Theory Is All You Need: AI, Human Cognition, and Causal Reasoning

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2024.0189

References

  • Achiam J, Adler S, Agarwal S, Ahmad L, Akkaya I, Aleman FL, McGrew B (2023) GPT-4 technical report. Preprint, submitted March 15, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774.Google Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Bacco F, Camuffo A, Coali A, Gambardella A, Msangi H, Wormald A (2023) Does a theory-of-value add value? Evidence from a randomized control trial with Tanzanian entrepreneurs. Preprint, submitted April 20, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4412041.Google Scholar
  • Aggarwal CC (2018) Neural Networks and Deep Learning (Springer Publishing, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2022) Prediction Machines (Updated and Expanded): The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Agrawal A, McHale J, Oettl A (2023) Superhuman science: How artificial intelligence may impact innovation. J. Evolutionary Econom. 33(5):1473–1517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, McHale J, Oettl A (2024) Artificial intelligence and scientific discovery: A model of prioritized search. Res. Policy 53(5):104989.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amaya J, Holweg M (2024) Using algorithms to improve knowledge work. J. Oper. Management 70(3):482–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ananthaswamy A (2022) DeepMind AI topples experts at complex game Stratego. Nature 604(7907):36.Google Scholar
  • Anderson JR (1990) The Adaptive Character of Thought (Psychology Press, London).Google Scholar
  • Anderson JD (2004) Inventing Flight: The Wright Brothers and Their Predecessors (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
  • Anderson C (2008) The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired 16(7).Google Scholar
  • Anglin SM (2019) Do beliefs yield to evidence? Examining belief perseverance vs. change in response to congruent empirical findings. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 82:176–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babina T, Fedyk A, He A, Hodson J (2024) Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. J. Financial Econom. 151:103745.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker B, Lansdell B, Kording KP (2022) Three aspects of representation in neuroscience. Trends Cognitive Sci. 26(11):942–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Sci. 32(10):1231–1241.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell JJ, Pescher C, Tellis GJ, Füller J (2024) Can AI help in ideation? A theory-based model for idea screening in crowdsourcing contests. Marketing Sci. 43(1):54–72.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2016) Mindful economics: The production, consumption, and value of beliefs. J. Econom. Perspect. 30(3):141–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bender EM, Gebru T, McMillan-Major A, Shmitchell S (2021) On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proc. 2021 ACM Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (ACM, New York), 610–623.Google Scholar
  • Bengio Y, Lecun Y, Hinton G (2021) Deep learning for AI. Comm. ACM 64(7):58–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bengio Y, Hinton G, Yao A, Song D, Abbeel P, Harari YN, Hadfield G, Russell S, Kahneman D, Mindermann S (2023) Managing AI risks in an era of rapid progress. Preprint, submitted October 26, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17688.Google Scholar
  • Bhatia S (2023) Inductive reasoning in minds and machines. Psych. Rev. 130(1):105–125.Google Scholar
  • Biber D (1991) Variation Across Speech and Writing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Binz M, Schulz E (2023) Turning large language models into cognitive models. Preprint, submitted June 6, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03917.Google Scholar
  • Binz M, Dasgupta I, Jagadish AK, Botvinick M, Wang JX, Schulz E (2023) Meta-learned models of cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 47:e147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bordalo P, Conlon JJ, Gennaioli N, Kwon SY, Shleifer A (2023) How people use statistics. NBER Working Paper No. 31631, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Bory P (2019) Deep new: The shifting narratives of artificial intelligence from Deep Blue to AlphaGo. Convergence 25(4):627–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bratman M (1987) Intention, Plans and Practical Reason (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Brembs B (2021) The brain as a dynamically active organ. Biochemical Biophysical Res. Comm. 564:55–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1998) Beyond the productivity paradox. Comm. ACM 41(8):49–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH (1984) Rule Based Expert Systems: The Mycin Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Buckner CJ (2023) From Deep Learning to Rational Machines: What the History of Philosophy Can Teach Us About the Future of Artificial Intelligence (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butlin P, Long R, Elmoznino E, Bengio Y, Birch J, Constant A, VanRullen R (2023) Consciousness in artificial intelligence: Insights from the science of consciousness. Preprint, submitted August 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08708.Google Scholar
  • Camuffo A, Gambardella A, Pignataro A (2022) Microfoundations of low-frequency high-impact decisions. Preprint, submitted June 23, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4144724.Google Scholar
  • Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carey S, Spelke E (1996) Science and core knowledge. Philos. Sci. 63(4):515–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang Y, Wang X, Wang J, Wu Y, Yang L, Zhu K, Xie X (2024) A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM Trans. Intelligent Systems Tech. 15(3):1–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chater N (2018) Mind Is Flat: The Remarkable Shallowness of the Improvising Brain (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Chater N, Felin T, Funder DC, Gigerenzer G, Koenderink JJ, Krueger JI, Todd PM (2018) Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 25:793–826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chollet F (2019) On the measure of intelligence. Preprint, submitted November 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547.Google Scholar
  • Chomsky N (1975) Reflections on Language (Pantheon, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chomsky N, Gallego ÁJ (2020) The faculty of language. Revista Española de Lingüística 50(1):7–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhary V, Marchetti A, Shrestha YR, Puranam P (2023) Human-AI ensembles: When can they work? J. Management. 49(2):428–456.Google Scholar
  • Christian B, Griffiths T (2016) Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Clark A (2018) A nice surprise? Predictive processing and the active pursuit of novelty. Phenomenology Cognitive Sci. 17(3):521–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clifford WK (2010) The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays (Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY).Google Scholar
  • Clough DR, Wu A (2022) Artificial intelligence, data-driven learning, and the decentralized structure of platform ecosystems. Acad. Management Rev. 47(1):184–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coady CAJ (1992) Testimony: A Philosophical Study (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Constant A, Friston KJ, Clark A (2024) Cultivating creativity: Predictive brains and the enlightened room problem. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 379(1895):20220415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (2013) Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Rev. Psych. 64:201–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crouch TD (2002) A Dream of Wings: Americans and the Airplane, 1875–1905 (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Steinberger T (2022) Organizations as artificial intelligences: The use of artificial intelligence analogies in organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Ketkar HJ, Kim H (2024) AI and strategic decision making. Working paper, Bocconi University, Milan.Google Scholar
  • Dasgupta I, Schulz E, Tenenbaum JB, Gershman SJ (2020) A theory of learning to infer. Psych. Rev. 127(3):412–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport TH, Kirby J (2016) Only Humans Need Apply: Winners and Losers in the Age of Smart Machines (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
  • Dewey J (1916) Essays in Experimental Logic (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du N, Huang Y, Dai AM, Tong S, Lepikhin D, Xu Y, Cui C (2022) Glam: Efficient scaling of language models with mixture-of-experts. Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 5547–5569.Google Scholar
  • Ehrig T, Schmidt J (2022) Theory‐based learning and experimentation: How strategists can systematically generate knowledge at the edge between the known and the unknown. Strategic Management J. 43(7):1287–1318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrig T, Felin T, Zenger T (2024) Causal reasoning and the scientific entrepreneur: Beyond Bayes. Agrawal A, Camuffo A, Gambardella A, Gans J, Scott E, Stern S, eds. Bayesian Entrepreneurship (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Eisfeldt AL, Schubert G (2024) AI and finance. Preprint, submitted October 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4988553.Google Scholar
  • Feigenbaum EA (1963) Artificial intelligence research. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 9(4):248–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Kauffman S (2023) Disruptive evolution: Harnessing functional excess, experimentation, and science as tool. Industrial Corporate Change 32(6):1372–1392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Koenderink J (2022) A generative view of rationality and growing awareness. Frontiers Psych. 13:807261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Zenger TR (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Sci. 2(4):258–271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Gambardella A, Zenger T (2021a) Value Lab: A Tool for Entrepreneurial Strategy (Management & Business Review, Columbia, ML).Google Scholar
  • Felin T, Kauffman S, Zenger T (2023) Resource origins and search. Strategic Management J. 44(6):1514–1533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Koenderink J, Krueger JI (2017) Rationality, perception, and the all-seeing eye. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 24:1040–1059.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Gambardella A, Novelli E, Zenger T (2024) A scientific method for startups. J. Management 50(8):3080–3104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Kauffman S, Koppl R, Longo G (2014) Economic opportunity and evolution: Beyond landscapes and bounded rationality. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 8(4):269–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Koenderink J, Krueger JI, Noble D, Ellis GF (2021b) The data-hypothesis relationship. Genome Biol. 22(1):1–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L, Riecken HW, Schachter S (1956) When Prophecy Fails (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franceschelli G, Musolesi M (2023) On the creativity of large language models. Preprint, submitted March 27, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00008.Google Scholar
