Structural Causal Modeling of Managerial Interventions: What If Managers Had Not Intervened by Doing This?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2022.0169

References

  • Abbott A (1998) The causal devolution. Sociol. Methods Res. 27(2):148–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ackermann J (2019) The effect of franchising on store performance: Evidence from an ownership change. Management Sci. 65(11):5188–5196.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aggarwal VA, Wu B (2015) Organizational constraints to adaptation: Intrafirm asymmetry in the locus of coordination. Organ. Sci. 26(1):218–238.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aguinis H, Edwards JR, Bradley KJ (2017) Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research. Organ. Res. Methods 20(4):665–685.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres NS, Bigelow L (2007) Does transaction misalignment matter for firm survival at all stages of the industry life cycle? Management Sci. 53(8):1332–1344.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres NS, Liebeskind JP (1999) Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):49–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres NS, Zenger TR (2012) Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1643–1657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres NS, Rios LA, Silverman BS (2020) Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: Formal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 41(11):2015–2049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettis RA (2012) The search for asterisks: Compromised statistical tests and flawed theories. Strategic Management J. 33(1):108–113.Google Scholar
  • Bettis RA, Ethiraj S, Gambardella A, Helfat C, Mitchell W (2016a) Creating repeatable cumulative knowledge in strategic management: A call for a broad and deep conversation among authors, referees, and editors. Strategic Management J. 37(2):257–261.Google Scholar
  • Bettis RA, Helfat CE, Shaver JM (2016b) The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strategic Management J. Special Issue: Replication in Strategic Management 37(11):2193–2203.Google Scholar
  • Brouthers KD, Brouthers LE, Werner S (2003) Transaction cost‐enhanced entry mode choices and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 24(12):1239–1248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunge M (2004) How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philos. Soc. Sci. 34(2):182–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang SJ, Chung J, Moon JJ (2013) When do wholly owned subsidiaries perform better than joint ventures? Strategic Management J. 34(3):317–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S, Kogut B, Yang JS (2016) Global diversification discount and its discontents: A bit of self‐selection makes a world of difference. Strategic Management J. 37(11):2254–2274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durand R, Vaara E (2009) Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1245–1264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellsaesser F, Tsang EW, Runde J (2014) Models of causal inference: Imperfect but applicable is better than perfect but inapplicable. Strategic Management J. 35(10):1541–1551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elwert F, Winship C (2014) Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Rev. Sociol. 40:31–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fritz MS, Kenny DA, MacKinnon DP (2016) The combined effects of measurement error and omitting confounders in the single-mediator model. Multivariate Behav. Res. 51(5):681–697.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guler I (2018) Pulling the plug: The capability to terminate unsuccessful projects and firm performance. Strategy Sci. 3(3):481–497.Google Scholar
  • Handley SM (2017) How governance misalignment and outsourcing capability impact performance. Production Oper. Management 26(1):134–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann. Econom. Soc. Measurement 5(4):475–492.Google Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hernandez E, Shaver JM (2019) Network synergy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):171–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hicks R, Tingley D (2011) Causal mediation analysis. The Stata J. 11(4):605–619.Google Scholar
  • Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T (2010) Identification, inference, and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statist. Sci. 25(1):51–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D, Yamamoto T (2011) Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 105(4):765–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keele L, Tingley D, Yamamoto T (2015) Identifying mechanisms behind policy interventions via causal mediation analysis. J. Policy Analysis and Management 34(4):937–963.Google Scholar
  • Keum DD, See KE (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kosová R, Lafontaine F, Perrigot R (2013) Organizational form and performance: Evidence from the hotel industry. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(4):1303–1323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leiblein MJ, Miller DJ (2003) An empirical examination of transaction‐and firm‐level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management J. 24(9):839–859.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leiblein MJ, Reuer J, Dalsace F (2002) Do make or buy decisions matter? The influence of organizational governance on technological performance. Strategic Management J. 23(9):817–833.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCormack A, Mishra A (2015) Managing the performance trade‐offs from partner integration: Implications of contract choice in R&D projects. Production Oper. Management 24(10):1552–1569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKinnon DP (2008) Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York).Google Scholar
