A Robust Solution Approach to the Dynamic Vehicle Scheduling Problem

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1030.0069

References

  • Bertossi A. A., Carraresi P., Gallo G. On some matching problems arising in vehicle scheduling models. Networks (1987) 17:271–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daduna J. R., Mojsilovic M., Schütze P., Du D. -Z., Pardalos P. M. Practical experiences using an interactive optimization procedure for vehicle scheduling. Network Optimization Problems: Algorithms, Applications and Complexity (1993) (World Scientific, Singapore) 37–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desrosiers J., Dumas Y., Solomon M. M., Soumis F., Ball M. O., Magnanti T. L., Monma C. L., Nemhauser G. L. Time constrained routing and scheduling. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (1995) Vol. 8(North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 35–139Network RoutingGoogle Scholar
  • Freling R., Pinto Paixão J. M., Wagelmans A. P. M. Models and algorithms for single-depot vehicle scheduling. Transportation Sci. (2001) 35:165–180LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haase K., Desaulniers G., Desrosiers J. Simultaneous vehicle and crew scheduling in urban mass transit systems. Transportation Sci. (2001) 35:286–303LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ichoua S., Gendreau M., Potvin J.-Y. Diversion issues in real-time vehicle dispatching. Transportation Sci. (2000) 34:426–438LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lamatsch A., Desrochers M., Rousseau J. -M. An approach to vehicle scheduling with depot capacity constraints. Computer-Aided Transit Scheduling (1992) (Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 181–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laporte G., Louveaux F. V. Solving stochastic routing problems with the integer L-shaped method. Fleet Management and Logistics (1998) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) 159–167CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Löbel A. Optimal vehicle scheduling in public transit. (1997) (Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany) . Unpublished doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen O. B. G., Ravn H. F., Rygaard J. M. A heuristic algorithm for a dial-a-ride problem with time windows, multiple capacities and multiple objectives. Ann. Oper. Res. (1995) 60:193–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mesquita M., Paixão J., Wilson N. H. M. Exact algorithms for the multiple-depot vehicle scheduling problem based on multicommodity network flow type formulations. Computer-Aided Transit Scheduling (1999) (Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 223–246Google Scholar
  • Powell W. B., Jaillet P., Odoni A., Ball M. O., Magnanti T. L., Monma C. L., Nemhauser G. L. Stochastic and dynamic networks and routing. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (1995) Vol. 8(North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 141–295Network RoutingGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. B., Towns M. T., Marar A. On the value of optimal myopic solutions for dynamic routing and scheduling problems in the presence of noncompliance. Transportation Sci. (2000) 34:67–85LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ribeiro C. C., Soumis F. A column generation approach to the multiple-depot vehicle scheduling problem. Operations Res. (1994) 42:41–52LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sleator D. D., Tarjan R. E. Amortized efficiency of list update and paging rules. Com. ACM (1985) 28:202–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yen J. W., Birge J. R. A stochastic programming approach to the airline crew scheduling problem. (2002) . Technical report, Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.