The Effect of Reference Point on Stochastic Network Equilibrium

References

• Abdellaoui M. Parameter-free elicitation of utilities and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1497–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Allais M. Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique le postulats et axioms de L’École Américaine. Econometrica (1953) 21:503–546Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allais M., Hagen O.Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox (1979) (Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K. J.Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing (1965) (Yrjo Hahnsson Foundation, Helsinki, Finland) Google Scholar
• Avineri E. A cumulative prospect theory approach to passengers behavior modeling: Waiting time paradox revisited. J. Intelligent Transportation Systems (2004) 8:195–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avineri E., Prashker J. N. Sensitivity to uncertainty: The need for a paradigm shift. Transportation Res. Record (2003) 1854:90–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avineri E., Prashker J. N. Violations of expected utility theory in route-choice stated preferences: The certainty effect and inflating of small probabilities. Transportation Res. Record (2004) 1894:222–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bateman I., Kahneman D., Munro A., Starmer C., Sugden R. Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. J. Public Econom. (2005) 89:1561–1580Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G. S. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. J. Political Econom. (1968) 76:169–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S., Thaler R. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110:73–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernasconi M. Tax evasion and orders of risk aversion. J. Public Econom. (1998) 67:123–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernoulli D. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Papers Imp. Acad. Sci. St. Petersburg (1738) 5:175–192Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk, trans. 1954. Econometrica 22 23–36Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H., Pinto J. L. A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1485–1496Link, Google Scholar
• Bonsall P. W. Predicting travellers’ response to uncertainty. 9th Internat. Conf. Travel Behav. Res. (2000a) Gold Coast, Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
• Bonsall P. W., Bell M. G. H., Cassir C. Travellers’ response to uncertainty. Reliability of Transport Networks (2000b) (Research Studies Press, Baldock, Hertfordshire, UK) 1–10Google Scholar
• Bovy P. H. L., Stern E.Route Choice: Wayfinding in Transport Networks (1990) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F. An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. J. Risk Uncertainty (1988) 2:61–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Ho T.-H. Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. J. Risk Uncertainty (1994) 8:167–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen A., Ji Z., Recker W. W. Travel time reliability with risk-sensitive travelers. Transportation Res. Record (2002) 1783:27–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein L. G., Zin S. E. First-order’ risk aversion and the equity premium puzzle. J. Monetary Econom. (1990) 26:387–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fennema H., van Assen H. Measuring the utility of losses by means of the trade-off method. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 17:277–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P. C., Kochenberger G. A. Two-piece Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions. Decision Sci. (1979) 10:503–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox C. R., Rogers B. A., Tversky A. Options traders exhibit subadditive decision weights. J. Risk Uncertainty (1996) 13:5–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman M., Savage L. J. The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J. Political Econom. (1948) 56:279–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Levine D. K.The Theory of Learning in Games (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Fujii S., Kitamura R. Framing uncertain travel times: A re-examination of departure time choice. 9th Internat. Conf. Travel Behav. Res. (2000) Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
• Gärling T., Ortúzar J. de D., Hensher D., Jara-Diaz S. Behavioural assumptions overlooked in travel-choice modeling. Travel Behaviour Research: Updating the State of Play (1998) (Pergamon, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R., Wu G. On the form of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38:129–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison G. W., Rutström E. E. Representative agents in lottery choice experiments: One wedding and a decent funeral. (2005) . Working Paper 05-18, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
• Herrnstein R. J., Rachlin H., Laibson D. I. The matching law. Papers in Psychology and Economics (1997) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristensen H., Gärling T. Adoption of cognitive reference points in negotiations. Acta Psychologica (1997) 97:277–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmassani H. S., Chang G. L. Dynamic aspects of departure time choice behavior in a commuting system: Theoretical framework and experimental analysis. Transportation Res. Record (1985) 1037:88–101Google Scholar
• Mahmassani H. S., Chang G. L. On boundedly rational user equilibrium in transportation systems. Transportation Sci. (1987) 21:89–99Link, Google Scholar
• Mahmassani H. S., Jou R.-C. Transferring insights into commuter behavior dynamics from laboratory experiments to field surveys. Transportation Res. Part A (2000) 34:243–260Google Scholar
• March J. G. Learning to be risk averse. Psych. Rev. (1996) 103:309–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mirchandani P. B., Soroush S. Generalized traffic equilibrium with probabilistic travel times and perceptions. Transportation Sci. (1987) 21:133–152Link, Google Scholar
• Noland R. B., Small K. A. Travel time uncertainty, departure time choice and the cost of the morning commute. Transportation Res. Record (1995) 1493:150–158Google Scholar
• Powell M., Davis A. Aggregating small time saving in UK trunk road scheme appraisals. (1996) . Discussion Note E96/02, Leeds University Business School, UKGoogle Scholar
• Pratt J. W. Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1964) 32:122–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D. The probability weighting function. Econometrica (1998) 66:497–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage I. R.The Foundations of Statistics (1954) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Senbil M., Kitamura R. Reference points in commuter departure time choice: A prospect theoretic test of alternative decision frames. Intelligent Transportation Systems J. (2004) 8:19–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Models of Man: Social and National (1957) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Small K. A. The scheduling of consumer activities: Work trips. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72:467–479Google Scholar
• Tatineni M., Boyce D. E., Mirchandani P. Experiments to compare deterministic and stochastic network traffic loading models. Transportation Res. Record (1997) 1607:16–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H., Tversky A., Kahneman D., Schwartz A. The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112:647–661Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Fox C. Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. (1995) 102:269–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106:1039–1061Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 9:195–230Google Scholar
• Ushiwaka K., Kikuchi A., Kitamura R. Commuters’ perception of travel time and uncertainty under congestion pricing: Exploration of a six-week field experiment data. Internat. Conf. Experiments Econom. Sci. (2004) Okayama/Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
• Viti F., Bogers E., Hoogendoorn S. Day-to-day learning under uncertainty with information provision: Model and data analysis. 16th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (2005) (University of Maryland, College Park, MD (July)) Google Scholar
• von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Wardrop J. G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc. Inst. Civil Engineers, Part II (1952) 1:325–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• White S. B., Valley K. L., Bazerman M. H., Neale M. A., Peck S. R. Alternative models of price behavior in dyadic negotiations: Market prices, reservation prices, and negotiator assumptions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 57:430–447Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu G., Gonzalez R. Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1676–1690Link, Google Scholar