Broken Effects? How to Reduce False Positives in Panel Regressions
References
- (2017) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? NBER Working Paper No. 24003, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2018) Applying random coefficient models to strategy research: Identifying and exploring firm heterogeneous effects. Strategy Sci. 3(3):533–553.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Bias reduction in standard errors for linear regression with multi-stage samples. Survey Methodology 28(2):169–182.Google Scholar
- (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Bridging methodological divides between macro-and microresearch: Endogeneity and methods for panel data. J. Management 46(1):70–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):414–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Strategy research and panel data: Evidence and implications. J. Management 32(3):449–471.Google Scholar
- (2017) A tale of two effects: Using longitudinal data to compare within-and between-firm effects. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1536–1556.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 89(2):221–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: Significance tests & mistaken inference. Strategic Management J. 37(1):167–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Econometric Analysis, 8th ed. (Pearson).Google Scholar
- (2019). Permutation inference with a finite number of heterogeneous clusters. Preprint, submitted July 1, https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.01049.Google Scholar
- (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Econometrics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2(8):e124.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Multicollinearity: How common factors cause type 1 errors in multivariate regression. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2362–2385.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Learning from testimony on quantitative research in management. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) The persistence of shocks to profitability. Rev. Econom. Statist. 81(1):143–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Open Science Collaboration et al. (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251):aac4716.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Interpreting interactions in linear fixed-effect regression models: When fixed-effect estimates are no longer within-effects. Strategy Sci. 4(1):25–40.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Binned scatterplots: A simple tool to make research easier and better. Strategic Management J. 41(12):2261–2274.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management J. 33(8):885–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Performance persistence in the presence of higher-order resources. Strategic Management J. 40(2):181–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2009) Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1335–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar

