Systemic Symbolic Management, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Purpose: A Cautionary Tale

References

• Aguilera RV, Aragón-Correa JA, Marano V, Tashman PA (2021) The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. J. Management 47(6):1468–1497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahn AM, Wiersema MF (2021) Activist hedge funds: Beware the new titans. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(1):96–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almandoz J(J) (2023) Inside-out and outside-in perspectives on corporate purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):139–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Arena C, Bozzolan S, Michelon G (2015) Environmental reporting: Transparency to stakeholders or stakeholder manipulation? An analysis of disclosure tone and the role of the board of directors. Corporate Soc. Responsibility Environ. Management 22(6):346–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Management J. 47(1):93–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Song HC (2017) Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):105–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Tallarita R (2022) The perils and questionable promise of ESG-based compensation. J. Corporate Law 48(1):37–75.Google Scholar
• Bilgili H, Johnson JL, Bilgili TV, Ellstrand AE (2021) Research on social relationships and processes governing the behaviors of members of the corporate elite: A review and bibliometric analysis. Rev. Management Sci. 3:1–55.Google Scholar
• Billio M, Costola M, Hristova I, Latino C, Pelizzon L (2021) Inside the ESG Ratings: (Dis) agreement and performance. Corporate Soc. Responsibility Environ. Management 28(5):1426–1445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boiral O, Brotherton MC, Talbot D (2020) Building trust in the fabric of sustainability ratings: An impression management perspective. J. Cleaner Production 260(1):120942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Bednar MK, Aguilera RV, Andrus JL (2016) Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):319–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Withers MC, Graffin SD, Corley KG (2021) Corporate directors’ implicit theories of the roles and duties of boards. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1662–1695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Celentano A, Lepore L, Pisano S, D’Amore G, Alvino F (2020) The joint effect of board independence and CSR committee on CSR disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Ownership Control 17(4):319–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho CH, Michelon G, Patten DM (2012) Impression management in sustainability reports: An empirical investigation of the use of graphs. Accounting Public Interest 12(1):16–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu JS, Davis GF (2016) Who killed the inner circle? The decline of the American corporate interlock network. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(3):714–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cordeiro JJ, Sarkis J (2008) Does explicit contracting effectively link CEO compensation to environmental performance? Bus. Strategy Environ. 17(5):304–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Hansen M, Zollo M (2016) The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Acad. Management J. 59(2):705–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Burbano VC (2011) The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Rev. 54(1):64–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derchi GB, Zoni L, Dossi A (2021) Corporate social responsibility performance, incentives, and learning effects. J. Bus. Ethics 173(3):617–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RE, Dmytriyev S (2017) Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory: Learning from each other. Symphonya 2:7–15.Google Scholar
• Gulati R (2022) Deep Purpose: The Heart and Soul of High-performance Companies (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Wohlgezogen F (2023) Can purpose foster stakeholder trust in corporations? Strategy Sci. 8(2):270–287.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahn T, Preuss L, Pinkse J, Figge F (2014) Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):463–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ikram M, Sroufe R, Mohsin M, Solangi YA, Shah SZA, Shahzad F (2019) Does CSR influence firm performance? A longitudinal study of SME sectors of Pakistan. J. Global Responsibility 11(1):27–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost JT, Kay AC, Thorisdottir H (2009) Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi P, Contractor N (2018) Better people analytics: Measure who they know, not just who they are. Harvard Bus. Rev. (November-December).Google Scholar
• Li ZF, Thibodeau C (2019) CSR-contingent executive compensation incentive and earnings management. Sustainability 11(12):3421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao CH, San Z, Tsan A, Yu L (2021) Board reforms around the world: The effect on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance 29(5):496–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lleo A, Bastons M, Rey C, Ruiz-Perez F (2021) Purpose implementation: Conceptualization and measurement. Sustainability 13(4):1921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Wang H, Raithel S, Zheng Q (2015) Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations, and firm future returns. Strategic Management J. 36:123–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maas K (2018) Do corporate social performance targets in executive compensation contribute to corporate social performance? J. Bus. Ethics 148:573–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maas K, Boons F (2017) CSR as a strategic activity: Value creation, redistribution and integration. Louche C, Idowu S, Filho W, eds. Innovative CSR (Routledge, London), 154–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Westphal JD (2011) My brother’s keeper? CEO identification with the corporate elite, social support among CEOs, and leader effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 54(4):661–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Westphal JD (2013) Access denied: Low mentoring of women and minority first-time directors and its negative effects on appointments to additional boards. Acad. Management J. 56(4):1169–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Keeves GD, Westphal JD (2018) One step forward, one step back: White male top manager organizational identification and helping behavior toward other executives following the appointment of a female or racial minority CEO. Acad. Management J. 61(2):405–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Monin B, Prentice DA (2000) Pluralistic ignorance and inconsistency between private attitudes and public behaviors. Terry DJ, Hogg MA, eds. Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Context (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 95–114.Google Scholar
• National Centre for Climate Restoration (2021) Climate reality check 2021 (November), https://www.climaterealitycheck.net/_files/ugd/148cb0_544aaa3eb24e450ca39c1f9ea5b0f6e7.pdf.Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K, Henisz WJ (2021) Webs of influence: Secondary stakeholder actions and cross-national corporate social performance. Organ. Sci. 32(1):233–255.Link, Google Scholar
• Radu C, Smaili N (2022) Alignment vs. monitoring: An examination of the effect of the CSR committee and CSR-linked executive compensation on CSR performance. J. Bus. Ethics 180:145–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2023) Moral imagination, the collective desirable, and strategic purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):170–181.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith J, Haniffa R, Fairbrass J (2011) A conceptual framework for investigating ‘capture’ in corporate sustainability reporting assurance. J. Bus. Ethics 99(3):425–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern I, Westphal JD (2010) Stealthy footsteps to the boardroom: Executives’ backgrounds, sophisticated interpersonal influence behavior, and board appointments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(2):278–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang A, Wang KT, Liu S, Yu L (2021) Integrating corporate social responsibility criteria into executive compensation and firm innovation: International evidence. J. Corporate Finance 70:102070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Byl CA, Slawinski N (2015) Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organ. Environ. 28(1):54–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veltrop DB, Bezemer PJ, Nicholson G, Pugliese A (2021) Too unsafe to monitor? How board–CEO cognitive conflict and chair leadership shape outside director monitoring. Acad. Management J. 64(1):207–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walls JL, Berrone P, Phan PH (2012) Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management J. 33:885–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD (1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Acad. Management J. 42(1):7–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD (2023) The institutionalization of symbolic action in corporate leadership. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Bednar MK (2005) Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms’ strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):262–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Graebner ME (2010) A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Acad. Management J. 53(1):15–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Park SH (2020) Symbolic Management: Governance, Strategy, and Institutions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1998) The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1):127–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (2013) A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):607–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zhu DH, Kunapuli R (2021) Seeking input when the train has left the station: The decoupling of participative strategic decision-making processes and the role of new technology in symbolic management. Strategic Organ. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270211046870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willis Towers Watson (2021) Executive Compensation Guidebook for Climate Transition. Willis Towers Watson and the Climate Governance Initiative (November 11), https://www.wtwco.com/en-US/Insights/2021/11/executive-compensation-guidebook-for-climate-transition.Google Scholar
• Wright C, Nyberg D (2017) An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1633–1661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan S, Almandoz J, Ferraro F (2021) The impact of logic (in)compatibility: Green investing, state policy, and corporate environmental performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):903–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Youyou W, Uzzi B (2020) Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(20):10762–10768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young S, Thyil V (2014) Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: The role of context in international settings. J. Bus. Ethics 122:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1994) The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large US corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management J. 15(S1):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu DH, Westphal JD (2011) Misperceiving the beliefs of others: How pluralistic ignorance contributes to the persistence of positive security analyst reactions to the adoption of stock repurchase plans. Organ. Sci. 22(4):869–886.Link, Google Scholar