The Power and Limits of Distributed Representations in Strategic Decision Making

References

• Alpaydin E (2014) Introduction to Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Anderson PG, Tarder-Stoll H, Alpaslan M, Keathley N, Levin DL, Venkatesh S, Bartel E, et al. (2024) Deep learning improves physician accuracy in the comprehensive detection of abnormalities on chest X-rays. Sci. Rep. 14(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J, Felin T (2013) What are microfoundations? Acad. Management Perspect. 27(2):138–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bishop CM (2006) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
• Bourgeois LJ (1985) Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic-performance in volatile environments. Acad. Management J. 28(3):548–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Box GEP (1979) Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. Launer RL, Wilkinson GN, eds. Robustness in Statistics (Academic Press, New York), 201–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunswik E (1952) The Conceptual Framework of Psychology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17:1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Condorcet JAN (1785/1994) Foundations of Social Choice and Political Theory (E. Elgar, Brookfield, VT).Google Scholar
• Craik KJW (1943) The Nature of Explanation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management J. 33(6):611–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategic representations. Strategy Sci. 3(4):606–619.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Laureiro-Martínez D (2018) Individual and organizational antecedents of strategic foresight: A representational approach. Strategy Sci. 3(3):513–532.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Ostler J (2020) A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1198–1219.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Steinberger T (2022) Organizations as artificial intelligences: The use of artificial intelligence analogies in organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Hinrichs N, Heshmati M (2024) External representations in strategic decision making: Understanding strategy’s reliance on visuals. Strategic Management J. 45(11):2191–2226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dearborn DC, Simon HA (1958) Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry 21(2):140–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Fang C, Levinthal DA (2004) From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning from model-based feedback. Management Sci. 50(10):1366–1378.Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psych. Rev. 100(3):363–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Pedersen T (2016) Microfoundations in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(13):E22–E34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gary MS, Wood RE (2011) Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strategic Management J. 32(6):569–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2007) Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geman S, Bienenstock E, Doursat R (1992) Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Comput. 4(1):1–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J, Kim J, Rajagopalan N (2006) The influence of acquisition experience and performance on acquisition behavior: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Acad. Management J. 49(2):357–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heshmati M, Csaszar FA (2024) Learning strategic representations: Exploring the effects of taking a strategy course. Organ. Sci. 35(2):453–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM, Karelaia N (2007) Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments. Psych. Rev. 114(3):733–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollan J, Hutchins E, Kirsh D (2000) Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human–computer interaction research. ACM Trans. Comput.–Human Interaction 7(2):174–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong L, Page SE (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(46):16385–16389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E (1995) How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Sci. 19(3):265–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2020) Organizational structure, information processing, and decision making: A retrospective and road map for research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):267–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Wilson AJ (2018) The growth of the firm: An attention-based view. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1779–1800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Laureiro-Martínez D, Nigam A, Ocasio W, Rerup C (2024) Research frontiers on the attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Organ. 22(1):6–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kearns MJ, Vazirani UV (1994) An Introduction to Computational Learning Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr NL, Tindale RS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Ann. Rev. Psych. 55(1):623–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keum DD, See KE (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martínez D, Brusoni S (2018) Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision making: Evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision makers. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1031–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Csaszar FA (2020) Cognitive and structural antecedents of innovation: A large-sample study. Strategy Sci. 5(2):71–97.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis MM (2003) Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game (W. W. Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• March JG (2006) Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management J. 27(3):201–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1993) Organizations (John Wiley & Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Martignoni D, Menon A, Siggelkow N (2016) Consequences of misspecified mental models: Contrasting effects and the role of cognitive fit. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2545–2568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masucci M, Parker SC, Brusoni S, Camerani R (2021) How are corporate ventures evaluated and selected? Technovation 99:102–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald D (2014) The Firm: The Story of McKinsey (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Minsky ML, Papert SA (1969) Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nilsson NJ (1965) Learning Machines: Foundations of Trainable Pattern-Classifying Systems (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Norman DA (1993) Things That Make Us Smart (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(Summer Special Issue):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Laamanen T, Vaara E (2018) Communication and attention dynamics: An attention-based view of strategic change. Strategic Management J. 39(1):155–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Rhee L, Boynton D (2020) March and the pursuit of organizational intelligence: The interplay between procedural rationality and sensible foolishness. Industrial Corporate Change 29(1):225–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Aggarwal VA, Posen HE (2022) The aggregation–learning trade-off. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1094–1115.Link, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension (Doubleday, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner F (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search: A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Vanneste BS (2016) Corporate Strategy: Tools for Analysis and Decision Making (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinlan JR (1993) C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA).Google Scholar
• Rhee L, Ocasio W, Kim T-H (2019) Performance feedback in hierarchical business groups: The cross-level effects of cognitive accessibility on R&D search behavior. Organ. Sci. 30(1):51–69.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2021) Shaping possibilities: A design science approach to developing novel strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):800–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1986) The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):716–727.Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1988) Committees, hierarchies and polyarchies. Econom. J. 98(391):451–470.Google Scholar
• Seshadri S, Shapira Z (2003) The flow of ideas and timing of evaluation as determinants of knowledge creation. Industrial Corporate Change 12(5):1099–1124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharapov D, Dahlander L (2025) Selection regimes and selection errors. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print May 14, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17482.Link, Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA, McMullen JS, Ocasio W (2017) Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers’ opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strategic Management J. 38(3):626–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1990) Invariants of human behavior. Ann. Rev. Psych. 41:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA, Chase WG (1973) Skill in chess. Amer. Sci. 61(4):394–403.Google Scholar
• Smith WK (2014) Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1592–1623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart TR (2001) The lens model equation. Hammond KR, Stewart TR, eds. The Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Applications (Oxford University Press, New York), 357–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vapnik VN (1995) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vuori TO, Huy QN (2016) Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: How Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):9–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Winter SG, Szulanski G (2001) Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. 12(6):730–743.Link, Google Scholar