Management by Originals: Inventor CEOs and Firms’ Strategic Change

References

• Acar S, Runco MA (2019) Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory. Psych. Aesthetics Creativity Arts 13(2):153–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Funk P (2012) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Sci. 58(2):219–235.Link, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10(1):123–167.Google Scholar
• Amburgey TL, Dacin T (1994) As the left foot follows the right? The dynamics of strategic and structural change. Acad. Management J. 37(6):1427–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson N, Potočnik K, Zhou J (2014) Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J. Management 40(5):1297–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armenakis AA, Bedeian AG (1999) Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. J. Management 25(3):293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Åstebro T, Jeffrey SA, Adomdza GK (2007) Inventor perseverance after being told to quit: The role of cognitive biases. Behav. Decision Making 20(3):253–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker VL III, Duhaime IM (1997) Strategic change in the turnaround process: Theory and empirical evidence. Strategic Management J. 18(1):13–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker VL III, Mueller GC (2002) CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Sci. 48(6):782–801.Link, Google Scholar
• Barr PS (1998) Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change. Organ. Sci. 9(6):644–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Bednar MK, Boivie S, Prince NR (2013) Burr under the saddle: How media coverage influences strategic change. Organ. Sci. 24(3):910–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Beer M, Eisenstat RA, Spector B (1990) Why change programs don’t produce change. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68(6):158–166.Google Scholar
• Begley TM (1995) Using founder status, age of firm, and company growth rate as the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs from managers of smaller businesses. J. Bus. Venturing 10(3):249–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Begley TM, Boyd DP (1987) Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. J. Bus. Venturing 2(1):79–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bena J, Ferreira MA, Matos P, Pires P (2017) Are foreign investors locusts? The long-term effects of foreign institutional ownership. J. Financial Econom. 126(1):122–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benedek M, Könen T, Neubauer AC (2012) Associative abilities underlying creativity. Psych. Aesthetics Creativity Arts 6(3):273–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentley FS, Kehoe RR (2020) Give them some slack—They’re trying to change! The benefits of excess cash, excess employees, and increased human capital in the strategic change context. Acad. Management J. 63(1):181–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1989) Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Acad. Management J. 32(3):489–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1997) Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Acad. Management J. 40(1):152–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bommer WH, Rich GA, Rubin RS (2005) Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change. J. Organ. Behav. 26(7):733–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonica A (2013) Database on ideology, money in politics, and elections: Public version 1.0 [computer file]. Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Bostan I, Mian GM (2019) Inventor chief executive officers and firm innovation. Internat. Rev. Finance 19(2):247–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bovey WH, Hede A (2001) Resistance to organizational change: The role of cognitive and affective processes. Leadership Organ. Development J. 22(8):372–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brophy DR (2001) Comparing the attributes, activities, and performance of divergent, convergent, and combination thinkers. Creativity Res. J. 13(3–4):439–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Yoon H, Gamache DL, Withers MC (2022) Omitted variable bias: Examining management research with the impact threshold of a confounding variable (ITCV). J. Management 48(1):17–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenitz LW, Barney JB (1997) Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. J. Bus. Venturing 12(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byun S, Fuller K, Lin Z (2021) The costs and benefits associated with inventor CEOs. J. Corporate Finance 71:102094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannella AA Jr, Park JH, Lee HU (2008) Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Acad. Management J. 51(4):768–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carney DR, Jost JT, Gosling SD, Potter J (2008) The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psych. 29(6):807–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Sanders WG, Gregersen HB (2001) Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Acad. Management J. 44(3):493–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cerasoli CP, Nicklin JM, Ford MT (2014) Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 140(4):980–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Busenbark JR, Woo HS, Semadeni M (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2639–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin MK, Semadeni M (2017) CEO political ideologies and pay egalitarianism within top management teams. Strategic Management J. 38(8):1608–1625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin MK, Hambrick DC, Treviño LK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(2):197–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chowdhury SD, Geringer JM (2001) Institutional ownership, strategic choices and corporate efficiency: Evidence from Japan. J. Management Stud. 38(2):271–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen DM, Dhaliwal DS, Boivie S, Graffin SD (2015) Top management conservatism and corporate risk strategies: Evidence from managers’ personal political orientation and corporate tax avoidance. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1918–1938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clapham MM (2001) The effects of affect manipulation and information exposure on divergent thinking. Creativity Res. J. 13(3–4):335–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colangelo N, Assouline S, Kerr B, Huesman R, Johnson D (1993) Mechanical inventiveness: A three phase study. Bock GR, Ackrill K, eds. The Origins and Development of High Ability (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 160–174.Google Scholar
