Rapid Learning and Adaptive Search in Complex Environments: How Underestimating Noise in Performance Feedback Can Leverage and Resolve Errors of Commission

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2024.0246

References

  • Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer Academic, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Argote L (2011) Organizational learning research: Past, present and future. Management Learn. 42(4):439–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Lee S, Park J (2021) Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions. Management Sci. 67(9):5399–5429.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Audia PG, Greve HR (2021) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Multiple Goals: A Multiple Goals Perspective (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumann O, Siggelkow N (2013) Dealing with complexity: Integrated vs. chunky search processes. Organ. Sci. 24(1):116–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baumann O, Schmidt J, Stieglitz N (2019) Effective search in rugged performance landscapes: A review and outlook. J. Management 45(1):285–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billinger S, Stieglitz N, Schumacher TR (2014) Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organ. Sci. 25(1):93–108.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Billinger S, Srikanth K, Stieglitz N, Schumacher TR (2021) Exploration and exploitation in complex search tasks: How feedback influences whether and where human agents search. Strategic Management J. 42(2):361–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blank S (2013) Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(5):63–72.Google Scholar
  • Bush RR, Mosteller F (1955) Stochastic Models for Learning (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen JS, Croson DC, Elfenbein DW, Posen HE (2018) The impact of learning and overconfidence on entrepreneurial entry and exit. Organ. Sci. 29(6):989–1009.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choi J, Levinthal D (2023) Wisdom in the wild: Generalization and adaptive dynamics. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1073–1089.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Contigiani A, Levinthal DA (2019) Situating the construct of lean start-up: Adjacent conversations and possible future directions. Indust. Corporate Change 28(3):551–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, DeGroot MH (1974) Rational expectations and Bayesian analysis. J. Political Econom. 82(3):521–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fang C, Kim J(J), Milliken FJ (2014) When bad news is sugarcoated: Information distortion, organizational search and the behavioral theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 35(8):1186–1201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith JR (1974) Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces 4(3):28–36.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ganco M (2017) NK model as a representation of innovative search. Res. Policy 46(10):1783–1800.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ganco M, Kapoor R, Lee GK (2020) From rugged landscapes to rugged ecosystems: Structure of interdependencies and firms’ innovative search. Acad. Management Rev. 45(3):646–674.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P (1991) Commitment: The Dynamics of Strategy (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation - The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Google Scholar
  • Joseph J, Gaba V (2020) Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):267–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joseph J, Rhee L, Wilson AJ (2023) Corporate hierarchy and organizational learning: Member turnover, code change, and innovation in the multiunit firm. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1332–1352.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lant TK, Mezias SJ (1990) Managing discontinuous change: A simulation study of organizational learning and entrepreneurship. Strategic Management J. 11:147–179.Google Scholar
  • Laureiro‐Martínez D, Brusoni S, Canessa N, Zollo M (2015) Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision‐making performance. Strategic Management J. 36(3):319–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee GK, Alnahedh MA (2016) Industries’ potential for interdependency and profitability: A panel of 135 industries, 1988–1996. Strategy Sci. 1(4):285–308.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leiblein MJ, Reuer JJ, Zenger T (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategy Sci. 3(4):558–573.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lenox MJ, Rockart SF, Lewin AY (2006) Interdependency, competition, and the distribution of firm and industry profits. Management Sci. 52(5):757–772.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (2021) Evolutionary Processes and Organizational Adaptation: A Mendelian Perspective on Strategic Management (Oxford University Press).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, Posen HE (2007) Myopia of selection: Does organizational adaptation limit the efficacy of population selection? Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):586–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, Schliesmann D (2024) Cautious exploitation: Learning and search in problems of evaluation and discovery. Organ. Sci. 36(2):903–917.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Organ. Learn. 14(3):19–40.Google Scholar
  • Lounamaa PH, March JG (1987) Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. 33(1):107–123.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maslach D, Branzei O, Rerup C, Zbaracki MJ (2018) Noise as signal in learning from rare events. Organ. Sci. 29(2):225–246.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Michalewicz Z, Fogel DB (2004) How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller KD, Lin SJ (2010) Different truths in different worlds. Organ. Sci. 21(1):97–114.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller KD, Zhao M, Calantone RJ (2006) Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to march’s exploration-exploitation model. Acad. Management J. 49(4):709–722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Google Scholar
  • Newell A, Simon HA (1959) The Simulation of Human Thought (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA).Google Scholar
  • Newell A, Simon HA (1961) Computer simulation of human thinking: A theory of problem solving expressed as a computer program permits simulation of thinking processes. Science 134(3495):2011–2017.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posen HE, Leiblein MJ, Chen JS (2018) Toward a behavioral theory of real options: Noisy signals, bias, and learning. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1112–1138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmandad H (2019) Interdependence, complementarity, and ruggedness of performance landscapes. Strategy Sci. 4(3):234–249.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rhee M, Kim T (2015) Great vessels take a long time to mature: Early success traps and competences in exploitation and exploration. Organ. Sci. 26(1):180–197.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2006) When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search. Acad. Management J. 49(4):779–795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1990) Invariants of human behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. 41(1):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Valente M (2014) An NK-like model for complexity. J. Evolutionary Econom. 24(1):107–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Den Steen E (2011) Overconfidence by Bayesian-rational agents. Management Sci. 57(5):884–896.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winter SG, Cattani G, Dorsch A (2007) The value of moderate obsession: Insights from a new model of organizational search. Organ. Sci. 18(3):403–419.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yi S, Knudsen T, Becker MC (2016) Inertia in Routines: A hidden source of organizational variation. Organ. Sci. 27(3):782–800.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J, Cheung B, Finn C, Levine S, Jayaraman D (2020) Cautious adaptation for reinforcement learning in safety-critical settings. Proc. 37th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., vol. 119 (PMLR, New York), 11055–11065.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.