Theorizing as Problem Solving: A Pragmatist Perspective on the Logic of Pursuit

References

• Achinstein P (1993) How to defend a theory without testing it: Niels Bohr and the “logic of pursuit”. Midwest Stud. Philos. 18(1):90–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agassi J (1979) The legacy of Lakatos. Philos. Soc. Sci. 9(3):316–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Solarino AM (2019) Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1291–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (2020) Sins of omission and the practice of economics. J. Econom. Literature 58(2):405–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Shiller RJ (2010) Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Allison GT (1971) The Essence of Decision (Little, Brown, and Company, Boston).Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Sandberg J (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):247–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ananth P, Baer M, Deichmann D (2024) Developing problem representations in organizations: A synthesis across literatures and an integrative framework. J. Management, ePub ahead of print November 12, https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241291532.Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Schmittlein DC (1984) Integration of the sales force: An empirical examination. RAND J. Econom. 15(3):385–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anonymous (2015) The case of the hypothesis that never was; uncovering the deceptive use of post hoc hypotheses. J. Management Inquiry 24(2):214–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archibald GC, Simon HA, Samuelson PA (1963) Discussion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 53(2):227–236.Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Bercovitz J (2015) Franchisee associations as sources of bargaining power? Some evidence. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(4):811–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Zenger TR (2012) Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1643–1657.Link, Google Scholar
• Asimov I (1984) Asimov’s New Guide to Science (Penguin Books, London).Google Scholar
• Backhouse RE (1994) The fixation of economic beliefs. J. Econom. Methodology 1(1):33–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Dirks KT, Nickerson JA (2013) Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):197–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balachandran S, Hernandez E (2019) Do institutional reforms perpetuate or mitigate the Matthew effect? Intellectual property rights and access to international alliances. Strategy Sci. 4(2):151–174.Link, Google Scholar
• Bamberger PA (2019) On the replicability of abductive research in management and organizations: Internal replication and its alternatives. Acad. Management Discoveries 5(2):103–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banks GC, O’Boyle EH, Pollack JM, White CD, Batchelor JH, Whelpley CE, Adkins CL (2016) Questions about questionable research practices in the field of management. J. Management 42(1):5–20.Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Smith WK, Vaara E (2018) New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1189–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnes B (1977) Interests and the Growth of Knowledge (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Baum G, Smith G (2015) Great companies: Looking for success secrets in all the wrong places. J. Investing 24(3):61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bedeian AG, Taylor SG, Miller AN (2010) Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 9(4):715–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behfar K, Okhuysen GA (2018) Discovery within validation logic: Deliberately surfacing, complementing, and substituting abductive reasoning in hypothetico-deductive inquiry. Organ. Sci. 29(2):323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry H, Kaul A, Lee N (2021) Follow the smoke: The pollution haven effect on global sourcing. Strategic Management J. 42(13):2420–2450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis RA (2012) The search for asterisks: Compromised statistical tests and flawed theories. Strategic Management J. 33(1):108–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis RA, Blettner D (2020) Strategic reality today: Extraordinary past success, but difficult challenges loom. Strategic Management Rev. 1(1):75–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A (2024) Rules won’t stop research misconduct in social science. Times Higher Ed. (January 19), https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/rules-wont-stop-research-misconduct-social-science.Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A (2025a) The art of persuasion: Theorizing as argumentation. Strategic Organ., ePub ahead of print January 17, https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270251316028.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A (2025b) Science as a vocation redux: Outsourcing the logic of discovery to AI. AI Soc., ePub ahead of print April 17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02328-4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A, Akkermans H (2024) The confidence trap in operations management practices: Anatomy of man-made disasters. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(4):1245–1268.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A, Ketokivi M (2021) Bilateral dependency and supplier performance ambiguity in supply chain contracting: Evidence from the railroad industry. J. Oper. Management 67(1):49–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A, Sergeeva A (2023) Values‐based trust as a shift parameter for collective organizing: The case of Magnum Photos. J. Management Stud. 60(8):2022–2059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A, Mahoney JT, Nickerson J (2025) Problem formulation for theorizing at the frontier: An Oliver Williamson inspired approach. Strategic Management Rev. 6(3):219–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blair R, Lafontaine F (2010) The Economics of Franchising (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Blaug M (1980) The Methodology of Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Boland LA (1979) A critique of Friedman’s critics. J. Econom. Literature 17(2):503–522.Google Scholar