• Conyon MJ (2006) Executive compensation and incentives. Acad. Management Perspect. 20(1):25–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossland C, Zyung J, Hiller NJ, Hambrick DC (2014) CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Acad. Management J. 57(3):652–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui AS, Calantone RJ, Griffith DA (2011) Strategic change and termination of interfirm partnerships. Strategic Management J. 32(4):402–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl MS (2011) Organizational change and employee stress. Management Sci. 57(2):240–256.Link, Google Scholar
• Deb P, David P, O’Brien J (2017) When is cash good or bad for firm performance? Strategic Management J. 38(2):436–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch Y, Keil T, Laamanen T (2011) A dual agency view of board compensation: The joint effects of outside director and CEO stock options on firm risk. Strategic Management J. 32(2):212–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dezső CL, Ross DG, Uribe J (2016) Is there an implicit quota on women in top management? A large‐sample statistical analysis. Strategic Management J. 37(1):98–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisfeldt AL, Kuhnen CM (2013) CEO turnover in a competitive assignment framework. J. Financial Econom. 109(2):351–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• England GW (1967) Personal value systems of American managers. Acad. Management J. 10(1):53–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feist GJ (1998) A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 2(4):290–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Boyd BK (1998) How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 41(2):179–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1990) Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):484–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbach A, Woolley K (2022) The structure of intrinsic motivation. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 9(1):339–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun CJ, Ginsberg A (1990) Shifting gears: Enabling change in corporate aggressiveness. Strategic Management J. 11(4):297–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forsgren R (1990) Psychological types of casual inventors. J. Psych. Type 20:61–64.Google Scholar
• Frank KA (2000) Impact of a confounding variable on a regression coefficient. Sociol. Methods Res. 29(2):147–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank KA, Maroulis SJ, Duong MQ, Kelcey BM (2013) What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin’s causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Ed. Evaluation Policy Anal. 35(4):437–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fromer JC (2010) A psychology of intellectual property. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 104(4):1441–1508.Google Scholar
• Frosch K, Harhoff D, Hoisl K, Steinle C, Zwick T (2015) Individual determinants of inventor productivity: Report and preliminary results with evidence from linked human capital and patent data. ZEW Discussion Paper 15–001, Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
• Gallus J, Frey BS (2016) Awards: A strategic management perspective. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1699–1714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garg VK, Walters BA, Priem RL (2003) Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance. Strategic Management J. 24(8):725–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gay C, Latham W, Le Bas C (2008) Collective knowledge, prolific inventors and the value of inventions: An empirical study of French, German and British patents in the US, 1975–1999. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 17(1–2):5–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Ariely D (2012) The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(3):445–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ginsberg A (1988) Measuring and modelling changes in strategy: Theoretical foundations and empirical directions. Strategic Management J. 9(6):559–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giuri P, Mariani M, Brusoni S, Crespi G, Francoz D, Gambardella A, Gracia-Fontes W, et al. (2007) Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Res. Policy 36(8):1107–1127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (2016) Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases, 9th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Berry JW (2011) The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Acad. Management J. 54(1):73–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2002) Sticky aspirations: Organizational time perspective and competitiveness. Organ. Sci. 13(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Guilford JP (1967) The Nature of Human Intelligence (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Briscoe F, Hambrick DC (2018) Evenhandedness in resource allocation: Its relationship with CEO ideology, organizational discretion, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1848–1868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Fung A, Murphy C (2021) Out of character: CEO political ideology, peer influence, and adoption of CSR executive position by Fortune 500 firms. Strategic Management J. 42(3):529–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1993) Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Acad. Management J. 36(4):844–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris D, Helfat C (1997) Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management J. 18(11):895–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Boivie S, Stern I, Porac J (2024) Inventor CEO involvement and firm exploitative and exploratory innovation. Strategic Management J. 