Ownership as a Bundle of Rights: Antecedents of the Wedge Between Control and Cash-Flow Rights Within Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2022.0114

References

  • Aggarwal VA, Wu B (2015) Organizational constraints to adaptation: Intrafirm asymmetry in the locus of coordination. Organ. Sci. 26(1):218–238.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105(1):1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albert D (2024) What do you mean by organizational structure? Acknowledging and harmonizing differences and commonalities in three prominent perspectives. J. Organ. Design 13:1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida H, Park SY, Subrahmanyam MG, Wolfenzon D (2011) The structure and formation of business groups: Evidence from Korean chaebols. J. Financial Econom. 99(2):447–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Areeda P, Turner D (1979) Conglomerate mergers: Extended interdependence and effects on interindustry competition as grounds on condemnation. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 127:1082–1103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N (1996) Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management J. 17(2):129–150.Google Scholar
  • Barkema HG, Schijven M (2008) Toward unlocking the full potential of acquisitions: The role of organizational restructuring. Acad. Management J. 51(4):696–722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney JB (1988) Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):71–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JA, Korn HJ (1999) Dynamics of dyadic competitive interaction. Strategic Management J. 20(3):251–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belenzon S, Berkovitz T, Rios LA (2013) Capital markets and firm organization: How financial development shapes European corporate groups. Management Sci. 59(6):1326–1343.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berle AA, Means GC (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Harcourt, Brace & World, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Bernheim BD, Whinston MD (1990) Multimarket contact and collusive behavior. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Mehta P, Mullainathan S (2002) Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):121–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bethel J, Liebeskind J (1998) Diversification and the legal organization of the firm. Organ. Sci. 9(1):49–67.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brush TH (1996) Predicted change in operational synergy and post‐acquisition performance of acquired businesses. Strategic Management J. 17(1):1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bulow JI, Geanakoplos JD, Klemperer PD (1985) Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. 93(3):488–511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buchuk D, Larrain B, Munoz F, Urzua F (2014) The internal capital markets of business groups: Evidence from intra-group loans. J. Financial Econom. 112(2):190–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenbark JR, Semadeni M, Arrfelt M, Withers MC (2022) Corporate-level influences on internal capital allocation: The role of financial analyst performance projections. Strategic Management J. 43(1):180–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cabral L, Pacheco-de-Almeida G (2019) Alliance formation and firm value. Management Sci. 65(2):879–895.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cao J, Pan X, Tian G (2011) Disproportional ownership structure and pay–performance relationship: Evidence from China’s listed firms. J. Corporate Finance 17(3):541–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang SJ (2003) Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Acad. Management J. 46(2):238–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang SJ, Hong J (2000) Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Acad. Management J. 43(3):429–448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen M, Kaul A, Wu B (2019) Adaptation across multiple landscapes: Relatedness, complexity, and the long run effects of coordination in diversified firms. Strategic Management J. 40(11):1791–1821.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Claessens S, Djankov S, Lang LHP (2000) The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. J. Financial Econom. 58(1–2):81–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clement J, Puranam P (2018) Searching for structure: Formal organization design as a guide to network evolution. Management Sci. 64(8):3879–3895.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clougherty JA, Duso T, Muck J (2016) Correcting for self-selection based endogeneity in management research: Review, recommendations and simulations. Organ. Res. Methods 19(2):286–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collis D, Montgomery CA (2005) Corporate Strategy: A Resource-Based Approach, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Connelly BL, Hoskisson R, Tihanyi L, Certo ST (2010) Ownership as a form of corporate governance. J. Management Stud. 47(8):1561–1589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Connelly BL, Lee KB, Tihanyi L, Certo ST, Johnson JL (2019) Something in common: Competitive dissimilarity and performance of rivals with common shareholders. Acad. Management J. 62(1):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz H (2008) From Economic Man to Economic System (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunning JH, Lundan SM (2008) Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, 2nd ed. (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA).Google Scholar
