Accounts and Accountability: On Organizational Purpose, Organizational Identity, and Meaningful Work
References
- (2000) Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):13–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (J) (2023) Inside-out and outside-in perspectives on corporate purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):139–148.Google Scholar
- (1968) The Functions of the Executive: Thirtieth Anniversary Edition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (1994) Changing the role of top management: Beyond strategy to purpose. Harvard Bus. Rev. 72(6):79–88.Google Scholar
- (1996) Life stories and the four need for meaning. Psych. Inquiry 7(4):322–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Habits of the Heart, With a New Preface: Individualism and Commitment in American Life (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
- (2019) Exploring work orientations and cultural accounts of work: Toward a research agenda for examining the role of culture in meaningful work. Yeoman R, Bailey C, Madden A, Thompson M, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Meaningful Work (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 185–207.Google Scholar
- (2006) Identity, intended image, construed image, and reputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 34(2):99–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Carreras E, Alloza A, Carreras A (2013) Corporate Reputation (LID Editorial Empresarial, Madrid).Google Scholar
- (2018) “I’m not mopping the floors, i’m putting a man on the moon”: How NASA leaders enhanced the meaningfulness of work by changing the meaning of work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):323–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1544–1570.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Corporate purpose needs democracy. J. Management Stud. 58(3):902–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Who cares about organizational purpose and corporate social responsibility, and how can organizations adapt? A hypermodern perspective. Bus. Horizons 63(4):585–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Help your employees find purpose–or watch them leave. Retrieved May 13, 2022, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/help-your-employees-find-purpose-or-watch-them-leave.Google Scholar
- (2021) Build your organizational identity | Retrieved May 13, 2022, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-organization-blog/build-your-organizational-identity.Google Scholar
- (1997) Merck & Co., INC: From core competence to global community involvement. Corporate Global Citizenship: Doing Business in the Public Eye (The New Lexington Press, San Francisco), 150–167.Google Scholar
- (1994) Judging others in the shadow of suspicion. Motivation Emotion 18(2):167–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) I don’t have a job. I have a higher calling. Wall Street Journal (February 24), https://www.wsj.com/articles/corporate-mission-statements-talk-of-higher-purpose-1424824784.Google Scholar
- (2020) Should corporations have a purpose? Symposium: Governance wars: Contesting power and purpose in the 21st century corporation. Texas Law Rev. 99(7):1309–1346.Google Scholar
- (2019) Struggling with meaningfulness when context shifts: Volunteer work in a German refugee shelter. J. Management Stud. 56(3):589–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) (Re)discovering organizational purpose. Rey C, Bastons M, Sotok P, eds. Purpose-Driven Organizations (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 107–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Man’s Search for Meaning (Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar
- (2019) Corporate purpose and financial performance. Organ. Sci. 30(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) The dark secrets behind big oil’s climate pledges. The Guardian (November 4), https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/04/dark-secrets-big-oil-climate-pledges-greenwashing.Google Scholar
- (2022) Cultivating deep purpose, not fake purpose. Retrieved May 13, 2022, https://www.shrm.org/executive/resources/articles/pages/deep-purpose-gulati.aspx.Google Scholar
- (2023) Can purpose foster stakeholder trust in corporations? Strategy Sci. 8(2):270–287.Google Scholar
- Hackman JR, Oldham, GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):250–279.Google Scholar
- (2016) Why Universities Must Choose One Telos: Truth or Social Justice (Heterodox Academy).Google Scholar
- (2021) Innovation in the 21st century: Architectural change, purpose, and the challenges of our time. Management Sci. 67(9):5479–5488.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Tackling climate change requires organizational purpose. AEA Paper Proc. 110:177–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Why do firms have “purpose”? The firm’s role as a carrier of identity and reputation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):326–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Organizations with purpose. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1227–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Purpose-driven leadership and organizational success: A case of higher educational institutions. Leadership Organ. Development J. 42(7):1004–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Sustaining meaningful work in a crisis: Adopting and conveying a situational purpose. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(3):806–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) A social-justice approach to organizational evaluation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23(2):272.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Why your mission and vision statements don’t work (and what to do about It). Forbes (April 13), https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeroenkraaijenbrink/2021/04/13/why-your-mission-and-vision-statements-dont-work-and-what-to-do-about-it/?sh=3cb04d0d34e2.Google Scholar
- (2023) Seeing beyond the here and now: How corporate purpose combats corporate myopia. Strategy Sci. 8(2):302–310.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) Leading our organizations on purpose: Leading our organizations on purpose. Leader Leadership 1998(9):10–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Reason for being: Exploring the formation and members’ acceptance of organizational purpose in an athletic footwear and apparel company. PhD dissertation, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2022) The purpose paradox. People Strategy J. 45(4):9–10.Google Scholar
- (2017) Meaningful work as realization and justification: Toward a dual conceptualization. Organ. Psych. Rev. 7(2):99–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):438–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) A model for organizational identity: Exploring the path to sustainability during change. Human Resources Development Rev. 1(3):277–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1977) Self-schemata and processing information about the self. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35(2):63–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The future of the corporation and the economics of purpose. J. Management Stud. 58(3):887–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
- McDonalds Corporation (2022) Our purpose & impact. Accessed May 13, 2022, https://corporate.mcdonalds.com/corpmcd/our-purpose-and-impact.html.Google Scholar
- Merck (ND) About us. Retrieved December 24, 2022, https://www.merck.com/company-overview/culture-and-values/.Google Scholar
- (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Why corporate purpose statements often miss their mark. Retrieved May 14, 2022, https://www.strategy-business.com/article/Why-corporate-purpose-statements-often-miss-their-mark.Google Scholar
- (2020) A world changed: What post-9/11 stories tell us about the position of america, purpose of business, and meaning of work. Acad. Management Rev. 45(4):877–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Understanding the purpose of benefit corporations: An empirical study on the Italian case. Internat. J Corporate Soc Responsibility 5(1):4.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1956) Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 1(1):63.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Kohler, San Francisco), 309–327.Google Scholar
- (2000) Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):18–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Harmonization of personal and organizational purpose. Rey C, Bastons M, Sotok P, eds. Purpose-Driven Organizations (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 17–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The new logic of purpose within the organization. Rey C, Bastons M, Sotok P, eds. Purpose-Driven Organizations (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 3–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Business purpose and the objective of the corporation. Pollman E, Thompson RB, eds. Research Handbook on Corporate Purpose and Personhood (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 27–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) HR Magazine: Employees disillusioned with company purpose. Retrieved May 13, 2022, https://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/articles/employees-disillusioned-with-company-purpose/.Google Scholar
- (2010) On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:91–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1968) Accounts. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 33(1):46–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):43–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Harper & Row Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
- Semin GR, Manstead ASR (1983) The Accountability of Conduct. A Social Psychological Analysis (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar
- (1993) The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organ. Sci. 4(4):577–594.Link, Google Scholar
- (1946) The proverbs of administration. Public Admin. Rev. 6(1):53–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1964) On the concept of organizational goal. Admin. Sci. Quart. 9(1):1.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Tracking the evolution of theoretical constructs in organizational scholarship: Examining cooperation and purpose. PhD dissertation, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2019) Patagonia’s focus on its brand purpose is great for business. Retrieved May 13, 2022, https://www.forbes.com/sites/veronikasonsev/2019/11/27/patagonias-focus-on-its-brand-purpose-is-great-for-business/.Google Scholar
- (2000) Identity theory and social identity theory. Soc. Psych. Quart. 63(3):224–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Corporate purpose: A social value judgement perspective. Strategy Sci. 8(2):202–211.Link, Google Scholar
- (1983) Accountability and complexity of thought. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(1):74–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:297–332.Google Scholar
- (2017) As Wal-Mart blitzes Internet retail, debate rages over company’s impact on US wages. Retrieved May 13, 2022, https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/20/wal-mart-still-front-and-center-of-debate-over-minimum-wages.html.Google Scholar
- (1994) Conceptualizing and assessing organizational image: Model images, commitment, and communication. Comm. Monograph 61(1):63–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Exploring the meaning of organizational purpose at a new dawn: The development of a conceptual model through expert interviews. Frontiers Psych. 12:675543.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1965) The problem of organizational purpose. Sociol. Quart. 6(2):139–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1930) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
- (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
- (2020) McDonalds’ mcplant burger and the evolution of the ‘purpose wash’ debate. Retrieved May 13, 2022, https://sustainablebrands.com/read/organizational-change/mcdonalds-mcplant-burger-and-the-evolution-of-the-purpose-wash-debate.Google Scholar
- Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE (2001) Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):179–201.Google Scholar

