Manufacturing Popularity: An Ecological Model of Time-Based Competition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2022.0157

References

  • Abbott A (1988) Transcending general linear reality. Sociol. Theory 6(2):169–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A (2001) Time Matters: On Theory and Method (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):586–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand N, Peterson RA (2000) When market information constitutes fields: Sensemaking of markets in the commercial music industry. Organ. Sci. 11(3):270–284.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Askin N, Mauskapf M (2017) What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(5):910–944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Åstebro T, Michela JL (2005) Predictors of the survival of innovations. J. Production Innov. Management 22(4):322–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett WP, Freeman J (2001) Too much of a good thing? Product proliferation and organizational failure. Organ. Sci. 12(5):539–558.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bayus BL (1998) An analysis of product lifetimes in a technologically dynamic industry. Management Sci. 44(6):763–775.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bayus BL, Putsis WP Jr (1999) Product proliferation: An empirical analysis of product line determinants and market outcomes. Marketing Sci. 18(2):137–153.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Hounschild PR, Phillips DJ (2004) Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. 15(3):259–275.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Le Mens G (2009) How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(20):8146–8150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Lertwachara K, Marsden JR, Telang R (2007) The effect of digital sharing technologies on music markets: A survival analysis of albums on ranking charts. Management Sci. 53(9):1359–1374.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon GP, Swinney R (2011) The value of fast fashion: Quick response, enhanced design, and strategic consumer behavior. Management Sci. 57(4):778–795.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) The Demography of Corporation and Industries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Khessina OM, McKendrick DG (2010) The social lives of products: Analyzing product demography for management theory and practice. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):157–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caves RE (2000) Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Chisholm DC, Norman G (2006) When to exit a product: Evidence from the U.S. motion-picture exhibition market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(2):57–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crossley N (2015) Networks of Sound, Style, and Subversion: The Punk and Post-Punk Worlds of Manchester, London, Liverpool, and Sheffield, 1975–80 (Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Figueiredo JM, Kyle MK (2006) Surviving the gales of creative destruction: The determinants of product turnover. Strategic Management J. 27(3):241–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, Kovács B (2020) The ecology of management concepts. Strategy Sci. 5(4):293–310.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dowd TJ (2004) Production perspectives in the sociology of music. Poetics 32(3–4):235–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):504–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Etzion D (2014) Diffusion as classification. Organ. Sci. 25(2):420–437.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M (2012) Gangnam Style, dissected: The subversive message within South Korea’s music video sensation. Atlantic (August 23), https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/08/gangnam-style-dissected-the-subversive-message-within-south-koreas-music-video-sensation/261462/.Google Scholar
  • Goldberg A (2011) Mapping shared understandings using relational class analysis: The case of the cultural omnivore reexamined. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(5):1397–1436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golder PN, Tellis GJ (2004) Growing, growing, gone: Cascades, diffusion, and turning points in the product life cycle. Marketing Sci. 23(2):207–218.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenstein SM, Wade JB (1998) The product life cycle in the commercial mainframe computer market, 1968–1982. RAND J. Econom. 29(4):772–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G, Hannan MT (2005) Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 16(5):474–490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iizuka T (2007) An empirical analysis of planned obsolescence. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(1):191–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M, Kim H, Kim BK (2012) Meeting expectations: A role-theoretic perspective on reputation. Barnett ML, Pollock TG, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 140–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B, MacDonald GM (1994) The life cycle of a competitive industry. J. Political Econom. 102(2):322–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khessina OM, Carroll GR (2008) Product demography of de novo and de alio firms in the optical disk drive industry, 1983–1999. Organ. Sci. 19(1):25–38.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Khessina OM, Reis S (2016) The limits of reflected glory: The beneficial and harmful effects of product name similarity in the U.S. network TV program industry, 1944–2003. Organ. Sci. 27(2):411–427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S (1996) Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):562–583.Google Scholar
  • Lambkin M, Day GS (1989) Evolutionary processes in competitive markets: Beyond the product life cycle. J. Marketing 53(3):4–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lena JC (2012) Banding Together: How Communities Create Genres in Popular Music (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McIntyre H (2018) Will BTS score two no. 1 albums in the same year with their new release ‘Love Yourself: Answer’? Forbes (August 1), https://www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2018/08/01/will-bts-score-two-no-1-albums-in-the-same-year-with-their-new-release-love-yourself-answer/?sh=221357c877f4.Google Scholar
  • Merton RK (1984) Socially expected durations: A case study of concept formation in sociology. Powell WW, Robbins R, eds. Conflict and Consensus: A Festschrift in Honor of Lewis A. Coser (Free Press, New York), 262–283.Google Scholar
  • Peterson RA, Berger DG (1975) Cycles in symbol production: The case of popular music. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 40(2):158–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson RA, Berger DG (1996) Measuring industry concentration, diversity, and innovation in popular music. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(1):175–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter ME (2008) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rhee M, Kim SH, Barnett WP (2015) SM entertainment. Stanford Graduate School of Business Case Study IB-108, Stanford University, Stanford, CT.Google Scholar
  • Rich N (2015) Hit charade: Meet the bald Norwegians and other unknowns who actually create the songs that top the charts. Atlantic (October), https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/10/hit-charade/403192/.Google Scholar
  • Rossman G (2015) Climbing the Charts: What Radio Airplay Tells Us About the Diffusion of Innovation (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) An experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seabrook J (2015) The Song Machine: Inside the Hit Factory (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sorenson O (2000) Letting the market work for you: An evolutionary perspective on product strategy. Strategic Management J. 21(5):577–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D, Macy MW (2001) In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):147–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu B, Knott AM (2006) Entrepreneurial risk and market entry. Management Sci. 52(9):1315–1330.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.