  • Dyer JH, Singh H, Hesterly WS (2018) The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3140–3162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ederer F, Pellegrino B (2024) A tale of two networks: Common ownership and product market rivalry. Rev. Econom. Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Ethiraj S, Zhou YM (2019) Fight or flight? Market positions, submarket interdependencies, and strategic responses to entry threats. Strategic Management J. 40(10):1545–1569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans WN, Kessides IN (1994) Living by the “golden rule”: Multimarket contact in the US airline industry. Quart. J. Econom. 109(2):341–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fayol H (1949) General and Industrial Management (Pitman, London).Google Scholar
  • Feinberg RM (1984) Mutual forbearance as an extension of oligopoly theory. J. Econom. Bus. 36(2):243–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernández N, Marín PL (1998) Market power and multimarket contact: Some evidence from the Spanish hotel industry. J. Indust. Econom. 46(1):301–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fitza M, Tihanyi L (2017) How much does ownership form matter? Strategic Management J. 38(13):2726–2743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford RC, Randolph WA (1992) Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. J. Management 18(2):267–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franko LG (1978) Organizational structures and multinational strategies of continental European enterprises. Ghertman M, Leontiades J, eds. European Research in International Business (North Holland, Amsterdam), 111–140.Google Scholar
  • Fuentelsaz L, Gómez J (2006) Multipoint competition, strategic similarity and entry into geographic markets. Strategic Management J. 27(5):477–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith JR (1977) Organization Design (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Gerlach ML (1992) The Japanese corporate network: A blockmodel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1):105–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilo D, Moshe Y, Spiegel Y (2006) Partial cross ownership and tacit collusion. RAND J. Econom. 37(1):81–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gimeno J, Woo CY (1999) Multimarket contact, economies of scope, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 42(3):239–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golden BR, Ma H (2003) Mutual forbearance: The role of intrafirm integration and rewards. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):479–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2008) Multimarket contact and sales growth: Evidence from insurance. Strategic Management J. 29(3):229–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guillén M, Capron L (2016) State capacity, minority shareholder protections, and stock market development. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):125–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haans RF, Pieters C, He ZL (2016) Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1177–1195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansmann H (2000) The Ownership of Enterprise (The Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman HA, Nonnemaker L (2000) Competition in multiple geographic markets: The impact on growth and market entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(2):232–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1994) The firm as an incentive system. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):972–991.Google Scholar
  • Hong HA, Kim JB, Welker M (2017) Divergence of cash flow and voting rights, opacity, and stock price crash risk: International evidence. J. Accounting Res. 55(5):1167–1212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes K, Oughton C (1993) Diversification, multi-market contact and profitability. Economica 60(238):203–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jans I, Rosenbaum DI (1997) Multimarket contact and pricing: Evidence from the U.S. cement industry. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 15(3):391–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jayachandran S, Gimeno J, Varadarajan PR (1999) The theory of multimarket competition: A synthesis and implications for marketing strategy. J. Marketing 63(3):49–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jia N, Shi J, Wang C, Wang Y (2020) Parasites and paragons: Ownership reform and concentrated interest among minority shareholders. J. Management Stud. 57(1):129–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • John CH, Harrison JS (1999) Manufacturing‐based relatedness, synergy, and coordination. Strategic Management J. 20(2):129–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2000) Tunneling. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):22–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joseph J, Sengul M (2024) Organization design: Current insights and future research directions. J. Management Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Joseph J, Wilson A (2018) The growth of the firm: An attention-based view. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1779–1800.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalnins A (2018) Multicollinearity: How common factors cause Type 1 errors in multivariate regression. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2362–2385.Google Scholar
