The Imagination Advantage: Why and How Strategists Combine Knowledge and Imagination in Developing Theories

References

• Agarwal R, Bacco F, Camuffo A, Coali A, Gambardella A, Msangi H, Sonka ST, et al. (2023) Does a theory-of-value add value? Evidence from a randomized control trial with Tanzanian entrepreneurs. Preprint, submitted April 20, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4412041.Google Scholar
• Alvarez SA, Porac J (2020) Imagination, indeterminacy, and managerial choice at the limit of knowledge. Acad. Management Rev. 45(4):735–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amer M, Daim TU, Jetter A (2013) A review of scenario planning. Futures 46:23–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andriani P, Cattani G (2024) Toward an evolutionary theory of shadow options: Emergent functions of Corning’s glass-based innovations. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print April 5, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17512.Link, Google Scholar
• Augustine G, Soderstrom S, Milner D, Weber K (2019) Constructing a distant future: Imaginaries in geoengineering. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1930–1960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badura C, Kind A (2021) Introduction: The epistemic role of imagination. Badura C, Kind A, eds. Epistemic Uses of Imagination (Routledge, New York), 1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr PS, Stimpert JL, Huff AS (1992) Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Obloj T, Pache AC, Sengul M (2022) Beyond shareholder value maximization: Accounting for financial/social trade-offs in dual-purpose companies. Acad. Management Rev. 47(2):237–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckert J (2016) Imagined Futures (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berglund H, Bousfiha M, Mansoori Y (2020) Opportunities as artifacts and entrepreneurship as design. Acad. Management Rev. 45(4):825–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bratman ME (1987) Intention, Plans and Practical Reasoning (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Cardon MS, Post C, Forster WR (2017) Team entrepreneurial passion: Its emergence and influence in new venture teams. Acad. Management Rev. 42(2):283–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Sands D, Porac J, Greenberg J (2018) Competitive sensemaking in value creation and capture. Strategy Sci. 3(4):632–657.Link, Google Scholar
• Conn C, McLean R (2020) Six problem-solving mindsets for very uncertain times. McKinsey Quart. 1–7.Google Scholar
• Cornelissen J, Höllerer MA, Seidl D (2021) What theory is and can be: Forms of theorizing in organizational scholarship. Organ. Theory 2:1–19.Google Scholar
• Corwin S, Vitale J, Kelly E, Cathles E (2015) The Future of Mobility: How Transportation Technology and Social Trends Are Creating a New Business Ecosystem (Deloitte University Press).Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrig T, Schmidt J (2022) Theory‐based learning and experimentation: How strategists can systematically generate knowledge at the edge between the known and the unknown. Strategic Management J. 43(7):1287–1318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fauchart E, Gruber M (2011) Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 54(5):935–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss N (2023) Microfoundations of ecosystems: The theory-led firm and capability growth. Strategic Organ. 21(2):476–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2009) Entrepreneurs as theorists: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 3(2):127–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Sci. 2(4):258–271.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Koenderink J, Krueger JI (2017) Rationality, perception, and the all-seeing eye. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 24:1040–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Gambardella A, Stern S, Zenger T (2019) Lean startup and the business model: Experimentation revisited. Long Range Planning 53(4):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I, Aguilera RV, Wright M (2020) From governance of innovation to innovations in governance. Acad. Management Perspect. 34(2):173–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr NR, Eisenhardt KM (2021) Strategy and uncertainty: Resource-based view, strategy-creation view, and the hybrid between them. J. Management 47(7):1915–1935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, McGahan AM (2010) Business-model innovation: General purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Long Range Planning 43(2–3):262–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Messinese D (2023) Theory-based and design-based approaches to strategic decisions. Working paper, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Heaton S, Novelli E, Teece DJ (2021) Profiting from enabling technologies? Strategy Sci. 6(1):75–90.Link, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Ryall MD (2017) Value capture theory: A strategic management review. Strategic Management J. 38(1):17–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner MK, Sternberg RJ (1994) Novelty and intelligence. Sternberg RJ, Wagner RK, eds. Mind in Context (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 38–73.Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Menon A (2016) Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight. Strategy Sci. 1(3):207–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Porac J (2018) On the origin of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1):352–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Rivkin JW (2007) On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organ. Sci. 18(3):420–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Helfat CE, Marengo L (2017) Searching, shaping, and the quest for superior performance. Strategy Sci. 2(3):194–209.Link, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG, Vogus TJ (2021) Inconceivable! Possibilistic thinking and the sociocognitive underpinnings of entrepreneurial responses to grand challenges. Organ. Theory 2:1–11.Google Scholar