  • Masten SE (1993) Transaction costs, mistakes, and performance: Assessing the importance of governance. Management Decision Econom. 14:119–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Masten SE, Meehan JW, Snyder EA (1991) The costs of organization. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7(1):1–25.Google Scholar
  • Mayer KJ, Nickerson JA (2005) Antecedents and performance implications of contracting for knowledge workers: Evidence from information technology services. Organ. Sci. 16(3):225–242.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan SL, Winship C (2015) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Muthén B, Asparouhov T (2015) Causal effects in mediation modeling: An introduction with applications to latent variables. Structural Equation Model. 22(1):12–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Natividad G, Rawley E (2016) Interdependence and performance: A natural experiment in firm scope. Strategy Sci. 1(1):12–31.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Argyres N (2018) Strategizing before strategic decision making. Strategy Sci. 3(4):592–605.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Silverman BS (2003a) Why aren’t all truck drivers owner‐operators? Asset ownership and the employment relation in interstate for‐hire trucking. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(1):91–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Silverman BS (2003b) Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance and adaptation in a regulated industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):433–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S, Stern S (2008) How does outsourcing affect performance dynamics? Evidence from the automobile industry. Management Sci. 54(12):1963–1979.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parmigiani A, Holloway SS (2011) Actions speak louder than modes: Antecedents and implications of parent implementation capabilities on business unit performance. Strategic Management J. 32(5):457–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2009a) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2009b) Causal inference in statistics: An overview. Statist. Surveys 3:96–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2010) The foundations of causal inference. Sociol. Methodology 40:75–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2011) Errata: The foundations of causal inference. Sociol. Methodology 41:373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2012) The causal mediation formula—A guide to the assessment of pathways and mechanisms. Prevention Sci. 13(4):426–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2014a) Interpretation and identification of causal mediation. Psych. Methods 19(4):459–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2014b) Reply to commentary by Imai, Keele, Tingley, and Yamamoto concerning causal mediation analysis. Psych. Methods. 19(4):488–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J (2019) The seven tools of causal inference, with reflections on machine learning. Comm. ACM 62(3):54–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J, Mackenzie D (2018) The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pearl J, Glymour M, Jewell NP (2016) Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer (Wiley, West Sussex, UK).Google Scholar
  • Pisano GP (2017) Toward a prescriptive theory of dynamic capabilities: Connecting strategic choice, learning, and competition. Indust. Corporate Change 26(5):747–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ (2015) Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Rev. Psych. 66:825–852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramey C, O’Keeffe K (2020) Huawei faces racketeering charge. Wall Street Journal (February 14), A1.Google Scholar
  • Robins JM, Greenland S (1992) Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 3(2):143–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sampson RC (2004) The cost of misaligned governance in R&D alliances. J. Law Econom. Organ. 20:484–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver JM (1998) Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. 44(4):571–585.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver JM (2005) Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. J. Management 31(3):330–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver JM (2020) Causal identification through a cumulative body of research in the study of strategy and organizations. J. Management 46(7):1244–1256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver JM (2021) Evolution of quantitative research methods in strategic management. Duhaime IM, Hitt MA, Lyles MA, eds. Strategic Management: State of the Field and Its Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 83–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silverman BS, Nickerson JA, Freeman J (1997) Profitability, transactional alignment, and organizational mortality in the US trucking industry. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):31–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spirtes P (2010) Introduction to causal inference. J. Machine Learning Res. 11:1643–1662.Google Scholar
  • Spirtes P, Glymour C, Scheines R (2000) Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH (2011) Reflections on research for theory and practice: From an engaged scholarship perspective. Mohrman SA, Lawler EE III, eds. Useful Research: Advancing Theory and Practice (Berrett-Koehler, Oakland, CA), 387–406.Google Scholar
  • VanderWeele TJ (2015) Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Williamson OE (1996) The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yvrande-Billon A, Saussier S (2005) Do Organization Choices Matter? Assessing the Importance of Governance Through Performance Comparisons. New Ideas in Contracting and Organizational Researches (Nova Science, Hauppauge, NY).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.