  • Kapoor R, Lee JM (2013) Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management J. 34(3):274–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karim S (2006) Modularity in organizational structure: The reconfiguration of internally developed and acquired business units. Strategic Management J. 27(9):799–823.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karnani A, Wernerfelt B (1985) Multiple point competition. Strategic Management J. 6(1):87–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T, Rivkin JW (2001) Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. 22(1):45–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T, Yafeh Y (2007) Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites? J. Econom. Literature 45(2):331–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim H (2010) Business groups in South Korea. Colpan AM, Hikino T, Lincoln JR, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 157–179.Google Scholar
  • Kim J, Mahoney JT (2005) Property rights theory, transaction costs theory, and agency theory: An organizational economics approach to strategic management. Management Decision Econom. 26(4):223–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S, Graddy E (1990) The evolution of new industries and the determinants of market structure. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):27–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knickerbocker FT (1973) Oligopolistic reaction and multinational enterprise. Internat. Executive 15(2):7–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemelin A (1982) Relatedness in the patterns of interindustry diversification. Rev. Econom. Statist. 64(4):646–657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemmon ML, Lins KV (2003) Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. J. Finance 58(4):1445–1468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, Workiewicz M (2018) When two bosses are better than one: Nearly decomposable systems and organizational adaptation. Organ. Sci. 29(2):207–224.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lévy-Leboyer M (1980) The large corporation in modern France. Chandler A, Daems H, eds. Managerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial Enterprise (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), 117–160.Google Scholar
  • Lin C, Ma Y, Xuan Y (2011) Ownership structure and financial constraints: Evidence from a structural estimation. J. Financial Econom. 102(2):416–431.Google Scholar
  • Mahmood IP, Zhu H, Zaheer A (2017) Centralization of intragroup equity ties and performance of business group affiliates. Strategic Management J. 38(5):1082–1100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Makadok R, Coff R (2009) Both market and hierarchy: An incentive-system theory of hybrid governance forms. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2):297–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mani D, Moody J (2014) Moving beyond stylized economic network models: The hybrid world of the Indian firm ownership network. Amer. J. Sociol. 119(8):1629–1669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Masulis RW, Pham PK, Zein J (2011) Family business groups around the world: Costs and benefits of pyramids. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(11):3556–3600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menz M, Kunisch S, Collis DJ (2015) The corporate headquarters in the contemporary corporation: Advancing a multimarket firm perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):633–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mercadal B, Janin P, Charvériat A, Couret A (2004) Droit des Affaires: Sociétés Commerciales (Editions Francis Lefebvre, Levallois, France).Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J (1992) Economics, Organizations and Management (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Montgomery CA, Hariharan S (1991) Diversified expansion by large established firms. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 15(1):71–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Natividad G, Rawley E (2016) Interdependence and performance: A natural experiment in firm scope. Strategy Sci. 1(1):12–31.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Neubauer S (2001) Multimarket Contact and Organizational Design (Deutscher Universitats-Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S, Wernerfelt B (2012) On the grouping of tasks into firms: Make-or-buy with interdependent parts. J. Econom. Management Strategy 21(1):53–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Sullivan M (2003) The political economy of comparative corporate governance. Rev. Internat. Political Econom. 10(1):23–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palich LE, Cardinal LB, Miller CC (2000) Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management J. 21(2):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Panzar JC, Willig RD (1981) Economies of scope. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(2):268–272.Google Scholar
  • Parker PM, Röller L-H (1997) Collusive conduct in duopolies: Multimarket contact and cross-ownership in the mobile telephone industry. RAND J. Econom. 28(2):304–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L (1995) Influence activities and strategic coordination: Two distinctions of internal and external markets. Management Sci. 41(12):1845–1859.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porter ME (1987) From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 65(3):43–59.Google Scholar
  • Prince JT, Simon DH (2009) Multimarket contact and service quality: Evidence from on-time performance in the U.S. airline industry. Acad. Management J. 52(2):336–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Vanneste B (2016) Corporate Strategy: Tools for Analysis and Decision-Making (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ray G, Xue L, Barney JB (2013) Impact of information technology capital on firm scope and performance: The role of asset characteristics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):1125–1147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rawley E (2010) Diversification, coordination costs, and organizational rigidity: Evidence from microdata. Strategic Management J. 31(8):873–891.Google Scholar