• Burks AW (1946) Peirce’s theory of abduction. Philos. Sci. 13(4):301–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bylund PL, Packard MD (2022) Back to the future: Can counter-history accelerate theoretical advancement in management? Acad. Management Perspect. 36(2):801–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT (1974) Evolutionary epistemology. Schlipp PA, ed. The Philosophy of Karl Popper (The Library of Living Philosophers, LaSalle, IL), 413–463.Google Scholar
• Carmichael RD (1922) The logic of discovery. Monist 32(4):569–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Busenbark JR, Woo HS, Semadeni M (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2639–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Empire (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chomsky N, Roberts I, Watumull J (2023) Noam Chomsky: The false promise of ChatGPT. New York Times (March 8), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noam-chomsky-chatgpt-ai.html.Google Scholar
• Churchland PM (1985) The ontological status of observables: In praise of the super-empirical virtues. Churchland PM, Hooker CA, eds. Images of Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 35–47.Google Scholar
• Coad A (2021) Econometrics and the growth of firms: Perspectives from evolutionary economics. Strategy Sci. 6(4):338–352.Link, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1965) Evaluation of public policy relating to radio and television broadcasting: Social and economic issues. Land Econom. 41(2):161–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1988) The nature of the firm: Origin. J. Law Econom. Organ. 4(1):3–17.Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Stouten J, Van Knippenberg D (2021) The theory crisis in management research: Solving the right problem. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):667–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cukier K, Mayer-Schönberger V, de Véricourt F (2022) Framers: Human Advantage in an Age of Technology and Turmoil (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Cummings T, Nickerson J (2024) A protocol mechanism for solving the “right” strategic problem. Strategic Management Rev. 5(3):273–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curd MV (1980) The logic of discovery: An analysis of three approaches. Nickles T, ed. Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 201–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David P, Dharwadkar R, Duru A (2022) Financial reporting choices, governance structures, and strategic assets: A transaction cost perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 47(4):579–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis MS (1971) That’s interesting!: Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philos. Soc. Sci. 1(2):309–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deichmann D, Moser C, Van den Ende J (2021) Talk, talk, talk: Exploring idea conversations and the micro-level foundations of knowledge sharing for innovation. Innovation Organ. Management 23(3):287–313.Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1988) Ownership, Control, and the Firm (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Denzin NK (1970) The Research Act (Aldine, London).Google Scholar
• Dew N (2007) Abduction: A pre-condition for the intelligent design of strategy. J. Bus. Strategy 28(4):38–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1938) Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (Henry Holt and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Diesing P (1971) Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences (Aldine, New York).Google Scholar
• Dorst K, Cross N (2001) Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Stud. 22(5):425–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drnevich PL, Mahoney JT, Schendel D (2020) Has strategic management research lost its way? Strategic Management Rev. 1(1):35–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duhem P (1906) The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1246–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (2021) What is the Eisenhardt method, really? Strategic Organ. 19(1):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME, Sonenshein S (2016) Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1113–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evered R, Louis MR (1981) Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside.” Acad. Management Rev. 6(3):385–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M, Fiss PC (2022) Thriving on contradiction: Toward a dialectical alternative to fit‐based models in strategy (and beyond). Strategic Management J. 43(2):340–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feyerabend PK (1975) Against Method (Verso, London).Google Scholar
• Fisher CM, Pillemer J, Amabile TM (2018) Deep help in complex project work: Guiding and path-clearing across difficult terrain. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1524–1553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ (1996) Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organ. Sci. 7(5):470–476.Link, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Hallberg NL (2014) How symmetrical assumptions advance strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 35(6):903–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Hallberg NL (2017) Changing assumptions and progressive change in theories of strategic organization. Strategic Organ. 15(3):410–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Klein PG (2023) Why do companies go woke? Acad. Management Perspect. 37(4):351–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Weber L (2016) Moving opportunism to the back seat: Bounded rationality, costly conflict, and hierarchical forms. Acad. Management Rev. 41(1):61–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Frederiksen L, Rullani F (2016) Problem-formulation and problem-solving in self-organized communities: How modes of communication shape project behaviors in the free open-source software community. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2589–2610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Klein PG, McCaffrey M (2019) Austrian Perspectives on Entrepreneurship, Strategy, and Organization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frankfurt H (2005) On Bullshit (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1953) The methodology of positive economics. Friedman M, ed. Essays in Positive Economics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 3–43.Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (2002) Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Bus. Hist. Rev. 76(1):37–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T (1993) How We Know What Isn’t So (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Glaser BG (2001) The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC, Hill CW (1995) The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 16(7):519–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goertz G, Mahoney J (2012) A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graebner ME, Knott AM, Lieberman MB, Mitchell W (2023) Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question‐driven, phenomenon‐based approach to strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 44(1):3–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunitsky S (2019) Rival visions of parsimony. Internat. Stud. Quart. 63(3):707–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hacking I (1983) Representing and Intervening (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hacking I (2016) Logic of Statistical Inference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haley UC (2023) Triviality and the search for scholarly impact. Organ. Stud. 44(9):1547–1550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (2007) The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Acad. Management J. 50(6):1346–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanson NR (1958) Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Hanson NR (1960) Is there a logic of scientific discovery? Australasian J. Philos. 38(2):91–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman DM (1992) Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Singer B (2017) Abducting economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):298–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hempel CG (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ (2000) The institutional environment for multinational investment. J. Law Econom. Organ. 16(2):334–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennart JF (1982) A Theory of Multinational Enterprise (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
• Hicks MT, Humphries J, Slater J (2024) ChatGPT is bullshit. Ethics Inform. Tech. 26(2):38–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh C, Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2007) Opportunity discovery, problem solving and a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. J. Management Stud. 44(7):1255–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hume D (2006) An Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (Cosimo, New York).Google Scholar
• Hurwicz L (1973) The design of mechanisms for resource allocation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 63(May):1–30.Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Winter SG (2005) The co‐evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26(5):395–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James W (1907) Pragmatism (Anodos Books, Whithorn, UK).Google Scholar
• Jevons WS (1879) The Theory of Political Economy (Augustus M. Kelley, New York).Google Scholar
• Kaplan A (1964) The Conduct of Inquiry (Chandler Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Kerlinger FN (1964) Foundations of Behavioral Research (Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York).Google Scholar
• Kerr NL (1998) HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 2(3):196–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, Mahoney JT (2016) Transaction cost economics as a constructive stakeholder theory. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 15(1):123–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, Mantere S (2010) Two strategies for inductive reasoning in organizational research. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):315–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, Mantere S (2021) What warrants our claims? A methodological evaluation of argument structure. J. Oper. Management 67(6):755–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, Fosse SM, Kawalek P (2025) The ethical embeddedness of the economic inequality debate. J. Bus. Ethics 196(3):565–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Goldfarb B, Simcoe T (2021) Learning from testimony on quantitative research in management. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klag M, Langley A (2013) Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. Internat. J. Management Rev. 15(2):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight FH (1951) The role of principles in economics and politics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 41(1):1–29.Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (2022) The Last Writings of Thomas S. Kuhn: Incommensurability in Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ladd GW (1987) Imagination in Research: An Economist’s View (Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA).Google Scholar
• Lakatos I (1970) The methodology of scientific research programmes. Lakatos I, Musgrave A, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 91–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakatos I (1980) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Lam SY (2010) What kind of assumptions need to be realistic and how to test them: A response to Tsang (2006). Strategic Management J. 31(6):679–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laudan L (1978) Progress and Its Problems (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Laudan L (1981a) A problem-solving approach to scientific progress. Hacking I, ed. Scientific Revolutions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 144–155.Google Scholar