  • Friedman JH, Popescu BE (2008) Predictive learning via rule ensembles. Ann. Appl. Statist. 2(3):916–954.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friston K, Kiebel S (2009) Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 364(1521):1211–1221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friston K, Da Costa L, Tschantz A, Kiefer A, Salvatori T, Neacsu V, Buckley CL (2023) Supervised structure learning. Preprint, submitted November 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10300.Google Scholar
  • Gagliardi L (2024) The role of cognitive biases in conspiracy beliefs: A literature review. J. Econom. Surveys. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Gans JS, Stern S, Wu J (2019) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management J. 40(5):736–756.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2018) A Crisis of Beliefs: Investor Psychology and Financial Fragility (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Gershman SJ, Horvitz EJ, Tenenbaum JB (2015) Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines. Science 349(6245):273–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (2024) Herbert Simon on the birth of the mind-computer metaphor. Augier M, March JG, eds. Elgar Companion to Herbert Simon (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilkerson J, Richards JA, Warren SF, Montgomery JK, Greenwood CR, Kimbrough Oller D, Paul TD (2017) Mapping the early language environment using all-day recordings and automated analysis. Amer. J. Speech Language Pathology 26(2):248–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gingerich O, MacLachlan J (2005) Nicolaus Copernicus: Making the Earth a Planet (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Girotra K, Meincke L, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2023) Ideas are dimes a dozen: Large language models for idea generation in innovation. Preprint, submitted August 2, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4526071.Google Scholar
  • Goldman AI (1999) Knowledge in a Social World (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Goyal A, Bengio Y (2022) Inductive biases for deep learning of higher-level cognition. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 478(2266):20210068.Google Scholar
  • Grace K, Stewart H, Sandkühler JF, Thomas S, Weinstein-Raun B, Brauner J (2024) Thousands of AI authors on the future of AI. Preprint, submitted January 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02843.Google Scholar
  • Gregory RW, Henfridsson O, Kaganer E, Kyriakou H (2021) The role of artificial intelligence and data network effects for creating user value. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):534–551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin D, Tversky A (1992) The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psych. 24(3):411–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffiths TL, Chater N, Kemp C, Perfors A, Tenenbaum JB (2010) Probabilistic models of cognition: Exploring representations and inductive biases. Trends Cognitive Sci. 14(8):357–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn U, Harris AJ (2014) What does it mean to be biased: Motivated reasoning and rationality. Ross BH, ed. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 61 (Academic Press, San Diego), 41–102.Google Scholar
  • Hahn U, Merdes C, von Sydow M (2018) How good is your evidence and how would you know? Topics Cognitive Sci. 10(4):660–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halliday MAK (1989) Spoken and Written Language (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Hart B, Risley TR (2003) The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3. Amer. Ed. 27(1):4–9.Google Scholar
  • Hasson U, Nastase SA, Goldstein A (2020) Direct fit to nature: An evolutionary perspective on biological and artificial neural networks. Neuron 105(3):416–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hebb DO (1949) The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Heisenberg M (2014) The beauty of the network in the brain and the origin of the mind in the control of behavior. J. Neurogenetics 28(3–4):389–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinton GE (1992) How neural networks learn from experience. Sci. Amer. 267(3):144–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinton GE (2023) Will digital intelligence replace biological intelligence? University of Toronto Lecture (October 27), https://youtu.be/iHCeAotHZa4.Google Scholar
  • Hohwy J (2013) The Predictive Mind (OUP Oxford, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hohwy J (2020) New directions in predictive processing. Mind Language 35(2):209–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström J, Holweg M, Lawson B, Pil FK, Wagner SM (2019) The digitalization of operations and supply chain management: Theoretical and methodological implications. J. Oper. Management 65(8):728–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holtzman A, Buys J, Du L, Forbes M, Choi Y (2019) The curious case of neural text degeneration. Preprint, submitted April 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09751.Google Scholar
