The Varying Returns to Diversification Along the Value Chain

References

• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10:123–168.Google Scholar
• Austin BA, Gordon TF (1987) Movie genres: Toward a conceptualized model and standardized definitions. Austin BA, ed. Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics, and Law (Praeger, Westport, CT), 3:12–33.Google Scholar
• Balio T, ed. (1985) The American Film Industry (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI).Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basuroy S, Desai KK, Talukdar D (2006) An empirical investigation of signaling in the motion picture industry. J. Marketing Res. 43(2):287–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Steenkamp J-BEM (2001) Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):143–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baysinger B, Hoskisson RE (1989) Diversification strategy and R&D intensity in multiproduct firms. Acad. Management J. 32(2):310–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryce DJ, Winter SG (2009) A general interindustry relatedness index. Management Sci. 55(9):1570–1585.Link, Google Scholar
• Campa JM, Kedia S (2002) Explaining the diversification discount. J. Finance 62(4):1731–1762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardenas CE, McCarroll RE, Court LE, Elgohari BA, Elhalawani H, Fuller CD, Kamal MJ, et al. (2018) Deep learning algorithm for auto-delineation of high-risk oropharyngeal clinical target volumes with built-in dice similarity coefficient parameter optimization function. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology 101(2):468–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson SJ, John G (2013) A theoretical and empirical investigation of property rights sharing in outsourced research, development, and engineering relationships. Strategic Management J. 34(9):1065–1085.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler ADJ (1977) The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chandler ADJ (1990) Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M, Kaul A, Wu B (2019) Adaptation across multiple landscapes: Relatedness, complexity, and the long run effects of coordination in diversified firms. Strategic Management J. 40(11):1791–1821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cottrell T, Nault BA (2004) Product variety and firm survival in the microcomputer software industry. Strategic Management J. 25(10):1005–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmestri G, Montanari F, Usai A (2005) Reputation and strength of ties in predicting commercial success and artistic merit of independents in the Italian feature film industry. J. Management Stud. 42(5):975–1002.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai MA, Loeb GJ, Veblen MF (2002) The strategy and sources of motion picture finance. Harvard Business School Note 9-203-007, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• De Silva I (1998) Consumer selection of motion pictures. Litman BR, ed. The Motion Picture Mega Industry (Allyn Bacon, Needham Heights, MA), 144–171.Google Scholar
• DeVany AS, Walls WD (2002) Does Hollywood make too many R-rated movies? Risk, stochastic dominance, and the illusion of expectation. J. Bus. 75(3):425–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar T, Sun G, Weinberg C (2012) The long-term box office performance of sequel movies. Marketing Lett. 23(1):13–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodds JC, Holbrook MB (1988) What’s an Oscar worth? An empirical estimation of the effects of nominations and awards on movie distribution and revenues. Austin BA, ed. Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics, and Law (Praeger, Westport, CT), 4:72–87.Google Scholar
• Doi N (1985) Diversification and R&D activity in Japanese manufacturing firms. Manage. Decision Econom. 6(3):147–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elberse A (2007) The power of stars: Do star actors drive the success of movies? J. Mark. 71(October):102–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J, Elberse A, Leenders MA (2006) The motion picture industry: Critical issues in practice, current research, and new research directions. Marketing Sci. 25(6):638–661.Link, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J, Hui K, Zhang J (2007) From story line to box office: A new approach for green-lighting movie scripts. Management Sci. 53(6):881–893.Link, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M, Lai L (1997) Similarity judgments in strategy formulation: Role, process and implications. Strategic Management J. 18(4):255–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farsiu S, Loo J, Duncan JL, Birch DG, Jaffe GJ (2020) Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of intact ellipsoid zone area on optical coherence tomography images of USH2A-related retinal degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology Visual Sci. 61(7):485.Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Haleblian J (2002) Understanding acquisition performance: The role of transfer effects. Organ. Sci. 13(1):36–47.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL (1981) The measurement of interrater agreement. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York), 212–236.Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A, Giarratana MS, Sebrek SS (2020) Resource partitioning and strategies in markets for technology. Strategic Organ. 18(2):251–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garen J (1984) The returns to schooling: A selectivity bias approach with a continuous choice variable. Econometrica 52(5):1199–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge L, Konana P, Tanriverdi H (2004) Global sourcing and value chain unbundling. Working paper, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
• Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1999) The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (1997) Know‐how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management J. 18(5):339–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1996) Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND J. Econom. 27(1):32–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau T, Houston MB, Heitjans T (2009) Conceptualizing and measuring the monetary value of brand extensions: The case of motion pictures. J. Marketing 73(6):167–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA (1988) Strategic control systems and relative R&D investment in large multiproduct firms. Strategic Management J. 9(6):605–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen JJ, Simsek Z, Cao Q (2012) Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes. Strategic Management J. 33(11):1286–1303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Mao H (2014) Adapting to succeed? Leveraging the brand equity of best sellers to succeed at the box office. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40:558–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang SJ (1992) A mixed linear model for unbalanced two-way crossed multilevel data with estimation via the EM algorithm. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
• Karniouchina EV (2011) Impact of star and movie buzz on motion picture distribution and box office revenue. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 28(1):62–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karniouchina EV, Uslay C, Erenburg G (2011) Do marketing media have life cycles? The case of product placement in movies. J. Mark. 75:27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karniouchina EV, Carson S, Short J, Ketchen D (2013) Extending the firm vs. industry debate: Does industry lifecycle stage matter? Strategic Management J. 34(8):1010–1018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King T (2001) Are three ‘rings’ better than one? Wall Street Journal (April 27). https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB98832056165499407.Google Scholar
• Kosman E, Leonard KJ (2005) Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species. Molecular Ecology 14(2):415–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Monica PR (2007) And the Oscar goes to…who cares? CNNMoney.com (February 21), https://money.cnn.com/2007/02/21/commentary/mediabiz/index.htm.Google Scholar
• Leonard‐Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard‐Barton D (1995) Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Wu B (2010) Opportunity costs and non-scale free capabilities: Profit maximization, corporate scope, and profit margins. Strategic Management J. 31(7):780–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li SX, Greenwood R (2004) The effect of within-industry diversification on firm performance: Synergy creation, multi-market contact, and market structuration. Strategic Management J. 25(12):1131–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litman B (1983) Predicting the success of theatrical movies: An empirical study. J. Popular Culture 16(4):159–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackey TB, Barney JB, Dotson JP (2017) Corporate diversification and the value of individual firms: A Bayesian approach. Strategic Management J. 38(2):322–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannor MJ, Shamsie J, Conlon DE (2016) Does experience help or hinder top managers? Working with different types of resources in Hollywood. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1330–1340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mast G (1992) A Short History of the Movies (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Westphal JD (2003) Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles G, Snow CC, Sharfman MP (1993) Industry variety and performance. Strategic Management J. 14(3):163–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (2006) Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 27(7):601–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Shamsie J (1996) The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Acad. Management J. 39(3):519–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misangyi VF, Elms H, Greckhamer T, Lepine JA (2006) A new perspective on a fundamental debate: A multilevel approach to industry, corporate, and business unit effects. Strategic Management J. 27(6):571–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mittal V, Anderson EW, Sayrak A, Tadikamalla P (2005) Dual emphasis and the long-term financial impact of customer satisfaction. Marketing Sci. 24(4):544–555.Link, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B (1988) Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin’s q. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):623–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore AJ, Moore WL, Baldwin BG (2014) Genetic and ecotypic differentiation in a Californian plant polyploid complex (Grindelia, Asteraceae). PLoS One 9(4):e95656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neelamegham R, Chintagunta P (1999) A Bayesian model to forecast new product performance in domestic and international markets. Marketing Sci. 18(2):115–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Neffke F, Henning M (2013) Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management J. 34(3):297–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RA, Donihue MR, Waldman D, Wheaton C (2001) What’s an Oscar worth? Econom. Inquiry 39(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen S (2009) Why do top management teams look the way they do? A multilevel exploration of the antecedents of TMT heterogeneity. Strategic Organ. 7(3):277–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palich LE, Cardinal LB, Miller CC (2000) Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management J. 21(2):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter E, Fabrikant G (2006) A big star may not a profitable movie make. New York Times (August 28), https://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/28/business/media/28cast.html.Google Scholar
• Prag J, Casavant J (1994) An empirical study of the determinants of revenues and marketing expenditures in the motion picture industry. J. Cultural Econom. 18:217–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Ravid SA (1999) Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. J. Bus. 72(4):463–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravid SA (2003) Are they all crazy or just risk averse? Some movie puzzles and possible solutions. Ginsburgh V, ed. Economics of Art and Culture Invited Papers at the 12th Internat. Conf. Assoc. Cultural Econom. Internat., vol. 260 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 33–47.Google Scholar
• Ravid SA, Basuroy S (2004) Executive objective function, the R-rated puzzle and the production of violent films. J. Bus. 77(2):S155–S192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE (2014) Even the rich can make themselves poor: A critical examination of IV methods in marketing applications. Marketing Sci. 33(5):655–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Sawhney MS, Eliashberg J (1996) A parsimonious model for forecasting gross box-office revenues of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. 15(2):113–131.Link, Google Scholar
• Scott JT, Pascoe G (1987) Purposive diversification of R&D in manufacturing. J. Indust. Econom. 36(2):193–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short JC, Ketchen DJ Jr, Palmer TB, Hult GTM (2007) Firm, strategic group, and industry influences on performance. Strategic Management J. 28(2):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1985) What we know about the creative process. Kuhn RL, ed. Frontiers in Creative and Innovative Management (Ballinger, New York), 3–22.Google Scholar
• Smith SP, Smith VK (1986) Successful movies—a preliminary empirical analysis. Appl. Econom. 18:501–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen T (1948) A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 5(4):1–34.Google Scholar
• Sorescu AB, Spanjol J (2008) Innovation’s effect on firm value and risk: Insights from consumer packaged goods. J. Marketing 72(2):114–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J-BEM, Hofstede F, Wedel M (1999) A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. J. Marketing 63(2):55–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern I, Henderson A (2004) Within business diversification in technology-intensive industries. Strategic Management J. 25(5):487–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swaminathan A (2001) Resource partitioning and the evolution of specialist organizations: The role of location and identity in the US wine industry. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1169–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanabe Y, Ishida T, Eto H, Sera T, Emoto Y (2019) Evaluation of the correlation between prostatic displacement and rectal deformation using the Dice similarity coefficient of the rectum. Medical Dosimetry 44(4):e39–e43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H, Lee C (2008) Within-industry diversification and firm performance in the presence of network externalities: Evidence from the software industry. Acad. Management J. 51(2):381–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uslay C, Altintig ZA, Winsor RD (2010) An empirical examination of the “rule of three”: Strategy implications for top management, marketers, and investors. J. Marketing 74(2):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verona G (1999) A resource-based view of product development. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):132–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villalonga B (2004) Does diversification cause the “diversification discount”? Financial Management 33(2):5–27.Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5:171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willig RD (1979) Multiproduct technology and market structure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 69(2):346–351.Google Scholar
• Yanadori Y, Marler JH (2006) Compensation strategy: Does business strategy influence compensation in high‐technology firms? Strategic Management J. 27(6):559–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young SM, Gong JJ, Van der Stede WA (2008) The business of making movies. Strategic Finance (February), 26–32.Google Scholar
• Zahavi T, Lavie D (2013) Intra-industry diversification and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 34(8):978–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zufryden F (1996) Linking advertising to box office performance of new film releases—A marketing planning model. J. Advertising Res. 36(4):29–41.Google Scholar