  • Sakhartov AV, Folta TB (2014) Resource relatedness, redeployability, and firm value. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1781–1797.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott JT (1991) Multimarket contact among diversified oligopolists. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 9(2):225–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Semadeni M, Cannella AA (2011) Examining the performance effects of post spin-off links to parent firms: Should the apron strings be cut? Strategic Management J. 32(10):1083–1098.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sengul M, Dimitriadis S (2015) Multimarket competition. J. Organ. Design 4(3):18–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sengul M, Gimeno J (2013) Constrained delegation: Limiting subsidiaries’ decision rights and resources in firms that compete across multiple industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):420–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sengul M, Obloj T (2017) Better safe than sorry: Subsidiary performance feedback and internal governance in multiunit firms. J. Management 43(8):2526–2554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sengul M, Workiewicz M (2024) Co-parenting in multi-subsidiary firms. Acad. Management, ePub ahead of print July 24, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.10782abstract.Google Scholar
  • Sengul M, Almeida Costa A, Gimeno J (2019) The allocation of capital within firms. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):43–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shi W, Hoskisson RE (2021) Understanding and Managing Strategic Governance (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Siegel J, Choudhury P (2012) A reexamination of tunneling and business groups: New data and new methods. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(6):1763–1798.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonsohn U (2018) Two lines: A valid alternative to the invalid testing of u-shaped relationships with quadratic regressions. Adv. Methods Practices Psych. Sci. 1(4):538–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sohn M-W (2001) Distance and cosine measures of niche overlap. Soc. Networks 23(2):141–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stark D, Vedres B (2006) Social times of network spaces: Network sequences and foreign investment in Hungary. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(5):1367–1411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein JC (1988) Takeover threats and managerial myopia. J. Political Econom. 96(1):61–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephan J, Boeker W (2001) Getting to multimarket competition: How multimarket contact affects firms’ market entry decisions. Adv. Strategic Management 18:229–261.Google Scholar
  • Stephan J, Murmann JP, Boeker W, Goodstein J (2003) Bringing managers into theories of multimarket competition: CEOs and the determinants of market entry. Organ. Sci. 14(4):403–421.Google Scholar
  • Teece DJ (1980) Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 1(3):223–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsao SM, Chen GZ (2012) The impact of internationalization on performance and innovation: The moderating effects of ownership concentration. Asia Pacific J. Management 29:617–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vroom G, Gimeno J (2007) Ownership form, managerial incentives, and the intensity of rivalry. Acad. Management J. 50(4):901–922.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang K-P, Schwarz GM (2016) A multilevel analysis of the performance implications of excess control in business groups. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1219–1236.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ye G, Priem RL, Alshwer AA (2012) Achieving demand-side synergy from strategic diversification: How combining mundane assets can leverage consumer utilities. Organ. Sci. 23(1):207–224.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yiu DW, Lu Y, Bruton GD, Hoskisson RE (2007) Business groups: An integrated model to focus future research. J. Management Stud. 44(8):1551–1579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu T, Cannella AA Jr (2007) Rivalry between multinational enterprises: An event history approach. Acad. Management J. 50(3):665–686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu T, Cannella AA Jr (2013) A comprehensive review of multimarket competition research. J. Management 39(1):76–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu T, Subramaniam M, Cannella AA Jr (2009) Rivalry deterrence in international markets: Contingencies governing the mutual forbearance hypothesis. Acad. Management J. 52(1):127–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A, Castañer X, Souder D (2013) Synergy sources, target autonomy, and integration in acquisitions. J. Management 39(3):604–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management J. 32(6):624–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou YM (2013) Designing for complexity: Using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ. Sci. 24(2):339–355.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou YM (2015) Supervising across borders: The case of multinational hierarchies. Organ. Sci. 26(1):277–292.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.