It Matters Where People Live: Innovative Collaborations and the Proximity of Inventors’ Residences

References

• Agrawal A, Cockburn I, McHale J (2006) Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. J. Econom. Geography 6(5):571–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Allen JT (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• BioCrossroads (2009) Warsaw, Indiana: The orthopedics capital of the world. BC Initiative, Inc./CICP Foundation Report, BioCrossroads, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Bormet MJ (2001) A History of the City of Warsaw—Preserving the Past for the Future (Kosciusko County Historical Society, Warsaw, IN).Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Brady T, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Hollenberg A, Lakhani KR (2017) A field experiment on search costs and the formation of scientific collaborations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(4):565–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalini C (2018) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.Link, Google Scholar
• Dzeguze AB (2009) Avoiding the “fifth Beatle” syndrome: Practical solutions to minimizing joint inventorship exposure. John Marshall Rev. Intellectual Property Law 577(2014):577–600.Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383. Google Scholar
• Fleming L, King C III, Juda AI (2007) Small worlds and regional innovation. Organ. Sci. 18(6):938–954.Link, Google Scholar
• Funk RJ, Owen-Smith J (2017) A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Sci. 63(3):791–817.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Ziedonis RH (2001) The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. 32(1):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall D, Lecuona R, Cummings JN (2017) Walk and talk: The interplay of work dependencies, spatial distance, and face-to-face communication. Acad. Management Proc. 2017(1):17302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiles M (2007) Estimates about journey to work from the 2005 ACS, C2SS, and Census 2005. Report, HHES Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD.Google Scholar
• Kabo FW, Cotton-Nessler N, Hwang Y, Levenstein MC, Owen-Smith J (2014) Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations. Res. Policy 43(9):1469–1485. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A (2018) Multicollinearity: How common factors cause type 1 errors in multivariate regression. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2362–2385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A, Praitis Hill K (2025) The VIF score. What is it good for? Absolutely nothing. Organ. Res. Methods 28(1):58–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.Google Scholar
• McDavid C (2010) I want a piece of that! How the current joint inventorship laws deal with minor contributions to inventions. Penn State Law Rev. 15(May):449–471.Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Perrone V, Zaheer A (2003) Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. 14(1):91–103.Link, Google Scholar
• Roche MP (2020) Taking innovation to the streets: Microgeography, physical structure, and innovation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 102(5):912–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Henderson JV, Thisse J-F, eds. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2119–2171.Google Scholar
• Shaver JM, Flyer F (2000) Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management J. 21(12):1075–1193.Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Bosker R (2011) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Squicciarini M, Dernis H, Criscuolo C (2013) Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic value. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper No. 2013/03, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2020) Manual of patent examining procedure (MPEP). (June 1), https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/index.html.Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Moenaert RK (1998) The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11 Part 2):S1–S18.Link, Google Scholar
• Xiao H, Wu A, Kim J (2021) Commuting and innovation: Are closer inventors more productive? J. Urban Econom. 121:103300.Crossref, Google Scholar