45(11):2227–2256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haynes KT, Hillman A (2010) The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management J. 31(11):1145–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf M, Singh H, Teece D, Winter SG (2009) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Henderson SJ (2004) Inventors: The ordinary genius next door. Sternberg RJ, Grigorienko EL, Singer JL, eds. Creativity: From Potential to Realization (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 103–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Miller D, Hambrick DC (2006) How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management J. 27(5):447–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho SS, Li AY, Tam K, Zhang F (2015) CEO gender, ethical leadership, and accounting conservatism. J. Bus. Ethics 127(2):351–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoechle D (2007) Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata J. 7(3):281–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Islam E, Zein J (2020) Inventor CEOs. J. Financial Econom. 135(2):505–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost JT, Nosek BA, Gosling SD (2008) Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 3(2):126–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, Sulloway FJ (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psych. Bull. 129(3):339–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost JT, Napier JL, Thorisdottir H, Gosling SD, Palfai TP, Ostafin B (2007) Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(7):989–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser U, Kongsted HC, Rønde T (2015) Does the mobility of R&D labor increase innovation? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 110:91–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karaevli A, Zajac EJ (2013) When do outsider CEOs generate strategic change? The enabling role of corporate stability. J. Management Stud. 50(7):1267–1294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kashmiri S, Mahajan V (2017) Values that shape marketing decisions: Influence of chief executive officers’ political ideologies on innovation propensity, shareholder value, and risk. J. Marketing Res. 54(2):260–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keats BW, Hitt MA (1988) A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad. Management J. 31(3):570–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly D, Amburgey TL (1991) Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Acad. Management J. 34(3):591–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Ployhart RE (2018) The strategic value of selection practices: Antecedents and consequences of firm-level selection practice usage. Acad. Management J. 61(1):46–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Zajac EJ (2001) How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. 12(5):632–657.Link, Google Scholar
• Krause R, Semadeni M, Cannella AA Jr (2014) CEO duality: A review and research agenda. J. Management 40(1):256–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW, Webster DM (1996) Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing. Psych. Rev. 103(2):263–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrañeta B, Zahra SA, Galán González JL (2014) Strategic repertoire variety and new venture growth: The moderating effects of origin and industry dynamism. Strategic Management J. 35(5):761–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le S, Kroll M (2017) CEO international experience: Effects on strategic change and firm performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 48(5):573–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Hwang BH, Chen H (2017) Are founder CEOs more overconfident than professional CEOs? Evidence from S&P 1500 companies. Strategic Management J. 38(3):751–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Shi W, Connelly BL, Yi X, Qin X (2022) CEO awards and financial misconduct. J. Management 48(2):380–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld-Toal UV, Ruenzi S (2014) CEO ownership, stock market performance, and managerial discretion. J. Finance 69(3):1013–1050.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Patel P, Oghazi P (2021) The value of managerial ability and general ability for inventor CEOs. J. Bus. Res. 135:78–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu D, Jiang K, Shalley CE, Keem S, Zhou J (2016) Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 137:236–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKay RB, Chia R (2013) Choice, chance, and unintended consequences in strategic change: A process understanding of the rise and fall of NorthCo Automotive. Acad. Management J. 56(1):208–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClelland PL, Liang X, Barker VL III (2010) CEO commitment to the status quo: Replication and extension using content analysis. J. Management 36(5):1251–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrae RR (1987) Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(6):1258–1265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mednick SA (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psych. Rev. 69(3):220–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merrifield B (1979) Stimulating technological innovation: Nurturing the inventor. Res. Management 22(6):12–14.Google Scholar
• Mieg HA (2011) Focused cognition: Information integration and complex problem solving by top inventors. Mosier KL, Fischer UM, eds. Informed by Knowledge: Expert Performance in Complex Situations (Psychology Press, New York), 41–54.Google Scholar
• Müller-Wienbergen F, Müller O, Seidel S, Becker J (2011) Leaving the beaten tracks in creative work—A design theory for systems that support convergent and divergent thinking. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 12(11):714–740.Google Scholar
• Musteen M, Barker VL III, Baeten VL (2006) CEO attributes associated with attitude toward change: The direct and moderating effects of CEO tenure. J. Bus. Res. 59(5):604–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Chen J (2014) Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1810–1833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oreg S, Vakola M, Armenakis A (2011) Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 47(4):461–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owan H, Nagaoka S (2011) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for inventors. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 11-E-022, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