• Laudan L (1981b) Science and Hypothesis (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laudan R (1987) The rationality of entertainment and pursuit. Pitt JC, Pera M eds. Rational Changes in Science (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 203–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laudan L (1990) Demystifying underdetermination. Scientific Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 14 (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN), 267–297.Google Scholar
• Leamer EE (1983) Let’s take the con out of econometrics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 73(1):31–43.Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Reuer JJ, Zenger T (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategy Sci. 3(4):558–573.Link, Google Scholar
• Levi I (1991) The Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing: Changing Beliefs Through Inquiry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipton P (2004) Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd revised ed. (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Locke K, Golden-Biddle K, Feldman MS (2008) Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organ. Sci. 19(6):907–918.Link, Google Scholar
• Longino HE (2018) The Fate of Knowledge (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu X, Lee H, Coles R (2023) Move fast and break things? The contingent nature of product acceleration in nascent markets. Strategy Sci. 8(4):484–507.Link, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Richman BD (2008) Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics 10(1):1–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machlup F (1963) Essays on Economic Semantics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Mackonis A (2013) Inference to the best explanation, coherence, and other explanatory virtues. Synthese 190(6):975–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magnani I (2001) Abduction, Reason, and Science: Processes of Discovery and Explanation (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT (1993) Strategic management and determinism: Sustaining the conversation. J. Management Stud. 30(1):173–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, Nickerson JA (2022) Oliver Williamson: A hero’s journey on the merits. J. Institutional Econom. 18(2):195–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, Sanchez R (2004) Building new management theory by integrating processes and products of thought. J. Management Inquiry 13(1):34–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makadok R, Burton R, Barney J (2018) A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1530–1545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mäki U (2000) Kinds of assumptions and their truth: Shaking an untwisted F-twist. Kyklos 53(3):317–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantere S, Ketokivi M (2013) Reasoning in organization science. Acad. Management Rev. 38(1):70–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marschak J, Radner R (1972) Economic Theory of Teams (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Marshall A (1920) Principles of Economics (Macmillan and Company, London).Google Scholar
• Martins LL, Rindova VP, Greenbaum BE (2015) Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 9(1):99–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ (2009) Construct validity and other empirical issues in transaction cost economics research. Bergh DD, Ketchen DJ, eds. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, vol. 5 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 213–236.Google Scholar
• McCloskey D (1985) The Rhetoric of Economics (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI).Google Scholar
• McGahan AM (2007) Academic research that matters to managers: On zebras, dogs, lemmings, hammers, and turnips. Acad. Management J. 50(4):748–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meehl PE (1990) Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psych. Inquiry 1(2):108–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1938) Science and the social order. Philos. Sci. 5(3):321–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (2007) Paradigm prison, or in praise of atheoretic research. Strategic Organ. 5(2):177–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitroff II, Featheringham TR (1974) On systemic problem solving and the error of the third kind. Behavioral Sci. 19(6):383–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B, Balakrishnan S (1989) Strategy content and the research process: A critique and commentary. Strategic Management J. 10(2):189–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Musgrave A (1981) Unreal assumptions in economic theory: The F‐twist untwisted. Kyklos 34(3):377–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Musgrave A, Pigden C (2021) Irme Lakatos. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (April 26), https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lakatos/.Google Scholar
• Nagel E (1963) Assumptions in economic theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 53(2):211–219.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA (2010) Oliver Williamson and his impact on the field of strategic management. J. Retailing 86(3):270–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Argyres N (2018) Strategizing before strategic decision making. Strategy Sci. 3(4):592–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Wuebker R, Zenger T (2017) Problems, theories, and governing the crowd. Strategic Organ. 15(2):275–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Yen CJ, Mahoney JT (2012) Exploring the problem-finding and problem-solving approach for designing organizations. Acad. of Management Perspectives. 26(1):52–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niiniluoto I (2018) Truth-Seeking by Abduction (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nola R, Sankey H (2007) Theories of Scientific Method (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nuzzo R (2014) Scientific method: Statistical errors. Nature 506(7487):150–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Joseph J (2018) The attention-based view of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1):289–294.Link, Google Scholar
