Inside-out and Outside-in Perspectives on Corporate Purpose

References

• Adler PS, Heckscher C (2018) Collaboration as an organization design for shared purpose. Ringel L, Hiller P, Zietsma C, eds. Toward Permeable Boundaries of Organizations? (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 81–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert S, Whetten DA (1985) Organizational identity. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 263–295.Google Scholar
• Almandoz J (2012) Arriving at the starting line: The impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1381–1406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almandoz J (2014) Founding teams as carriers of competing logics: When institutional forces predict banks’ risk exposure. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):442–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almandoz J, Lee Y, Ribera A (2018) Unleashing the power of purpose: 5 steps to transform your business. IESE Insight 37:44–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aristotle (2001) Nicomachean Ethics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1994) Changing the role of top management: Beyond strategy to purpose. Harvard Bus. Rev. 72(6):79–88.Google Scholar
• Bass BM, Avolio BJ (1993) Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Admin. Quart. 17(1):112–121.Google Scholar
• Berg JM, Dutton JE, Wrzesniewski A (2013) Job crafting and meaningful work. Dik BJ, Byrne ZS, Steger MF, eds. Purpose and Meaning in the Workplace (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 81–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharov M, Mitzinneck B (2023) The multiple facets of corporate purpose: An analytical typology. Strategy Sci. 8(2):233–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown K (2021) 5 global issues to watch in 2022. United Nations Foundation (blog), December 21, https://unfoundation.org/blog/post/5-global-issues-to-watch-in-2022/.Google Scholar
• Cardona P, Rey C (2006) Management by missions: How to make the mission a part of management. Problems Perspect. Management 4(1):164–174.Google Scholar
• Cardona P, Rey C (2022) Missions: For whom does the company exist? Management by Missions (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland), 69–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Rindova V, Ravasi D (2016) Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at Alessi. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):347–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denning S (2011) The Secret Language of Leadership: How Leaders Inspire Action Through Narrative (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal D, Li OZ, Tsang A, Yang YG (2014) Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. J. Accounting Public Policy 33(4):328–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R (2023) From the boardroom: Making purpose research relevant for practice. Strategy Sci. 8(2):149–158.Link, Google Scholar
• Eccles RG, Krzus MP, Rogers J, Serafeim G (2012) The need for sector‐specific materiality and sustainability reporting standards. J. Appl. Corp. Finance 24(2):65–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmans A (2021) Grow the Pie: How Great Companies Deliver Both Purpose and Profit―Updated and Revised (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Epstein MJ, Elkington J, Leonard HB (2018) Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social Environmental and Economic Impacts (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Stevens ML (1998) Commensuration as a social process. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24(1):313–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J (2016) Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(1):92–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fink L (2018) Larry Fink’s 2018 letter to CEOs: A sense of purpose. Seeking Alpha (January 16), https://seekingalpha.com/article/4137819-larry-finks-2018-letter-ceos-sense-purpose.Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2015) Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1469–1485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fontán C, Alloza Á, Rey C (2019) (Re)discovering organizational purpose. Rey C, Bastons M, Sotok P, eds. Purpose-Driven Organizations: Management Ideas for a Better World (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 107–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, De Colle S (2010) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1970) A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine (September 13), https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Prat A, Serafeim G (2019) Corporate purpose and financial performance. Organ. Sci. 30(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C (2023) The contingent relationship between purpose and profits. Strategy Sci. 8(2):256–269.Link, Google Scholar
• Garton E, Mankins MC (2015) Engaging your employees is good but don’t stop there. Harvard Bus. Rev. (December 9), https://hbr.org/2015/12/engaging-your-employees-is-good-but-don’t-stop-there.Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2008a) Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence performance and productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):48–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2008b) The significance of task significance: Job performance effects relational mechanisms and boundary conditions. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):108–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2012) Leading with meaning: Beneficiary contact prosocial impact and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Acad. Management J. 55(2):458–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Campbell EM, Chen G, Cottone K, Lapedis D, Lee K (2007) Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):53–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG, Williams TA, Zhao EY (2019) Anchors aweigh: The sources, variety, and challenges of mission drift. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):819–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Wohlgezogen F (2023) Can purpose foster stakeholder trust in corporations? Strategy Sci. 8(2):270–287.Link, Google Scholar
• Gümüsay AA, Smets M, Morris T (2020) “God at work”: Engaging central and incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity. Acad. Management J. 63(1):124–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):250–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (2021) Reimagining Capitalism in a World on Fire (Hachette Book Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Jackson J, Milani J, Bradford B (2018) Empirical legitimacy and normative compliance with the law. Farazmand A, ed. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1914-1.Google Scholar
