Commitment and Competitive Advantage in a Digital World

References

• Argyres N, Liebeskind JP (1999) Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction costs theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):49–63. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumol W, Panzar J, Willig R (1982) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C (2021) Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(2):265–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1331–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudary SP (2021) Platform Scale for a Post-Pandemic World (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T (2007) Winner-take-all in networked markets. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (October) 92Google Scholar
• Eocman L, Jeho L, Jongseok L (2006) Reconsideration of the winner take all hypothesis: Complex networks and local bias. Management Sci. 52(12):1838–1848.Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 43(7):1239–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2021) Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning 54(5): 102045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano M (2014) Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. J. Product Innovation Management 31(3):417–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Phillips N (2013) Institutional work as logics shift: The case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Organ. Stud. 34(8):1035–1071.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (1991) Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P, Del Sol P (1998) Commitment vs. flexibility? California Management Rev. 40(4):26–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Sci. 59(4):933–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Helmond A, Nieborg DB, van der Vlist FN (2019) Facebook’s evolution: Development of a platform-as-infrastructure, Internet Histories, 3(2): 123–146.Google Scholar
• Leyden B (2021) Platform design and innovation incentives: Evidence from the product ratings system on Apple’s App Store. Working Paper No. 9113, CESifo, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Libert B, Beck M, Wind Y (2016) How to navigate a digital transformation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (June 22), https://hbr.org/2016/06/how-to-navigate-a-digital-transformation.Google Scholar
• McIntyre D, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management J. 38(1):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Siegel D, Kenney M (2018) On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 12(3):354–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Oberholzer-Gee F, Yao D (2013) Market imperfections and sustainable competitive advantage. Thomas CR, Shughart WF, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Managerial Economics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA (1992) A review of Ghemawat’s Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 1(3):575–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pidun U, Reeves M, Schüssler M (2020) How do you “design” a business ecosystem? Accessed April 16, 2022, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/how-do-you-design-a-business-ecosystem.Google Scholar
• Pidun U, Reeves R, Wesselink E (2021) How healthy is your business ecosystem? MIT Sloan Management Rev. 62(3):31–38.Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling M (2021) Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. J. Management 47(6):1528–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritter T, Lettl C (2018) The wider implications of business model research. Long Range Planning 51(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelling T (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Scherer FM (1992) Reviewed work(s): Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy by Pankaj Ghemawat. Bus. Hist. Rev. 66(3):616–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmeiss J, Hoelzle K, Tech R (2019) Designing governance mechanisms in platform ecosystems: Addressing the paradox of openness through blockchain technology. California Management Rev. 62(1):121–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research Commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Uzunca B, Sharapov D, Tee R (2022) Goverance rigidity, industry evolution, and value capture in platform ecosystems. Working paper, Esade, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona.Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne M, Parger G, Choudary SP (2016) Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (April) 54–62.Google Scholar
• West J (2003) How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy 32(7):1259–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu M (2017) Quirky, the failure of invention crowdsourcing. Accessed April 16, 2022, https://digital.hbs.edu/platform-digit/submission/quirky-the-failure-of-invention-crowdsourcing/.Google Scholar
• Wu A, Na C (2020) Microsoft Azure and the cloud wars. Harvard Business School Case No.9-720-409, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Yoffie D, Ciechanover AM (2019) Upwork in 2019. Harvard Business School Case No. 9-719-509, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Von Delft S, Morgan Thomas A, Buck T (2020) The evolution of platform business models: Exploring competitive battles in the world of platforms. Long Range Planning 53(4):101892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Iansiti M (2019) Why some platforms thrive and others don’t. Harvard Bus. Rev. (January–February) 118–125.Google Scholar