foundation for individual learning under uncertainty. Frontiers Human Neurosci. 5:39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medin DL, Lynch EB, Coley JD, Atran S (1997) Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome? Cognitive Psych. 32(1):49–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molinsky A (2007) Cross-cultural code-switching: The psychological challenges of adapting behavior in foreign cultural interactions. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):622–640.Google Scholar
• Morris MW, Liu Z (2015) Psychological functions of subjective norms: Reference groups, moralization, adherence, and defiance. J. Cross Cultural Psych. 46(10):1279–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris MW, Hong YY, Chiu CY, Liu Z (2015) Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 129:1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan VK, Zane LJ, Kemmerer B (2011) The cognitive perspective in strategy: An integrative review. J. Management 37(1):305–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nilep C (2006) “Code switching” in sociocultural linguistics. Colorado Res. Linguistics 19. https://doi.org/10.25810/hnq4-jv62.Google Scholar
• Nisbett RE, Norenzayan A (2002) Culture and cognition. Memory and cognitive processes. Pashler H, Medin D, eds. Steven’s Handbook of Experimental Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 561–597.Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Joseph J (2005) Cultural adaptation and institutional change: The evolution of vocabularies of corporate governance, 1972–2003. Poetics 33(3–4):163–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olivos F (2020) Untangling causal beliefs: A lay theory of happiness determinants using a factorial survey. Poetics 81:101442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Ansell CK (1993) Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(6):1259–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paluck EL (2009) What’s in a norm? Sources and processes of norm change. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(3):594–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paluck EL, Shepherd H (2012) The salience of social referents: A field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 103(6):899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons T (1935) The place of ultimate values in sociological theory. Internat. J. Ethics 45(3):282–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons T (1937) The Structure of Social Action (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Pettigrew AM (1979) On studying organizational cultures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):570–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pólos L, Hannan MT, Carroll GR (2002) Foundations of a theory of social forms. Industrial Corporate Change 11(1):85–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2018) Category strategy for firm advantage. Strategy Sci. 3(4):620–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Kim R (2017) Strategic categorization. From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads, vol. 51 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 71–111.Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26(4):397–416.Google Scholar
• Powell TC, Lovallo D, Fox CR (2011) Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1369–1386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice D, Paluck EL (2020) Engineering social change using social norms: Lessons from the study of collective action. Current Opinion Psych. 35:138–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Swamy M (2016) How initial representations shape coupled learning processes. Organ. Sci. 27(2):323–335.Google Scholar
• Rawlings CM, Childress C (2021) Schemas, interactions, and objects in meaning‐making 1. Sociol. Forum 36:1446–1477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Dalpiaz E, Ravasi D (2011) A cultural quest: A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation. Organ. Sci. 22(2):413–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2018) From values to value: Value rationality and the creation of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1):323–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2012) Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(6):999–1022.Google Scholar
• Rokeach M (1973) The Nature of Human Values (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Romney AK, Batchelder WH, Weller SC (1987) Recent applications of cultural consensus theory. Amer. Behav. Sci. 31(2):163–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63(4):64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rozin P (1999) The process of moralization. Psych. Sci. 10(3):218–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saks AM, Gruman JA (2012) Getting newcomers on board: A review of socialization practices and introduction to socialization resources theory. Wanberg CR, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Socialization (Oxford University Press, New York), 27–55.Google Scholar
• Schein EH (1985) Organizational Culture and Leadership (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Schein EH (1996) Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):229–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, New York), 1–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scotton CM, Ury W (1977) Bilingual strategies: The social functions of code-switching. Internat. J. Soc. Language 13:5–20.Google Scholar
• Shteynberg G, Gelfand MJ, Kim K (2009) Peering into the “magnum mysterium” of culture: The explanatory power of descriptive norms. J. Cross Cultural Psych. 40(1):46–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha PN, Jaskiewicz P, Gibb J, Combs JG (2020) Managing history: How New Zealand’s Gallagher Group used rhetorical narratives to reprioritize and modify imprinted strategic guideposts. Strategic Management J. 41(3):557–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB (2002) The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):70–91.Google Scholar
• Soublière JF, Lockwood C (2022) Achieving cultural resonance: Four strategies toward rallying support for entrepreneurial endeavors. Strategic Management J. 43(8):1499–1527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spike M, Stadler K, Kirby S, Smith K (2017) Minimal requirements for the emergence of learned signaling. Cognitive Sci. 41(3):623–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2014) The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1253–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE, West RF (2000) Advancing the rationality debate. Behav. Brain Sci. 23(05):701–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3):387–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss C, Quinn N (1997) A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Sugden R (1989) Spontaneous order. J. Econom. Perspective 3(4):85–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swidler A (2001) Talk of Love: How Culture Matters (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarakci M, Ates NY, Porck JP, van Knippenberg D, Groenen PJ, de Haas M (2014) Strategic consensus mapping: A new method for testing and visualizing strategic consensus within and between teams. Strategic Management J. 35(7):1053–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teubner G (2000) Contracting worlds: The many autonomies of private law. Soc. Legal Stud. 9(3):399–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Google Scholar
• Vaisey S (2009) Motivation and justification: A dual-process model of culture in action. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(6):1675–1715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaisey S, Valentino L (2018) Culture and choice: Toward integrating cultural sociology with the judgment and decision-making sciences. Poetics 68:131–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Steen E (2010) Culture clash: The costs and benefits of homogeneity. Management Sci. 56(10):1718–1738.Link, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Wason PC, Evans JSB (1974) Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition 3(2):141–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K (2005) A toolkit for analyzing corporate cultural toolkits. Poetics 33(3–4):227–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations, vol. 3 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zou X, Tam KP, Morris MW, Lee SL, Lau IYM, Chiu CY (2009) Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus vs. personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97(4):579.Crossref, Google Scholar