Strategy Theory Using Analogy: Rationale, Tools and Examples

References

• Bartha P (2015) Analogy in the natural sciences: Meeting Hesse’s challenge. Philos. Inquiries 3(1):47–68.Google Scholar
• Bartha P (2019) Analogy and analogical reasoning. Zalta EN, Nodelman U, eds. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall ed. (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford, CA), https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasoning-analogy/?fbclid=IwAR0PyC-AfpV1zqTv0GTa6ChoGilG_ZMkH34l3tLtsAH6bvOI-zojtFPh8uY.Google Scholar
• Blanchette I, Dunbar K (2000) How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory Cognition 28(1):108–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen A (2021) “Is your startup idea taken?”—And why we love X for Y startups. Accessed May 10, 2023, https://andrewchen.com/x-for-y-startup-ideas/.Google Scholar
• Chou A, Shu LH (2015) Using analogies to explain vs. inspire concepts. Artificial Intelligence Engrg. Design Anal. Manufacturing 29(2):135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clement CA, Gentner D (1991) Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Sci. 15(1):89–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drake JM, Kramer AM (2012) Mechanistic analogy: How microcosms explain nature. Theoret. Ecology 5:433–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drucker P (1994) The theory of the business. Harvard Bus. Rev. (September/October):95–106.Google Scholar
• Duit R, Treagust D (2003) Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. Internat. J. Sci. Ed. 25(6):671–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dul J (2016) Necessary condition analysis: Logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient” causality. Organ. Res. Methods 19(1):10–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dul J, Hak T, Goertz G, Voss C (2010) Necessary condition hypotheses in operations management. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 30(11):1170–1190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrig T, Schmidt J (2022) Theory‐based learning and experimentation: How strategists can systematically generate knowledge at the edge between the known and the unknown. Strategic Management J. 43(7):1287–1318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ezra A (2023) Analogy: Definition and examples—Explained simply. Accessed August 28, https://enlightio.com/analogy-definition-examples.Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger T (2009) Entrepreneurs as theorists: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 3(2):127–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger T (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Sci. 2(4):258–271.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2020) Open innovation: A theory-based view. Strategic Management Rev. 1(2):223–232.Google Scholar
• Franke N, Poetz MK, Schreier M (2014) Integrating problem solvers from analogous markets in new product ideation. Management Sci. 60(4):1063–1081.Link, Google Scholar
• Gary MS, Wood RE, Pillinger T (2012) Enhancing mental models, analogical transfer, and performance in strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. 33(11):1229–1246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Menon A (2016) Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight. Strategy Sci. 1(3):207–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Rivkin JW (2005) How strategists really think: Tapping the power of analogy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(4):54–63.Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gensler HJ (2010) An Introduction to Logic, 2nd ed. (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Gentner D (1982) Are scientific analogies metaphors? Miall DS, ed. Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives (Harvester Press, Sussex, UK), 106–132.Google Scholar
• Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Sci. 7(2):155–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D (2017) Analogy. Bechtel W, Graham G, eds. A Companion to Cognitive Science (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 107–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (2001) A Theory of Case-based Decisions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T (1981) Seeing the past in the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgments and decisions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 40(5):797–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodrich P (1986) Reading the Law: A Critical Introduction to Legal Method and Techniques (Blackwell, London).Google Scholar
• Green KC, Armstrong JS (2007) Structured analogies for forecasting. Internat. J. Forecasting 23(3):365–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haans RFJ, Rietveld J (2023) Is comparison the thief of joy? Antecedents and consequences of getting compared by information intermediaries. Presentation, Nagymaros Conference, May 22, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Harrison AG, Treagust DF (1993) Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade-10 optics. J. Res. Sci. Teaching 30(10):1291–1307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison AG, Treagust DF (1994) Science analogies. Sci. Teacher 61(4):40–43.Google Scholar
• Hesse MB (1966) Models and Analogies in Science (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).Google Scholar
• Hofstadter DR (2001) Analogy as the core of cognition. Gentner D, Holyoak KJ, Kokinov BN, eds. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 499–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstadter DR, Sander E (2013) Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking (Basic, New York).Google Scholar
• Holyoak KJ (2012) Analogy and relational reasoning. Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (Oxford University Press, New York), 234–259.Google Scholar
• Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1996) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1997) The analogical mind. Amer. Psychologist 52(1):35–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunter D (2001) Reason is too large: Analogy and precedent in law. Emory Law J. 50(4):1197–1265.Google Scholar
• Indurkhya B (1989) Modes of analogy. Jantke KP, ed. Internat. Workshop Analogical Inductive Inference (Springer, Berlin), 217–230.Google Scholar
• Lamm H, Trommsdorff G (1973) Group vs. individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 3(4):361–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamond G (2006) Precedent and analogy in legal reasoning. Zalta EN, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring ed. (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Martin R (2022) Exploiting analogy: The underdeveloped strategy skill. Medium (March 28), https://rogermartin.medium.com/exploiting-analogy-501e531f93ec.Google Scholar
• Nappo F (2021) Close encounters with scientific analogies of the third kind. Eur. J. Philos. Sci. 11(3):1–20.Google Scholar
• News Desk (2023) Google & OpenAI vs. fruit stands: A Walmart analogy. Accessed May 5, https://www.globalvillagespace.com/tech/google-openai-vs-fruit-stands-a-walmart-analogy/.Google Scholar
• Patel D, Ahmad A (2023) We have no moat and neither does OpenAI. Accessed May 5, https://www.semianalysis.com/p/google-we-have-no-moat-and-neither.Google Scholar
• Poetz M, Franke N, Schreier M (2014) Sometimes the best ideas come from outside your industry. Harvard Bus. Rev. (November 21), https://hbr.org/2014/11/sometimes-the-best-ideas-come-from-outside-your-industry.Google Scholar
• Posner RA (1990) The Problems of Jurisprudence (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ross BH, Kilbane MC (1997) Effects of principle explanation and superficial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 23(2):427–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP (2011) Good Strategy, Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP, Schendel D, Teece DJ (1991) Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management J. 12(S2):5–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandlin K (2016) Are you “Uber for this” or “ Match.com for that”? Use an analogy to describe your startup. Medium (June 5), https://medium.com/pitch-practice/are-you-uber-for-this-or-match-com-for-that-use-an-analogy-to-describe-your-startup-669512433860.Google Scholar
• Sankin A (2014) Every tech startup is like Uber but for (something). Daily Dot (August 7), https://www.dailydot.com/debug/its-like-uber-but-for/.Google Scholar
• Schauer F, Spellman BA (2017) Analogy, expertise, and experience. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 84(1):249–268.Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld AH, Herrmann DJ (1982) Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 8(5):484–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharkey A, Kovacs B, Hsu G (2022) Expert critics, rankings, and review aggregators: The changing nature of intermediation and the rise of markets with multiple intermediaries. Acad. Management Ann. 17(1):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Carroll GR (2021a) Making Great Strategy: Arguing for Organizational Advantage (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Carroll GR (2021b) Why good arguments make better strategy. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 62(4):47–53.Google Scholar
• Sunstein C (1993) On analogical reasoning. Harvard Law Rev. 106(3):741–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunstein CR (2017) Incompletely theorized agreements. Bellamy R, ed. The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers (Routledge, New York), 187–226.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger T (2016) Beyond Competitive Advantage: How to Solve the Puzzle of Sustaining Growth While Creating Value (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar