Startup Acquisitions as a Hiring Strategy: Turnover Differences Between Acquired and Regular Hires

References

• Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22(3):197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen DG, Bryant PC, Vardaman JM (2010) Retaining talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Acad. Management Perspect. 24(2):48–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Jones BF, Kim JD, Miranda J (2020) Age and high-growth entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev.: Insights 2(1):65–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M (2011) Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring vs. internal mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56:369–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleeke JA, Daniels LJ (1985) After a deal is completed: How far and how fast to move? California Management Rev. 30:9–11.Google Scholar
• Bodner J, Capron L (2018) Post-merger integration. J. Organization Design 7:3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botelho TL, Fehder D, Hochberg Y (2021) Innovation-driven entrepreneurship. NBER working paper no. w28990, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Buono AF, Bowditch JL, Lewis JW (1985) When cultures collide: The anatomy of a merger. Human Relations 38(5):477–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Coff R, Kryscynski D (2012a) Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):376–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco AM, Agarwal R (2012b) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):65–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P (1999) The New Deal at Work: Managing the Market-Driven Workforce (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Capron L, Dussauge P, Mitchell W (1998) Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988–1992. Strategic Management J. 19(7):631–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castanias RP, Helfat CE (1991) Managerial resources and rents. J. Management 17(1):155–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan W (1996) External recruitment vs. internal promotion. J. Labor Econom. 14(4):555–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Patro A (2014) Dynamic capabilities and managing human capital. Acad. Management Perspect. 28(4):395–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung SHD, Parker SC (2023) Founder affiliations: Jobseeker reactions and impact on employee recruitment by start-up ventures. Small Bus. Econom. 61:259–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clough DR, Fang TP, Vissa B, Wu A (2019) Turning lead into gold: How do entrepreneurs mobilize resources to exploit opportunities? Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):240–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1997) Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2):374–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1999) How buyers cope with uncertainty when acquiring firms in knowledge-intensive industries: Caveat emptor. Organ. Sci. 10(2):144–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Coff RW (2002) Human capital, shared expertise, and the likelihood of impasse in corporate acquisitions. J. Management 28(1):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decker R, Haltiwanger J, Jarmin R, Miranda J (2014) The role of entrepreneurship in US job creation and economic dynamism. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(3):3–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doeringer PB, Piore MJ (1971) Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY).Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (2008) Person–environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):167–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman ER, Hernandez E (2022) Synergy in mergers and acquisitions: Typology, lifecycles, and value. Acad. Management Rev. 47(4):549–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S (2003) The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 32(2):333–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldschlag N, Miranda J (2020) Business dynamics statistics of high tech industries. J. Econom. Management Strategy 29(1):3–30.Google Scholar
• Gonzalez M (2023) Email interview regarding his perspective on startup acquisitions at Google, May 18.Google Scholar
• Graebner ME (2004) Momentum and serendipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):751–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graebner ME, Eisenhardt KM (2004) The seller’s side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):366–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham SJH, Grim C, Islam T, Marco AC, Miranda J (2018) Business dynamics of innovating firms: Linking U.S. patents with administrative data on workers and firms. J. Econom. Management Strategy 27(3):372–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granstrand O, Sjölander S (1990) The acquisition of technology and small firms by large firms. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 13(3):367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee LE, Nanda A (2008) Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Sci. 54(7):1213–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Stern S (2020) The state of American entrepreneurship: New estimates of the quantity and quality of entrepreneurship for 32 US states, 1988–2014. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 12(4):212–243.Google Scholar
• Haltiwanger J, Hyatt H, McEntarfer E, Sousa L, Tibbets S (2014) Firm age and size in the longitudinal employer-household dynamics data. Working paper no. 14–16, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (1993) Relative standing: A framework for understanding departures of acquired executives. Acad. Management J. 36:733–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris D, Helfat C (1997) Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management J. 18:895–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haspeslagh PC, Jemison DB (1991) Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hatch NW, Dyer JH (2004) Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 25:1155–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hecker DE (2005) High-technology employment: A NAICS-based update. Bureau Labor Statist.: Monthly Labor Rev. 128:57–72.Google Scholar
• Hegde D (2014) Tacit knowledge and the structure of license contracts: Evidence from the biomedical industry. J. Econom. Manage. Strategy 23(3):568–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins MJ, Rodriguez D (2006) The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry. J. Financial Econom. 80(2):351–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurst E, Pugsley BW (2011) What do small businesses do? Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 43:73–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B (1979) Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. 87(5):972–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Balachandran C (2018) Vertical and horizontal wage dispersion and mobility outcomes: Evidence from the Swedish microdata. Organ. Sci. 29(1):17–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Younkin P (2017) The paradox of breadth: The tension between experience and legitimacy in the transition to entrepreneurship. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):731–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Lim K (2007) The impact of acquisitions on the productivity of inventors at semiconductor firms: A synthesis of knowledge-based and incentive-based perspectives. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1133–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Kaul A (2015) Structural recombination and innovation: Unlocking intraorganizational knowledge synergy through structural change. Organ. Sci. 26(2):439–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Mitchell W (2000) Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1061–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Williams C (2012) Structural knowledge: How executive experience with structural composition affects intrafirm mobility and unit reconfiguration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):681–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keith K, McWilliams A (1995) The wage effects of cumulative job mobility. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 49(1):121–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr SP, Kerr WR (2017) Immigrant entrepreneurship. Haltiwanger J, Hurst E, Miranda J, Schoar A, eds. Measuring Entrepreneurial Businesses: Current Knowledge and Challenges (National Burea of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA), 187–249.Google Scholar
• Kim JD (2018) Is there a startup wage premium? Evidence from MIT graduates. Res. Policy 47(3):637–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JD (2022) Startup acquisitions, relocation, and employee entrepreneurship. Strategic Management J. 43(11):2189–2216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JD, Kim M (2023) Founder turnover and organizational change. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print April 13, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1668.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein B, Crawford RG, Alchian AA (1978) Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. 21(2):297–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larsson R, Finkelstein S (1999) Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organ. Sci. 10(1):1–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim JD (2022) When do startups scale? Large-scale evidence from job postings. Preprint, submitted January 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4015530.Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Mitchell TR (1994) An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Acad. Management Rev. 19(1):51–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lepak DP, Snell SA (1999) The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):31–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, Rumelt RP (2003) A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management J. 24:1069–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mawdsley JK, Somaya D (2016) Employee mobility and organizational outcomes: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Management 42(1):85–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEnrue MP (1988) Length of experience and the performance of managers in the establishment phase of their careers. Acad. Management J. 31(1):175–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TR, Holtom BC, Lee TW, Sablynski CJ, Erez M (2001) Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1102–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng W, Stuart TE (2022) Acquired employees vs. hired employees: Retained or turned over? Strategic Management J. 43(5):1025–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Chatman J, Caldwell DF (1991) People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad. Management J. 34(3):487–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouimet P, Zarutskie R (2020) Acquiring labor. Quart. J. Finance 10(3):2050011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Nerkar A, Hambrick DC (2006) Acquisition integration and productivity losses in the technical core: Disruption of inventors in acquired companies. Organ. Sci. 17(5):545–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ (2005) Organizational genealogies and the persistence of gender inequality: The case of Silicon Valley law firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):440–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Srikanth K (2007) What they know vs. what they do: How acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 28(8):805–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Singh H, Zollo M (2003) A bird in the hand or two in the bush?: Integration trade-offs in technology-grafting acquisitions. Eur. Management J. 21(2):179–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Singh H, Zollo M (2006) Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 49(2):263–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rachleff A (2014) WhatsApp: What an acquisition means for employees. Accessed July 1, 2019, https://blog.wealthfront.com/whatsapp-acquisition-employees/.Google Scholar
• Ranft AL, Lord MD (2000) Acquiring new knowledge: The role of retaining human capital in acquisitions of high-tech firms. J. High Tech. Management Res. 11(2):295–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranft AL, Lord MD (2002) Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organ. Sci. 13(4):420–441.Link, Google Scholar
• Rider CI, Tan D (2019) Retention is not a strategic imperative: On the pros and cons of employee turnover. Nyberg AJ, Moliterno TP, eds. Handbook of Research on Strategic Human Capital Resources (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 458–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H (2023) Can technology startups hire talented early employees? Ability, preferences, and employee first job choice. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print August 8, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4868.Google Scholar
• Rubenstein AL, Kammeyer-Mueller JD, Wang M, Thundiyil TG (2019) “Embedded” at hire? Predicting the voluntary and involuntary turnover of new employees. J. Organ. Behav. 40(3):342–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider B (1987) The people make the place. Personnel Psych. 40(3):437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selby J, Mayer KJ (2013) Startup firm acquisitions as a human resource strategy for innovation: The acqhire phenomenon. Acad. Management Proc. 2013(1):17109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2006) A paradox of synergy: Contagion and capacity effects in mergers and acquisitions. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):962–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Stuart HC (2017) Structural disruption, relational experimentation, and performance in professional hockey teams: A network perspective on member change. Organ. Sci. 28(2):283–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Sorenson O (2003) Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):175–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Sorenson O (2005) Social networks and entrepreneurship. Alvarez SA, Agarwal R, Sorenson O, eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research (Springer, Boston), 233–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan D, Rider CI (2017) Let them go? How losing employees to competitors can enhance firm status. Strategic Management J. 38(9):1848–1874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Steen E (2010) Culture clash: The costs and benefits of homogeneity. Management Sci. 56(10):1718–1738.Link, Google Scholar
• Vilhuber L (2018) LEHD infrastructure S2014 files in the FSRDC. Working paper no. CES-18-27, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1988) Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 9(2):173–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman N (2017) The throne vs. the kingdom: Founder control and value creation in startups. Strategic Management J. 38(2):255–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler AR, Coleman Gallagher V, Brouer RL, Sablynski CJ (2007) When person‐organization (mis)fit and (dis)satisfaction lead to turnover: The moderating role of perceived job mobility. J. Managerial Psych. 22(2):203–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wollmann TG (2019) Stealth consolidation: Evidence from an amendment to the Hart-Scott-Rodino act. Amer. Econom. Rev.: Insights 1(1):77–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger TR (1992) Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining The relationships among performance, pay, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(2):198–219.Crossref, Google Scholar