• Joly H (2021) Creating a meaningful corporate purpose. Harvard Bus. Rev. (October 28), https://hbr.org/2021/10/creating-a-meaningful-corporate-purpose.Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2023) The promises and perils of corporate stakeholderism. Strategy Sci. 8(2):288–301.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelman HC (1958) Compliance identification and internalization three processes of attitude change. J. Conflict Resolution 2(1):51–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SY, Park H (2011) Corporate social responsibility as an organizational attractiveness for prospective public relations practitioners. J. Bus. Ethics 103(4):639–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Flores R (2015) Reinfusing Values in Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick’s Legacy for Organizational Studies (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Bansal P, Barbosa AM (2023) Seeing beyond the here and now: How corporate purpose combats corporate myopia. Strategy Sci. 8(2):302–310.Link, Google Scholar
• Lepisto DA (2015) Reason for being: Exploring the formation and members’ acceptance of organizational purpose in an athletic footwear and apparel company. PhD dissertation, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.Google Scholar
• Lepisto DA (2022) Ritual work and the formation of a shared sense of meaningfulness. Acad. Management J. 65(4):1327–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lepisto DA, Pratt MG (2017) Meaningful work as realization and justification: Toward a dual conceptualization. Organ. Psych. Rev. 7(2):99–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• L’Etang J (1994) Public relations and corporate social responsibility: Some issues arising. J. Bus. Ethics 13(2):111–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lleo A, Bastons M, Rey C, Ruiz-Perez F (2021) Purpose implementation: Conceptualization and measurement. Sustainability 13(4):Article 1921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackey J, Sisodia R (2014) Conscious Capitalism with a New Preface by the Authors: Liberating the Heroic Spirit of Business (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Mahoney J (2023) Corporate personhood and fiduciary duties as critical constructs in developing stakeholder management theory and corporate purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):212–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C (2020) Better Business: How the B Corp Movement Is Remaking Capitalism (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Almandoz J (2012) New resource bank: In pursuit of green. HBS Organizational Behavior Unit Case 412-060, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Toffel MW, Zhou Y (2016) Scrutiny norms and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organ. Sci. 27(2):483–504.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayer C (2018) Prosperity: Better Business Makes the Greater Good (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• McGahan A (2023) The new stakeholder theory on organizational purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):245–255.Link, Google Scholar
• McIntosh M, Coleman G, Jones KA, Leipziger D (1998) Corporate Citizenship (Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• McPhail C (1994) The dark side of purpose: Individual and collective violence in riots. Sociol. Quart. 35(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michaelson C, Pratt MG, Grant AM, Dunn CP (2014) Meaningful work: Connecting business ethics and organization studies. J. Bus. Ethics 121(1):77–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1983) The case for corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Strategy 4(2):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pérez-López JA (2018) Fundamentos de la dirección de empresas (Ediciones Rialp, Madrid).Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Khurana R, Hill-Popper M (2005) Revisiting the meaning of leadership. Res. Organ. Behav. 26:1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polman P, Winston AS (2022) Net Positive (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Pratt MG (1998) To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. Whetten DA, Godfrey PC, eds. Identity in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 171–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt MG (2000) The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):456–493.Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Ashforth BE (2003) Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. Cameron KS, Dutton JS, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco), 309–327.Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Hedden L (2023) Accounts and accountability: On organizational purpose, organizational identity, and meaningful work. Strategy Sci. 8(2):182–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Rey C, Velasco JSC, Almandoz J (2019) The new logic of purpose within the organization in purpose-driven organizations. Rey C, Bastons M, Sotok P, eds. Purpose-Driven Organizations: Management Ideas for a Better World (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 3–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Martins LL (2023) Moral imagination and shaping through strategic purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):170–181.Link, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. Amer. Psych. 55(1):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein EH (2010) Organizational Culture and Leadership, Vol. 2 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1984) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Shin D, Hasse VC, Schotter AP (2017) Multinational enterprises within cultural space and place: Integrating cultural distance and tightness–looseness. Acad. Management J. 60(3):904–921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinek S (2009) Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action (Penguin Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Telford T (2019) Volkswagen executives charged with market manipulation in emissions scandal. Washington Post (September 24), https://www.washingtonpost.com/business2019/09/24/top-volkswagen-executives-charged-with-market-manipulation-emissions-scandal.Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture Structure and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warriner CK (1965) The problem of organizational purpose. Sociol. Quart. 6(2):139–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M (2001) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Westphal J (2023) Systemic symbolic management, corporate social responsibility, and corporate purpose: A cautionary tale. Strategy Sci. 8(2):221–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Yan S, Almandoz J, Ferraro F (2021) The impact of logic (in)compatibility: Green investing, state policy and corporate environmental performance. Admin Sci. Quart. 66(4):903–944.Crossref, Google Scholar