Multiobjective Path Finding in Stochastic Dynamic Networks, with Application to Routing Hazardous Materials Shipments

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1040.0094

References

  • Ahuja R. K., Magnanti T. L., Orlin J. B.Network Flows (1993) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bellman R. On a routing problem. Quart. Appl. Math. (1958) 16:87–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Akiva M., de Palma A., Kaysi I. Dynamic network models and driver information systems. Transportation Res. A (1991) 25:251–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry D. S., Belmont D. M. Distribution of vehicle speeds and travel times. Proc. 2nd Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. (1951) 589–602Google Scholar
  • Berry D. S., Green F. H. Overall speeds of motor vehicles in urban areas. Proc. Highway Res. Board (1949) 29:311–318Google Scholar
  • Blue V. J., Adler J. L., List G. F. Real-time multiple-objective path search for in-vehicle route guidance systems. Transportation Res. Records (1997) 1588:10–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyce D. V. Route guidance systems for improving urban travel and location choices. Transportation Res. A (1988) 22A(4):275–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheung R. K. Iterative methods for dynamic stochastic shortest path problems. Naval Res. Logist. (1998) 45(8):769–789CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Current J., Marsh M. Multiobjective transportation network design and routing problems: Taxonomy and annotation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 65:4–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erkut E., Ingolfsson A. Catastrophe avoidance models for hazardous materials route planning. Transportation Sci. (2000) 34(2):165–179LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erkut E., Verter V., Drezner Z. Hazardous materials logistics. Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods (1995) (Springer-Verlag, New York) . Ch. 20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erkut E., Verter V. Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(5):625–642LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fu L., Rilett L. R. Expected shortest paths in dynamic and stochastic traffic networks. Transportation Res. B (1998) 32:499–516CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hadar J., Russell W. R. Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1969) 59:25–34Google Scholar
  • Hall R. W. The fastest path through a network with random time-dependent travel times. Transportation Sci. (1986) 20:182–188LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanoch G., Levy H. The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1969) 36:335–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart R. G. A close approximation related to the error function. Math. Comput. (1966) 20(96):600–602CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harwood D. W., Viner J. G., Russell E. R. Procedure for developing truck accident and release rates for hazmat routing. J. Transportation Engrg. (1993) 119:189–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaufman D., Smith R. Fastest paths in time-dependent networks for intelligent vehicle highway systems applications. IVHS J. (1993) 1:1–11Google Scholar
  • Kulkarni V. G. Shortest paths in networks with exponentially distributed arc lengths. Networks (1986) 16:255–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee C.-K. A multiple-path routing strategy for vehicle route guidance systems. Transportation Res. C (1994) 2(3):185–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List G. F., Mirchandani P. B., Turnquist M. A., Zografos K. G. Modeling and analysis for hazardous materials transportation: Risk analysis, routing/scheduling and facility location. Transportation Sci. (1991) 25:100–114LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loui R. P. Optimal paths in graphs with stochastic or multidimensional weights. Comm. ACM (1983) 26:670–676CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McShane W., Crowley K. Regularity of some detector-observed arterial traffic volume characteristics. Transportation Res. Records (1976) 596:33–37Google Scholar
  • Miller-Hooks E. D., Mahmassani H. S. Least possible time paths in stochastic, time-varying networks. Comput. Oper. Res. (1998a) 25:1107–1125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller-Hooks E. D., Mahmassani H. S. Optimal routing of hazardous materials in stochastic, time-varying transportation networks. Transportation Res. Records (1998b) 1645:143–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller-Hooks E. D., Mahmassani H. S. Least expected time paths in stochastic, time-varying transportation networks. Transportation Sci. (2000) 34(2):198–215LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nembhard D. A. Heuristic path selection in graphs with non-order preserving reward structure. (1994) . Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  • Nozick L. K., List G. F., Turnquist M. A. Integrated routing and scheduling in hazardous materials transportation. Transportation Sci. (1997) 31:200–215LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pretolani D. A directed hypergraph model for random time dependent shortest paths. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2000) 123:315–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saccomanno F. F., Chan A. Y.-W. Economic evaluation of routing strategies for hazardous road shipments. Transportation Res. Records (1985) 1020:12–18Google Scholar
  • Schrank D., Lomax T.The 2003 Annual Urban Mobility Report (2003) (Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX) Google Scholar
  • Sulijoadikusumo G. S., Nozick L. K. Multiobjective routing and scheduling of hazardous materials shipments. Transportation Res. Records (1998) 1613:96–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suri A. Heuristics for the stochastic and dynamic shortest path problem. (1993) . M.S. thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  • Turnquist M. A., Lev B., Bloom J. A., Gleit A. S., Murphy F. H., Shoemaker C. A. Routes, schedules, and risks in transportation of hazardous materials. Strategic Planning in Energy and Natural Resources (1987) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)289–302Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Commerce (1994) . Truck inventory and use survey. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Transportation (1997) . National ITS/CVO program http://www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov//JPODOCS/REPTS_TE/2KL01!.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Transportation (1998) . Hazardous materials shipments. Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  • Watling D., van Vuren T. The modelling of dynamic route guidance systems. Transportation Res. C (1993) 1(2):159–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wellman M. P., Ford M., Larson K. Path planning under time-dependent uncertainty. Proc. 11th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1995) Montreal, Quebec, Canada:532–539Google Scholar
  • Wijeratne A. B., Turnquist M. A., Mirchandani P. B. Multiobjective routing of hazardous materials in stochastic networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 65:33–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.