Empirical Features of Congested Traffic States and Their Implications for Traffic Modeling

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1070.0192

References

  • Banks J. H. Two-capacity phenomenon at freeway bottlenecks: A basis for ramp meeting? Transportation Res. Record (1991a) 1320:83–90Google Scholar
  • Banks J. H. The two-capacity phenomenon: Some theoretical issues. Transportation Res. Record (1991b) 1320:234–241Google Scholar
  • Banks J. H. An investigation of some characteristics of congested flow. Transportation Res. Record (1999) 1678:128–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertini R. L., Lindgren R., Helbing D., Schönhof M. Empirical analysis of flow features on a German autobahn. Proc. 83rd Annual Meeting Transportation Res. Board (2004) Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Cassidy M. J., Bertini R. L. Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks. Transportion Res. Part B (1999) 33:25–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cassidy M. J., Mauch M. An observed traffic pattern in long freeway queues. Transportation Res. Part A (2001) 35:143–156Google Scholar
  • Cassidy M. J., Windover J. R. Methodology for assessing dynamics of freeway traffic flow. Transportation Res. Record (1995) 1484:73–79Google Scholar
  • Coifman B. Estimating travel times and vehicle trajectories in freeways using dual loop detectors. Transportation Res. Part A (2002) 36:351–364Google Scholar
  • Cremer M.Der Verkehrsflußauf Schnellstraßen. Modelle, Überwachung, Regelung (1979) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Daganzo C. F. The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transportation Res. Part B (1994) 28:269–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo C. F. A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow. Transportation Res. Part B (1995a) 29:261–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo C. F. Requiem for second-order fluid approximations of traffic flow. Transportation Res. Part B (1995b) 29:277–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo C. F. A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. I: Long homogeneous freeway sections. Transportation Res. Part B (2002a) 36:131–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo C. F. A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. II: Merges and the onset of congestion. Transportation Res. Part B (2002b) 36:159–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo C. F., Cassidy M. J., Bertini R. L. Possible explanations of phase transitions in highway traffic. Transportation Res. Part A (1999) 33:365–379Google Scholar
  • Edie L. C., Baverez E., Edie L., Herman R., Rothery R. Generation and propagation of stop-start traffic waves. Vehicular Traffic Science, Proc. 3rd Internat. Sympos. Theory Traffic Flow (1965) New York:26–37Google Scholar
  • Edie L. C., Foote R. S. Effect of shock waves on tunnel traffic flow. Proc. Highway Res. Board (1960) 37(Transportation Research Board of the National Academies)492–505Google Scholar
  • Gazis P. C., Herman R. The moving and “phantom” bottlenecks. Transportation Sci. (1992) 26:223–229LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. Gas-kinetic derivation of navier-stokes-like traffic equations. Phys. Rev. E (1996) 53:2366–2381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. Fundamentals of traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E (1997a) 55:3735–3738CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. Modelling multi-lane traffic flow with queuing effects. Physica A (1997b) 242:175–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Papageorgiou M., Pouliezos A. Traffic data and their implications for consistent traffic flow modeling. Transportation Systems (1997c) (International Federation of Automatic Control, Chania, Greece) 809–814Google Scholar
  • Helbing D.Verkehrsdynamik (1997d) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. Structure and instability of high-density equations for traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E (1998) 57:6176–6179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. Die wundervolle Welt aktiver Vielteilchensystme. Physikalische Blätter (2001a) 57:27–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Rev. Modern Phys. (2001b) 73:1067–1141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D. A section-based queueing-theoretical traffic model for congestion and travel time analysis in networks. J. Phys. A: Math. General (2003) 36:L593–L598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Greiner A. Modelling and simulation of multilane traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E (1997) 55:5498–5507CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Treiber M. Numerical simulation of macroscopic traffic equations. Comput. Sci. Engrg. (CiSE) (1999) 5:89–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Hennecke A., Treiber M. Phase diagram of traffic states in the presence of inhomogeneities. Phys. Rev. Lett. (1999) 82:4360–4363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Hennecke A., Shvetsov V., Treiber