• Ohno T (1988) Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production (Productivity Press, London).Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE (1997) Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. J. Law Econom. Organ. 13(2):387–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park CH, Baer M (2022) Getting to the root of things: The role of epistemic motivation and construal levels in strategic problem formulation. Strategy Sci. 7(4):284–299.Link, Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1923) Chance, Love, and Logic (Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1929) Guessing. Hound Horn 2(April–June):267–282.Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1933) The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: The Simplest Mathematics, vol. 4, Hartshorne C, Weiss P, eds. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), 62.Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1934) The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Pragmatism and Pragmaticism, vol. 5, Hartshorne C, Weiss P, eds. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), 145, 374–376.Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1958) The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Pragmatism and Pragmaticism, vol. 7, Burks AW, ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), 218.Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1967) Note on the theory of the economy of research. Oper. Res. 15(4):643–648.Link, Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1997) Pragmatism as a Principle and Method of Right Thinking: The 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism. Turrisi PA, ed. (State University of New York Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1993) Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Management Rev. 18(4):599–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfleiderer P (2020) Chameleons: The misuse of theoretical models in finance and economics. Economica 87(345):81–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popper KR (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Hutchinson and Company, London).Google Scholar
• Popper KR (1962) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Popper KR (1983) Realism and the Aim of Science. Bartley WW III, ed. (Hutchinson, London).Google Scholar
• Popper KR (1994) The Myth of the Framework (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Popper KR (1999) All Life is Problem Solving (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Popper KR (2002) Darwinism as a metaphysical research programme. Balashov Y, Rosenberg A, eds. Philosophy of Science (Routledge, London), 302–304.Google Scholar
• Powell TC (2001) Competitive advantage: Logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic Management J. 22(9):875–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK, Bettis RA (1986) The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management J. 7(6):485–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt MG (2009) From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Acad. Management J. 52(5):856–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Kaplan S, Whittington R (2020) The tumult over transparency: Decoupling transparency from replication in establishing trustworthy qualitative research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam H (2002) Pragmatism and non-scientific knowledge. Conant J, Zeglen UM, eds. Hilary Putnam (Routledge, London), 14–24.Google Scholar
• Quine WVO (1953) From a Logical Point of View (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Reichenbach H (1938) Experience and Prediction. An Analysis of the Foundation and Structure of Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Rescher N (1978) Peirce’s Philosophy of Science (University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend, IN).Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2018) From values to value: Value rationality and the creation of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1):323–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2021) Shaping possibilities: A design science approach to developing novel strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):800–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rorty R (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Rorty R (2021) Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sætre AS, Van de Ven AH (2021) Generating theory by abduction. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):684–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2005) Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organ. Sci. 16(5):491–508.Link, Google Scholar
• Sappington DEM (1991) Incentives in principal-agent relationships. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(2):45–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheel AM, Tiokhin L, Isager PM, Lakens D (2021) Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 16(4):744–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheffler I (2011) Four Pragmatists: A Critical Introduction to Peirce, James, Mead, and Dewey (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Schulze A, Brusoni S (2022) How dynamic capabilities change ordinary capabilities: Reconnecting control and problem-solving. Strategic Management J. 43(12):2447–2477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sebeok T, Umiker-Sebeok J (1981) “You know my method”: A juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes. Eco U, Sebeok T, eds. The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN), 11–51.Google Scholar
