Double-Cycling Strategies for Container Ships and Their Effect on Ship Loading and Unloading Operations

References

• Bendall H. B., Stent A. F. Hatchcoverless container ships: Productivity gains from a new technology. Maritime Policy Management (1996) 23(2):187–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilho B. D., Daganzo C. F. Handling strategies for import containers at marine terminals. Trans. Res. Part B (1993) 27:151–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christiansen M., Fagerholt K., Nygreen B., Ronen D., Barnhart C., Laporte G. Maritime transportation. Transportation Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (2005) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Crainic T. G., Kim K. H., Barnhart C., Laporte G. Intermodal transportation. Transportation Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (2005) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Daganzo C. F. The crane scheduling probem. Trans. Res. Part B (1989) 23:159–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daganzo C. F. The productivity of multipurpose seaport terminals. Trans. Sci. (1990) 24(3):205–216Link, Google Scholar
• Garcia B. (2003–2005) . Personal communications. Transystems CorportationGoogle Scholar
• Goodchild A. V. Crane double cycling in container ports: Algorithms, evaluation, and planning. (2005) . Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Imai A., Nishimura E., Papadimitriou S. The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port. Trans. Res. Part B (2001) 35:401–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson S. M. Optimal two- and three-stage production schedules with setup times included. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1954) 1:61–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K. H., Bae J. W. A dispatching method for automated guided vehicles to minimize delay of containership operations. Internat. J. Managment Sci. (1999) 5:1–25Google Scholar
• Kim K. H., Kim H. B. The optimal sizing of the storage space and handling facilities for import containers. Trans. Res. Part B (2002) 36:821–835Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K. H., Kang J. S., Ryu K. R. A beam search algorithm for the load sequencing of outbound containers in port container terminals. Oper. Res. Spectrum (2004) 26(10):93–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai K. K., Leung J. Analysis of gate house operations in a container terminal. Internat. J. Modeling Simulation (2000) 20:89–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mongelluzzo B. L.A. won’t see peak repeat. J. Commerce (2005a) 6(24):12Google Scholar
• Mongelluzzo B. Ports rush to keep up. J. Commerce (2005b) 6:26–30Google Scholar
• Park Y. M., Kim K. H. A scheduling method for berth and quay cranes. Oper. Res. Spectrum (2003) 25:1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterofsky R. I., Daganzo C. F. A branch and bound solution method for the crane scheduling problem. Trans. Res. Part B (1990) 24:159–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schonfeld P., Sharafeldien O. Optimal berth and crane combinations. J. Waterway, Port, Coastal Ocean Engrg. (1985) 111:1060–1072Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taleb-Ibrahimi M., Castilho B., Daganzo C. F. Storage space vs. handling work in container terminals. Trans. Res. Part B (1993) 27:13–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• TranSystems Corporation Efficient marine terminal full scale demonstration. (2003) . http://www.ccdott.orgGoogle Scholar
• Vis I. F. A., de Koster R., Roodbergen K. J. Determination of the number of automated guided vehicles required at a semi-automated container terminal. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2001) 52:409–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward T. (2003–2005) . Personal communications. JWD GroupGoogle Scholar