• Gümüsay AA, Reinecke J (2022) Researching for desirable futures: From real utopias to imagining alternatives. J. Management Stud. 59(1):236–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (2021) What does firm shaping of markets really mean? Strategy Sci. 6(4):360–370.Link, Google Scholar
• Humberstone IL (1992) Direction of fit. Mind 101(401):59–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IKEA (2024a) Designing for a circular future. Accessed September 16, 2024, https://www.ikea.com/global/en/our-business/sustainability/designing-for-a-circular-future/.Google Scholar
• IKEA (2024b) Our circular agenda. Accessed September 16, 2024, https://www.ikea.com/global/en/our-business/sustainability/our-circular-agenda/.Google Scholar
• Kant I (1781/1996) Critique of Pure Reason, Unified Edition, translated by Werner S. Pluhar, 1996 (Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, IN).Google Scholar
• Kant I (1790/1987) Critique of Judgment, translated by Werner S. Pluhar, 1987 (Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, IN).Google Scholar
• Kind A, Kung P (2016) Introduction: The puzzle of imaginative use. Kind A, Kung P, eds. Knowledge Through Imagination (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Hart, Schaffner and Marx, New York).Google Scholar
• Lakatos I, Worrall J, Currie G, eds. (1978) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Philosophical Papers, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2011) A behavioral approach to strategy—What’s the alternative? Strategic Management J. 32(13):1517–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2017) Mendel in the C-Suite: Design and the evolution of strategies. Strategy Sci. 2(4):282–287.Link, Google Scholar
• Logue D, Grimes M (2022) Living up to the hype: How new ventures manage the resource and liability of future-oriented visions within the nascent market of impact investing. Acad. Management J. 65(3):1055–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martins LL, Rindova VP, Greenbaum B (2015) Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 9(1):99–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matherne S (2016) Kant’s theory of the imagination. Kind A, ed. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination (Routledge, London), 55–68.Google Scholar
• McClanahan A (2009) Future’s shock: Plausibility, preemption, and the fiction of 9/11. Symplokē 17(1–2):41–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster (2024) Definition of imagination. Accessed July 10, 2024, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imagination.Google Scholar
• Mische A (2014) Measuring futures in action: Projective grammars in the Rio + 20 debates. Theory Soc. 43(3):437–464.Google Scholar
• Mitchell R (2024) Broken chargers, lax oversight: How California’s troubled EV charging stations threaten emission goals. Los Angeles Times (January 24), https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-01-24/california-ev-charging-stations-broken.Google Scholar
• Myers J (2021) Reasoning with imagination. Badura C, Kind A, eds. Epistemic Uses of Imagination (Routledge, New York), 103–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan VK, Zane LJ, Kemmerer B (2011) The cognitive perspective in strategy: An integrative review. J. Management 37(1):305–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson J, Argyres N (2018) Strategizing before strategic decision making. Statist. Sci. 4(3):556–682.Google Scholar
• Nickerson J, Zenger T (2004) A knowledge-based theory of governance choice–A problem-solving approach. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Platts M (1979) Ways of Meaning (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Popper K (1972) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden‐Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26(4):397–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Business Rev. (November-December), https://hbr.org/1996/11/what-is-strategy.Google Scholar
• Raaheim K (1974) Problem Solving and Intelligence (Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, Norway).Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan N, Spreitzer GM (1997) Toward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Acad. Management Rev. 22(1):48–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rescher N (1998) Predicting the Future: An Introduction to the Theory of Forecasting (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Currency, New York).Google Scholar