• Pathak S, Hoskisson RE, Johnson RA (2014) Settling up in CEO compensation: The impact of divestiture intensity and contextual factors in refocusing firms. Strategic Management J. 35(8):1124–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahko J (2017) Knowledge spillovers through inventor mobility: The effect on firm-level patenting. J. Tech. Transfer 42(3):585–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan N, Spreitzer GM (1997) Toward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Acad. Management Rev. 22(1):48–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rossman J (1931) The motives of inventors. Quart. J. Econom. 45(3):522–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Runco MA (2010) Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. Kaufman JC, Sternberg RJ, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 413–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Runco MA, Acar S (2012) Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Res. J. 24(1):66–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Semadeni M, Chin MK, Krause R (2022) Pumping the brakes: Examining the impact of CEO political ideology divergence on firm responses. Acad. Management J. 65(2):516–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serfling MA (2014) CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. J. Corporate Finance 25:251–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaikh IA, O’Brien JP, Peters L (2018) Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms. J. Bus. Res. 82:192–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Connelly BL, Hoskisson RE (2017) External corporate governance and financial fraud: Cognitive evaluation theory insights on agency theory prescriptions. Strategic Management J. 38(6):1268–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith KG, Grimm CM (1987) Environmental variation, strategic change and firm performance: A study of railroad deregulation. Strategic Management J. 8(4):363–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart WH Jr, Watson WE, Carland JC, Carland JW (1999) A proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. J. Bus. Venturing 14(2):189–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swigart KL, Anantharaman A, Williamson JA, Grandey AA (2020) Working while liberal/conservative: A review of political ideology in organizations. J. Management 46(6):1063–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (2000) Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder? Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(2):293–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triana M, Miller TL, Trzebiatowski TM (2014) The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organ. Sci. 25(2):609–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Triana M, Richard OC, Su W (2019) Gender diversity in senior management, strategic change, and firm performance: Examining the mediating nature of strategic change in high tech firms. Res. Policy 48(7):1681–1693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Rosenkopf L (1996) Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the US cement industry. Management Sci. 42(7):939–953.Link, Google Scholar
• Udayasankar K (2008) Corporate social responsibility and firm size. J. Bus. Ethics 83(2):167–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ (1997) Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 29:271–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venus M, Stam D, van Knippenberg D (2019) Visions of change as visions of continuity. Acad. Management J. 62(3):667–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L, Jiang W (2017) How CEO underpayment influences strategic change: The equity perspective. Management Decision 55(10):2277–2292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang P, Wijnants ML, Ritter SM (2018) What enables novel thoughts? The temporal structure of associations and its relationship to divergent thinking. Frontiers Psych. 9:1771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Bednar MK (2005) Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms’ strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):262–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1992) Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. 35(1):91–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1993) Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment. Strategic Management J. 14(7):485–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolf KM, Mieg HA (2010) Cognitive determinants of the success of inventors: Complex problem solving and deliberate use of divergent and convergent thinking. Eur. J. Cognitive Psych. 22(3):443–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 18(2):293–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wowak AJ, Mannor MJ, Arrfelt M, McNamara G (2016) Earthquake or glacier? How CEO charisma manifests in firm strategy over time. Strategic Management J. 37(3):586–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Kraatz MS (1993) A diametric forces model of strategic change: Assessing the antecedents and consequences of restructuring in the higher education industry. Strategic Management J. 14(S1):83–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Shortell SM (1989) Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction, and performance implications. Strategic Management J. 10(5):413–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Bartol KM (2010) Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad. Management J. 53(1):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Rajagopalan N (2010) Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 31(3):334–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Shalley CE (2010) Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. Zedeck S, ed. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 1 (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 275–302.Google Scholar
• Zwick T, Frosch K, Hoisl K, Harhoff D (2017) The power of individual-level drivers of inventive performance. Res. Policy 46(1):121–137.Crossref, Google Scholar