  • Hong P, Ghosal D, Majumder N, Aditya S, Mihalcea R, Poria S (2024) Evaluating LLMs’ mathematical competency through ontology-guided perturbations. Preprint, submitted January 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.09395.Google Scholar
  • Jaeger J, Riedl A, Djedovic A, Vervaeke J, Walsh D (2024) Naturalizing relevance realization: Why agency and cognition are fundamentally not computational. Working paper, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.Google Scholar
  • James W (1967) The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Jia N, Luo X, Fang Z, Liao C (2024) When and how artificial intelligence augments employee creativity. Acad. Management J. 67(1):5–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental Models: Toward a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Hassabis D (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596(7873):583–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(5):1449–1475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2018) A comment on artificial intelligence and behavioral economics. Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A, eds. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 608–610.Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Sibony O, Sunstein CR (2021) Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment (Hachette Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
  • Karmiloff-Smith A, Inhelder B (1974) If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition 3(3):195–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kemp A (2023) Competitive advantages through artificial intelligence: Toward a theory of situated AI. Acad. Management Rev. 49(3):618–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keynes JM (1921) A Treatise on Probability (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
  • Kıcıman E, Ness R, Sharma A, Tan C (2023) Causal reasoning and large language models: Opening a new frontier for causality. Preprint, submitted April 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00050.Google Scholar
  • Kim H, Glaeser EL, Hillis A, Kominers SD, Luca M (2024) Decision authority and the returns to algorithms. Strategic Management J. 45(4):619–648.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knill DC, Pouget A (2004) The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neuroscience 27(12):712–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotseruba I, Tsotsos JK (2020) 40 years of cognitive architectures: Core cognitive abilities and practical applications. Artificial Intelligence Rev. 53(1):17–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kralik JD, Lee JH, Rosenbloom PS, Jackson PC Jr, Epstein SL, Romero OJ, McGreggor K (2018) Metacognition for a common model of cognition. Procedia Comput. Sci. 145:730–739.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Pereira F, Burges CJ, Bottou L, Weinberger KQ, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 25 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
  • Kruglanski AW, Jasko K, Friston K (2020) All thinking is “wishful” thinking. Trends Cognitive Sci. 24(6):413–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kvam PD, Pleskac TJ (2016) Strength and weight: The determinants of choice and confidence. Cognition 152:170–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laird JE, Lebiere C, Rosenbloom PS (2017) A standard model of the mind: Toward a common computational framework across artificial intelligence, cognitive science, neuroscience, and robotics. AI Magazine 38(4):13–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laird JE, Newell A, Rosenbloom PS (1987) SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 33(1):1–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lake BM, Baroni M (2023) Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network. Nature 623(7985):115–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhotia K, Kharitonov E, Hsu WN, Adi Y, Polyak A, Bolte B, Dupoux E (2021) On generative spoken language modeling from raw audio. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics 9:1336–1354.Google Scholar
  • Lansdell BJ, Kording KP (2019) Toward learning-to-learn. Current Opinion Behav. Sci. 29:45–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LeConte J (1888) The problem of a flying machine. Sci. Monthly 34:69–77.Google Scholar
  • LeCun Y (2017) A path to AI. Future of Life Institute Lecture (January), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bub58oYJTm0.Google Scholar
  • LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Legg S, Hutter M (2007) Universal intelligence: A definition of machine intelligence. Minds Machines 17:391–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin M (2024) AI: A bridge toward diverse intelligence and humanity’s future. Working paper, Tufts University, Medford, MA.Google Scholar
  • Lewin K (1943) Psychology and the process of group living. J. Soc. Psych. 17(1):113–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis P, Perez E, Piktus A, Petroni F, Karpukhin V, Goyal N, Kiela D (2020) Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 9459–9474.Google Scholar
  • Lu C, Lange RT, Foerster J, Clune J, Ha D (2024) The AI scientist: Toward fully automated open-ended scientific discovery. Preprint, submitted August 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06292.Google Scholar