• Sergeeva A, Bhardwaj A, Dimov D (2021) In the heat of the game: Analogical abduction in a pragmatist account of entrepreneurial reasoning. J. Bus. Venturing 36(6):106158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sergeeva A, Bhardwaj A, Dimov D (2022) Mutable reality and unknowable future: Revealing the broader potential of pragmatism. Acad. Management Rev. 47(4):692–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2021) Evolution of quantitative research methods in strategic management. Duhaime I, Hitt MA, Lyles M, eds. Strategic Management: State of the Field and Its Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 83–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw J (2022) On the very idea of pursuitworthiness. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 91(February):103–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheather S (2009) A Modern Approach to Regression with R (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shelanski HA, Klein PG (1995) Empirical research in transaction cost economics: A review and assessment. J. Law Econom. Organ. 11(2):335–361.Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA, Sutcliffe KM (2011) Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):361–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman BS (1999) Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Sci. 45(8):1109–1124.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1957) Models of Man: Social and Rational (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1963) Problems of methodology. Amer. Econom. Rev. 53(May):229–231.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1973) The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence 4(3):181–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Smith G (2020) The paradox of big data. SN Appl. Sci. 2(6):1041–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stacey RD (2007) Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics (Prentice-Hall, New York).Google Scholar
• Studenmund A (2017) Using Econometrics (Pearson Education Limited, Essex, UK).Google Scholar
• Swedberg R (1990) Economics and Sociology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tavory I, Timmermans S (2014) Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1982) Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(1):39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thagard P (1993) Societies of minds: Science as distributed computing. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 24(1):49–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Timmermans S, Tavory I (2012) Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociol. Theory 30(3):167–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toader AF (2021) Processes of knowledge recombination in two-person teams: Resource pool and resource integration. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 30(4):566–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toulmin SE (2003) The Uses of Argument (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tourish D, Craig R (2020) Research misconduct in business and management studies: Causes, consequences, and possible remedies. J. Management Inquiry 29(2):174–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang EW (2006) Behavioral assumptions and theory development: The case of transaction cost economics. Strategic Management J. 27(11):999–1011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang EW (2022) That’s interesting! A flawed article has influenced generations of management researchers. J. Management Inquiry 31(2):150–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dijk TA (2006) Ideology and discourse analysis. J. Political Ideologies 11(2):115–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veblen T (1908) The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts (Rutledge, London).Google Scholar
• Verbeke A, Kano L (2012) The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family–based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 36(6):1183–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkema RJ (1988) Problem complexity and the formulation process in planning and design. Behavioral Sci. 33(4):292–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E, Von Krogh G (2016) Identifying viable “need–solution pairs”: Problem solving without problem formulation. Organ. Sci. 27(1):207–221.Link, Google Scholar
• Walsh D (1979) Occam’s razor: A principle of intellectual elegance. Amer. Philos. Quart. 16(3):241–244.Google Scholar
• Walton D (2005) Abductive Reasoning (University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL).Google Scholar
• Ward B (1972) What’s Wrong with Economics? (Basic Books, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):516–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whetten DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):490–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wible JR (1994) Charles Sanders Peirce’s economy of research. J. Econom. Methodology 1(1):135–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1971) The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 61(2):112–123.Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1988) Corporate finance and corporate governance. J. Finance 43(3):567–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1996) The Mechanisms of Governance (The Free Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1999) Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. 20(12):1087–1108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE, Ouchi WG (1981) The markets and hierarchies’ program of research: Origins, implications, prospects. Van de Ven A, Joyce WF, eds. Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior (Wiley, New York), 347–370.Google Scholar
• Williamson OE, Wachter ML, Harris JE (1975) Understanding the employment relation: The analysis of idiosyncratic exchange. Bell J. Econom. 6(1):250–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood MS, Fisher G (2023) A collective-evolutionary alternative for appraising entrepreneurship theory. Strategic Organ. 21(2):416–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellweger TM, Zenger TR (2023) Entrepreneurs as scientists: A pragmatist approach to producing value out of uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 48(3):379–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziman J (1991) Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar