Corporate Purpose in Comparative Perspective: The Role of Governance

References

• Aguilera RV, Jackson G (2003) The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):447–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Judge WQ, Terjesen SA (2018) Corporate governance deviance. Acad. Management Rev. 43(1):87–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy N, Gupta V, Mayfield MS, Trevor-Roberts E (2004) Future orientation. House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V, eds. Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA), 239–281.Google Scholar
• Bacq S, Aguilera RV (2022) Stakeholder governance for responsible innovation: A theory of value creation, appropriation, and distribution. J. Management Stud. 59(1):29–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Business Roundtable (2019) Business Roundtable redefines the purpose of a corporation to promote “an economy that serves all Americans.” (August 19), https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans.Google Scholar
• Chandler D (2021) Sustainable Value Creation (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Davis GF (2021) Corporate purpose needs democracy. J. Management Stud. 58(3):902–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deloitte (2022) Back to basics: Board education and evaluations. Board Practices Quarterly. Deloitte/Society for Corporate Governance, London/New York.Google Scholar
• Durand R (2023) What is the purpose? Tales of an academic in the boardroom. Strategy Sci. 8(2):149–158.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmans A (2021) Grow the Pie: How Great Companies Deliver Both Purpose and Profit—Updated and Revised (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• European Commission (2023) Corporate sustainability due diligence. Accessed December 15, 2022, https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/corporate-sustainability-due-diligence_en#why-does-the-eu-need-to-foster-sustainable-corporate-behaviour-and-responsible-corporate-governance.Google Scholar
• Gelfand MJ, Raver JL, Nishii L, Leslie LM, Lun J, Lim BC, Duan L, et al. (2011) Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science 332(6033):1100–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Haas MR, McGahan AM, Schillebeeckx SJ, Tracey P (2021) Purpose in the for-profit firm: A review and framework for management research. J. Management 49(6):1841–1869.Google Scholar
• Gordon JN, Ringe WG, eds. (2018) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Grennan J, Harvey CR, Rajgopal S (2022) Corporate culture: Evidence from the field. J. Financial Econom. 146(2):552–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin D, Guedhami O, Kwok CC, Li K, Shao L (2017) National culture: The missing country-level determinant of corporate governance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 48(6):740–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall PA, Soskice D, eds. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism—The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Zingales L (2022) The new corporate governance. NBER Working Paper No. 29975, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2012) What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(9):834–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A (2009) With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management J. 30(3):261–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, López-de-Silanes F, Shlleifer A (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. J. Finance 54(2):471–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT (2023) Corporate personhood and fiduciary duties as critical constructs in developing stakeholder management theory and corporate purpose. Strategy Sci., ePub ahead of print April 6, https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023. 0191.Link, Google Scholar
• Marano V, Sauerwald S, Van Essen M (2022) The influence of culture on the relationship between women directors and corporate social performance. J. Internat Bus. Stud. 53:1315–1342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C (2020) Better Business: How the B Corp Movement is Remaking Capitalism. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Mayer C (2020) It’s time to redefine the purpose of business. Here’s a roadmap. Accessed November 29, 2022, https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2020/sessions/the-future-of-the-corporation.Google Scholar
• Minkov M, Kaasa A (2022) Do dimensions of culture exist objectively? A validation of the revised Minkov-Hofstede model of culture with World Values Survey items and scores for 102 countries. J. Int. Management 28(4):100971Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Scherer AG, Voegtlin C (2020) Corporate governance for responsible innovation: Approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development. Acad. Management Perspect. 34(2):182–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serafeim G (2022) Purpose and Profit: How Business Can Lift Up the World (HarperCollins Leadership, New York).Google Scholar
• Shin S, Lee J, Bansal P (2022) From a shareholder to stakeholder orientation: Evidence from the analyses of CEO dismissal in large US firms. Strategic Management J. 43(7):1233–1257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spicer A, Dunfee TW, Bailey WJ (2004) Does national context matter in ethical decision making? An empirical test of integrative social contracts theory. Acad. Management J. 47(4):610–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stout L (2012) The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations, and the Public (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Suddaby R (2023) Corporate purpose: A social judgement perspective. Strategy Sci., ePub ahead of print April 6, https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0185.Google Scholar
• Surroca JA, Aguilera RV, Desender K, Tribó JA (2020) Is managerial entrenchment always bad and corporate social responsibility always good? A cross‐national examination of their combined influence on shareholder value. Strategic Management J. 41(5):891–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Surroca JA, Tribó JA, Zahra SA (2013) Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Acad. Management J. 56(2):549–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• The British Academy (2019) Principles for purposeful business. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/224/future-of-the-corporation-principles-purposeful-business.pdf.Google Scholar
• Tung RL, Stahl GK (2018) The tortuous evolution of the role of culture in IB research: What we know, what we don’t know, and where we are headed. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 49(9):1167–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD (2023) Systemic symbolic management, corporate social responsibility, and corporate purpose: A cautionary tale. Strategy Sci. 8(2):221–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Williams CA (2021) Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance. Gordon J, Ringe WG, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 634–678.Google Scholar