  • Mahowald K, Ivanova AA, Blank IA, Kanwisher N, Tenenbaum JB, Fedorenko E (2024) Dissociating language and thought in large language models. Trends Cognitive Sci. 28(6):517–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manning BS, Zhu K, Horton JJ (2024) Automated social science: Language models as scientist and subjects. NBER Working Paper No. 32381, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Marr D (1982) Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Mastrogiorgio A, Felin T, Kauffman S, Mastrogiorgio M (2022) More thumbs than rules: Is rationality an exaptation? Frontiers Psych. 13:805743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCarthy J, Hayes PJ (1969) Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Machine Intelligence 4:463–502.Google Scholar
  • McCarthy J, Minsky ML, Rochester N, Shannon CE (2007) A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine 27(4):12.Google Scholar
  • McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE (1981) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psych. Rev. 88(5):375–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCorduck P (2004) Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCoy RT, Smolensky P, Linzen T, Gao J, Celikyilmaz A (2023) How much do language models copy from their training data? Evaluating linguistic novelty in text generation using RAVEN. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics 11:652–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCoy RT, Yao S, Friedman D, Hardy MD, Griffiths TL (2024) Embers of autoregression show how large language models are shaped by the problem they are trained to solve. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121(41):e2322420121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophysics 5:115–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCullough D (2015) The Wright Brothers (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Melville GW (1901) The engineer and the problem of aerial navigation. North Amer. Rev. 173(541):820–831.Google Scholar
  • Merdes C, Von Sydow M, Hahn U (2021) Formal models of source reliability. Synthese 198:5773–5801.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minaee S, Mikolov T, Nikzad N, Chenaghlu M, Socher R, Amatriain X, Gao J (2024) Large language models: A survey. Preprint, submitted February 9, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06196.Google Scholar
  • Morris MR, Sohldickstein J, Fiedel N, Warkentin T, Dafoe A, Faust A, Legg S (2023) Levels of AGI: Operationalizing progress on the path to AGI. Preprint, submitted November 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02462.Google Scholar
  • Naveed H, Khan AU, Qiu S, Saqib M, Anwar S, Usman M, Mian A (2023) A comprehensive overview of large language models. Preprint, submitted July 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06435.Google Scholar
  • Newcomb S (1901) Is the airship coming? McClure’s Magazine 17:432–435.Google Scholar
  • Newell A (1990) Unified Theories of Cognition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Newell A, Simon HA (1963) GPS, a program that simulates human thought. Feigenbaum EA, Feldman J, eds. Comput. Thought (McGraw-Hill, New York), 279–293.Google Scholar
  • Novelli E, Spina C (2022) When do entrepreneurs benefit from acting like scientists? A field experiment in the UK. Preprint, submitted July 28, 2021, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3894831.Google Scholar
  • Parr T, Friston KJ (2017) Working memory, attention, and salience in active inference. Sci. Rep. 7(1):14678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl J, Mackenzie D (2018) The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Peirce CS (1957) The logic of abduction. Thomas V, ed. Peirce’s Essays in the Philosophy of Science (Liberal Arts Press, New York), 195–205.Google Scholar
  • Perconti P, Plebe A (2020) Deep learning and cognitive science. Cognition 203:104365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pezzulo G, Parr T, Friston K (2024) Active inference as a theory of sentient behavior. Biol. Psych. 186:108741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pilgrim C, Sanborn A, Malthouse E, Hills TT (2024) Confirmation bias emerges from an approximation to Bayesian reasoning. Cognition 245:105693.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinker S (1994) The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language (William Morrow & Co., Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinker S (2021) Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Polanyi M (1958) Personal Knowledge (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Polanyi M (1974) Genius in science. Cohen RS, Wartofsky MW, eds. Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Science, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 14 (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 57–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poldrack RA (2021) The physics of representation. Synthese 199(1–2):1307–1325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Popper K (1991) All Life Is Problem Solving (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raisch S, Fomina K (2024) Combining human and artificial intelligence: Hybrid problem-solving in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. Forthcoming.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramsey FP (1931) The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Rao H, Greve HR (2024) The plot thickens: A sociology of conspiracy theories. Annual Rev. Sociol. 50:191–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rescorla M (2015) The computational theory of mind. Zalta EN, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2015 ed. (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Resnik P (2024) Large language models are biased because they are large language models. Preprint, submitted June 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13138.Google Scholar