• Rindova VP (2007) Starbucks: Constructing a multiplex identity in the specialty coffee industry. Lerpold L, Ravasi D, van Rekom J, Soenen G, eds. Organizational Identity (Routledge), 157–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Courtney HG (2020) To shape or adapt? Knowledge problems, epistemologies, and strategic postures under Knightian uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 45(4):787–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Fombrun CJ (2001) Entrepreneurial action in the creation of the specialty coffee niche. Schoonhoven CB, Romanelli E, eds. The Entrepreneurship Dynamic: Origins of Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Industries (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 236–261.Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Kotha S (2001) Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1263–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2018a) From values to value: Value rationality and the creation of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1):323–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2018b) The three minds of the strategist: Toward an agentic perspective in behavioral strategy. Augier M, Fang C, Rindova VP, eds. Advances in Strategic Management: Behavioral Strategy in Perspective, vol. 39 (Emerald Group, Bingley, UK), 167–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2021) Shaping possibilities: A design science approach to developing novel strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):800–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2022) Futurescapes: Imagination and temporal reorganization in the design of strategic narratives. Strategic Organ. 20(1):200–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2023) Moral imagination, the collective desirable, and strategic purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):170–181.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL, Yeow A (2016) The hare and the fast tortoise: Dynamic resource reconfiguration and the pursuit of new growth opportunities by Yahoo and Google (1995–2007). Advances in Strategic Management: Resource Redeployment and Corporate Strategy, vol. 35 (Emerald Group, Bingley, UK), 253–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rundell J (2021) Kant: Anthropology, Imagination, Freedom (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Schilling M (2018) The cognitive foundations of visionary strategy. Strategy Sci. 3(1):335–342.Link, Google Scholar
• Schwartz P (2012) The Art of the Long View (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Searle J (1983) Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sergeeva A, Bhardwaj A, Dimov D (2021) In the heat of the game: Analogical abduction in a pragmatist account of entrepreneurial reasoning. J. Bus. Venturing 36(6):106158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shackle GLS (1949) Probability and uncertainty. Metroeconomica 1:161–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shackle GLS (1972) Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Shackle GLS (1979) Imagination and the Nature of Choice (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1973) The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence 4(3–4):181–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Bansal P (2015) Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organ. Sci. 26(2):531–549.Link, Google Scholar
• Spaulding S (2016) Imagination through knowledge. Kind A, Kung P, eds. Knowledge Through Imagination (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 207–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szpunar KK, Spreng RN, Schacter DL (2014) A taxonomy of prospection: Introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(52):18414–18421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson D (2019) WeWork’s Adam Neumann is the most talented grifter of our time. Retrieved September 16, 2024, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/how-weworks-adam-neumann-became-billionaire/600607.Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21:1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vishwanath V, Harding D (2000) The Starbucks effect. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(2):17.Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Wuebker R, Zenger T, Felin T (2023) The theory‐based view: Entrepreneurial microfoundations, resources, and choices. Strategic Management J. 44(12):2922–2949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yelavich S, Adams B, eds. (2014) Design as Future-Making (Bloomsbury Publishing, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zagzebski L (1999) What is knowledge? Greco J, Sosa E, eds. The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 92–116.Google Scholar
• Zellweger T, Zenger T (2022) Entrepreneurs as scientists: A pragmatist alternative to the creation-discovery debate. Acad. Management Rev. 47(4):696–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellweger T, Zenger T (2023) Entrepreneurs as scientists: A pragmatist approach to producing value out of uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 48(3):379–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger T (2013) What is the theory of your firm? Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(6):72–78.Google Scholar
• Zetsche D (2015) CES 2015 Mercedes-BenzKeynote. Accessed February 16, 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMmYFxe6O-I.Google Scholar
• Zuzul TW (2019) “Matter battles”: Cognitive representations, boundary objects, and the failure of collaboration in two smart cities. Acad. Management J. 62(3):739–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia vs. flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Crossref, Google Scholar