M. MASTER: Macroscopic traffic simulation based on a gas-kinetic, non-local traffic model. Transportation Res. Part B (2001) 35:183–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Hennecke A., Shvetsov V., Treiber M. Micro- and macrosimulation of freeway traffic. Math. Comput. Model. (2002) 35:517–547CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Farkas I. J., Fasold D., Treiber M., Vicsek T., Fukui M., Sugiyama Y., Schreckenberg M., Wolf D. E. Critical discussion of ”synchronized flow,” pedestrian evacuation, and optimal production. Proc. Traffic Granular Flow ’01 (2003) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) 511–530CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D., Johansson A., Mathiesen J., Jensen M. H., Hansen A. Analytical approach to continuous and intermittent bottleneck flows. Physical Rev. Lett. (2006) 97:1–4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoogendoorn S., Bovy P. H. L.Continuum Modelling of Multi-Lane Heterogeneous Traffic Flow Operations (1998) (TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Kerner B. S. Experimental features of self-organization in traffic flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. (1998a) 81:3797–3800CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Rysgaard R. A theory of congested traffic flow. Proc. 3rd Internat. Sympos. Highway Capacity (1998b) 2(Road Directorate, Copenhagen, Denmark) 621–642Google Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Ceder A. Theory of congested traffic flow: Self-organization without bottlenecks. Proc. 14th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (1999) (Pergamon, New York) 147–171Google Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Helbing D., Herrmann H. J., Schreckenberg M., Wolf D. E. Phase transitions in traffic flow. Proc. Traffic Granular Flow ’99: Social, Traffic and Granular Dynamics (2000a) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) 253–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S. Theory of breakdown phenomenon at highway bottlenecks. Transportation Res. Record (2000b) 1710:136–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S. Verfahren zur Verkehrszustandsüberwachung für ein Verkehrsnetz mit effektiven Engstellen. (2001) . German Patent DE 199 44 075 C2Google Scholar
  • Kerner B. S. Empirical features of congested patterns at highway bottlenecks. Transportation Res. Record (2002a) 1802:145–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S. Empirical macroscopic features of spatiotemporal traffic patterns at highway bottlenecks. Phys. Rev. E (2002b) 65:1–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S.The Physics of Traffic (2004) (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Mahmassani H. S. Microscopic three-phase traffic theory and its applications for freeway traffic control. Proc. 16th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (2005) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 181–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Konhäuser P. Cluster effect in initially homogeneous traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E (1993) 48:R2335–R2338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Konhäuser P. Structure and parameters of clusters in traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E (1994a) 50:54–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Konhäuser P. Structure and parameters of clusters in traffic flow. Physical Rev. E (1994b) 50:54–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Rehborn H. Experimental features and characteristics of traffic jams. Phys. Rev. E (1996a) 53:R1297–R1300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Rehborn H. Experimental properties of complexity in traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E (1996b) 53:R4275–R4278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Rehborn H. Experimental properties of phase transitions in traffic flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. (1997) 79:4030–4033CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Rehborn H. Über zwei Arten von Phasenübergängen im Verkehrsfluss und den daraus resultierenden drei Arten von Kapazitäten im Verkehr. Internationales Verkehrswesen (1998) 5:347–348Google Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Rehborn H. Verfahren zur Verkehrszustandsüberwachung und Fahrzeugzuflusssteuerung in einem Strassenverkehrsnetz. (2000) . German Patent DE 198 35 979 A1Google Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Aleksic M., Denneler M. Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Verkehrszustandsüberwachung. (2001) . German Patent DE 199 44 077 C2Google Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Kirschfink H., Rehborn H. Verfahren zur automatischen Verkehrsüberwachung mit Staudynamikanalyse. (1998) . German Patent DE 196 47 127 C2Google Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Klenov S. L., Konhäuser P. Asymptotic theory of traffic jams. Phys. Rev. E (1997) 56:4200–4216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner B. S., Rehborn H., Aleksic M., Haug A. Recognition and tracking of spatial-temporal congested traffic patterns on freeways. Transportation Res. Part C (2004) 12:369–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klar A., Wegener R. A hierarchy of models for multilane traffic. I: Modeling. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1999a) 59:983–1001CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klar A., Wegener R. A hierarchy of models for multilane traffic. II: Numerical investigations. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1999b) 59:1002–1011CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koshi M., Iwasaki M., Ohkura I., Hurdle V. F., Hauer E., Stewart G. N. Some findings and an overview on vehicular flow characteristics. Proc. 8th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Flow Theory (1983) (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario) 403–426Google Scholar
  • Kronjäger W., Konhäuser P., Papageorigiou M., Pouliezos A. Applied traffic flow simulation. Transportation Systems (1997) II(International Federation of Automatic Controlm Chania, Greece) 805–808Google Scholar
  • Kühne R. D., Volmuller I., Hamerslag R. Macroscopic freeway model for dense traffic—stop-start waves and incident detection. Proc. 9th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (1984) (VNU Science Press, Utrecht, The Netherlands) 21–42Google Scholar
  • Kühne R. D., Gartner N. H., Wilson N. H. M. Freeway speed distribution and acceleration noise—calculations from a stochastic continuum theory and comparison with measurements. Proc. 10th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (1987) (Elsevier, New York) 119–137Google Scholar
  • Laval J. A., Daganzo C. F. Multi-lane hybrid traffic flow model: Quantifying the impacts of lane-changing maneuvers on traffic flow. (2004) . Working Paper UCB-ITS-WP-2004-1, Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Laval J. A., Daganzo C. F. Lane-changing in traffic streams. Transportation Res. Part B (2006) 40:251–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lebacque J. P., Lesort J. B. The Godunov scheme and what it means for first order traffic flow models. Transportation and Traffic Theory. Proc. 13th Internat. Sympos. Transporation Traffic Theory (1996) (Pergamon, Oxford) 647–677Google Scholar
  • Lebacque J.-P., Khoshyaran M. M., Mahmassani H. S. First-order macroscopic traffic flow models: Intersection modeling, network modeling. Transportation and Traffic Theory—Flow, Dynamics and Human Interaction, Proc. 16th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (2005) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 365–386Google Scholar
  • Lee H., Lee H., Kim D. Dynamic states of a contiuum traffic equation with on-ramp. Phys. Rev. E (1999) 59:5101–5111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H., Lee H., Kim D. Phase diagram of congested traffic flow: An empirical study. Phys. Rev. E (2000) 62:4737–4741CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lighthill M. J., Whitham G. B. On kinematic waves: II. A theory of traffic on long crowded roads. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A (1955) 229:317–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin W.-H., Lo H. K. A theoretical probe of a German experiment on stationary moving traffic jams. Transportation Res. Part B (2003) 37:251–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mauch M., Cassidy M. J., Taylor M. A. P. Freeway traffic oscillations: Observations and predictions. Proc. 15th Internat. Sympos. Traffic Transportation Theory (2002) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 653–674CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mika H. S., Kreer J. B., Yuan L. S. Dual mode behavior of freeway traffic. Highway Res. Record (1969) 279:1–13Google Scholar
  • Muñoz J. C., Daganzo C. F. Experimental observations upstream of an active bottleneck caused by a freeway off-ramp. (1999) . PATH working paper, California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Richmond, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Muñoz J. C., Daganzo C. F. The bottleneck mechanism of a freeway diverge. Transportation Res. Part A (2002a) 36:483–505Google Scholar
  • Muñoz J. C., Daganzo C. F. Fingerprinting traffic from static freeway sensors. Cooper@tive Tr@nsport@tion Dyn@mics (2002b) 1:1.1–1.11Google Scholar
  • Muñoz J. C., Daganzo C. F. Structure of the transition zone behind freeway queues. Transportation Sci. (2003) 37:312–329LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nagel K., Nelson P., Mahmassani H. S. A critical comparison of the kinematic-wave model with observational data. Proc. 16th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Flow Theory (2005) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 145–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell G. F.Applications of Queuing Theory (1982) (Chapman and Hall, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nishinari K., Treiber M., Helbing D. Interpreting the wide scattering of synchronized traffic data by time gap statistics. Phys. Rev. E (2003) 68:1–4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Papageorgiou M.Applications of Automatic Control Concepts to Traffic Flow Modelling and Control (1983) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paveri-Fontana S. L. On Boltzmann-like treatments for traffic flow. A critical review of the basic model and an alternative proposal for dilute traffic analysis. Transportation Res. (1975) 9:225–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Payne H., Bekey G. A. Models of freeway traffic and control. Mathematical Models of Public Systems (1971) 1(Simulation Council, La Jolla, CA) 51–61Google Scholar
  • Payne H. FREFLO: A macroscopic simulation model of freeway traffic. Transportation Res. Record (1979) 722:68–77Google Scholar
  • Persaud B. N., Hurdle V. F., Brannolte U. Freeway capacity: Definition and measurement issues. Proc. 3rd Internat. Sympos. Highway Capacity Level Service (1991) (A. A. Balkema Press, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) 289–307Google Scholar
  • Persaud B. N., Yagar S., Brownlee R. Exploration of the breakdown phenomenon in freeway traffic. Transportation Res. Record (1998) 1634:64–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips W. F. Kinetic model for traffic flow. (1977) . Tech. Rep. DOT/RSPD/DPB/50-77/17, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161Google Scholar
  • Phillips W. F. A kinetic model for traffic flow with continuum implications. Transportation Planning Tech. (1979a) 5:131–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips W. F. A new continuum traffic model obtained from kinetic theory. Proc. 1978 IEEE Conf. Decision Control (1979b) (IEEE, New York) 1032–1036Google Scholar
  • Prigogine I., Herman R. A Boltzmann-like approach to the statistical theory of traffic flow. Sympos. Theory Traffic Flow 1959, Warren, MI (1961) (Elsevier, New York) 148–164Google Scholar
  • Richards P. I. Shock waves on the highway. Oper. Res. (1956) 4:42–51LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schönhof M., Helbing D. Empirical features of congested traffic states and their implications for traffic modeling. (2004) . cond-mat/0408138Google Scholar
  • Shvetsov V., Helbing D. Macroscopic dynamics of multi-lane traffic. Phys. Rev. E (1999) 59:6328–6339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sugiyama Y., Nakayama A., Fukui M., Hasebe K., Kikuchi M., Nishinari K., Tadaki S. I., Yukawa S., Hoogendoorn S. P., Luding S., Bovy P. H. L., Schreckenberg M., Wolf D. E. Observation, theory and experiment for freeway traffic as physics of many-body system. Proc. Traffic Granular Flow ’03 (2005) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) 45–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tilch B., Helbing D., Helbing D., Herrmann H. J., Schreckenberg M., Wolf D. E. Evaluation of single vehicle data in dependence of the vehicle-type, lane, and site. Proc. Traffic Granular Flow ’99 (2000) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) 333–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treiber M., Helbing D. Macroscopic simulation of widely scattered synchronized traffic states. J. Phys. A: Math. General (1999) 32:L17–L32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treiber M., Helbing D. Reconstructing the spatio-temporal traffic dynamics from stationary detector data. Cooper@tive Tr@nsport@tion Dyn@mics (2002) 1:3.1–3.24Google Scholar
  • Treiber M., Hennecke A., Helbing D. Derivation, properties, and simulation of a gas-kinetic-based, non-local traffic model. Phys. Rev. E (1999) 59:239–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treiber M., Hennecke A., Helbing D. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E (2000) 62:1805–1824CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treiber M., Kesting A., Helbing D. Understanding widely scattered traffic flows, the capacity drop, and platoons as effects of variance-driven time gaps. Phys. Rev. E (2006) 74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treiterer J., Myers J. A., Buckley D. The hysteresis phenomenon in traffic flow. Proc. 6th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (1974) (Reed, London, UK) 13–38Google Scholar
  • Treiterer J., Taylor J. I. Traffic flow investigations by photogrammetric techniques. Highway Res. Record (1966) 142:1–12Google Scholar
  • Wagner C., Hoffmann C., Sollacher R., Wagenhuber J., Schürmann B. Second-order continuum traffic flow model. Phys. Rev. E (1996) 54:5073–5085CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westland D., Rysgaard R. Effect of highway geometry on freeway queuing at merge sections. Proc. 3rd Internat. Sympos. Highway Capacity (1998) 2(Road Directorate, Denmark) 1095–1116Google Scholar
  • Whitham G.Linear and Nonlinear Waves (1974) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Windover J. R. Empirical studies of the dynamic features of freeway traffic. (1998) . Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Yi J., Lin H., Alvarez L., Horowitz R. Stability of macroscopic traffic flow modeling through wavefront expansion. Transportation Res. Part B (2003) 37:661–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.