  • Riedl R (1984) Biology of Knowledge: The Evolutionary Basis of Reason (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Roli A, Jaeger J, Kauffman SA (2022) How organisms come to know the world: Fundamental limits on artificial general intelligence. Frontiers Ecology Evolution 9:1035–1050.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenblatt F (1958) The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psych. Rev. 65(6):386–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenblatt F (1962) Principles of Neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms (Spartan Books, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Rudin C (2019) Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence 1(5):206–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(6088):533–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell SJ, Norvig P (2022) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Pearson, London).Google Scholar
  • Scheffer M, Borsboom D, Nieuwenhuis S, Westley F (2022) Belief traps: Tackling the inertia of harmful beliefs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(32):e2203149119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwöbel S, Kiebel S, Marković D (2018) Active inference, belief propagation, and the Bethe approximation. Neural Comput. 30(9):2530–2567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shazeer N, Mirhoseini A, Maziarz K, Davis A, Le Q, Hinton G, Dean J (2017) Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. Preprint, submitted January 23, https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.06538.Google Scholar
  • Shumailov I, Shumaylov Z, Zhao Y, Papernot N, Anderson R, Gal Y (2024) AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data. Nature 631(8022):755–759.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1980) Cognitive science: The newest science of the artificial. Cognitive Sci. 4(1):33–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1985a) Artificial intelligence: Current status and future potential. National Research Council Report, Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  • Simon HA (1985b) Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 79(2):293–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1990) Invariants of human behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. 41(1):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA, Newell A (1958) Heuristic problem solving: The next advance in operations research. Oper. Res. 6(1):1–10.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spelke ES, Breinlinger K, Macomber J, Jacobson K (1992) Origins of knowledge. Psych. Rev. 99(4):605–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun R, ed. (2023) The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Cognitive Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tannen D (2007) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tervo DGR, Tenenbaum JB, Gershman SJ (2016) Toward the neural implementation of structure learning. Current Opinion Neurobiology 37:99–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tranchero M, Brenninkmeijer CF, Murugan A, Nagaraj A (2024) Theorizing with large language models. Preprint, submitted October 8, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4978831.Google Scholar
  • Turing AM (1948/1992) Intelligent machinery. Ince DC, ed. Mechanical Intelligence, Collected Works of A. M. Turing (North Holland, Amsterdam), 107–127.Google Scholar
  • Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59(236):433–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
  • Wright O, Wright W (1881–1940) Wilbur and Orville Wright papers. Library of Congress. Accessed October 2023, https://www.loc.gov/collections/wilbur-and-orville-wright-papers/about-this-collection/.Google Scholar
  • Wuebker R, Zenger T, Felin T (2023) The theory-based view: Entrepreneurial microfoundations, resources, and choices. Strategic Management J. 44(12):2922–2949.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yanai I, Lercher M (2020) A hypothesis is a liability. Genome Biol. 21(1):1–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin H (2020) The crisis in neuroscience. Lowe R, Powers WT, Marken CS, eds. The Interdisciplinary Handbook of Perceptual Control Theory (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA), 23–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yiu E, Kosoy E, Gopnik A (2023) Transmission vs. truth, imitation vs. innovation: What children can do that large language and language-and-vision models cannot (yet). Perspect. Psych. Sci. 19(5):874–883.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zellweger T, Zenger T (2023) Entrepreneurs as scientists: A pragmatist alternative to the creation-discovery debate. Acad. Management Rev. 47(4):696–699.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou HY, Yu Y, Wang C, Zhang S, Gao Y, Pan J, Li W (2023) A transformer-based representation-learning model with unified processing of multimodal input for clinical diagnostics. Nature Biomedical Engrg. 7:743–755.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.