A Sequential Stochastic Security System Design Problem for Aviation Security

References

• Babu V. L., Batta R., Lin L. Passenger grouping under constant threat probability in an airport security system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006) 168:633–644Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett A. The worst day ever. OR/MS Today (2001) 28:28–31Google Scholar
• Barnett A. CAPPS II: The foundation of aviation security? Risk Anal. (2004) 24:909–916Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett A., Higgins M. K. Airline safety: The last decade. Management Sci. (1989) 35:1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Barnett A., Abraham M., Schimmel V. Airline safety: Some empirical findings. Management Sci. (1979) 25:1045–1056Link, Google Scholar
• Barnett A., Shumsky R. W., Hansen M., Odoni A., Gosling G. Safe at home? An experiment in domestic airline security. Oper. Res. (2001) 49:181–195Abstract, Google Scholar
• Butler V., Poole R. W. Rethinking checked-baggage screening. (2002) . Reason Public Policy Institute, Policy Study 297, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
• Chakrabarti S., Strauss A. Carnival booth: An algorithm for defeating the computer-aided passenger screening system. First Monday (2002) 7 http://www.firstmonday.orgCrossref, Google Scholar
• Derman C., Lieberman G. J., Ross S. M. A sequential stochastic assignment problem. Management Sci. (1972) 18(7):349–355Link, Google Scholar
• FAA, Federal Aviation AdministrationFAA Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2006–2017 (2006) (Office of Policy and Plans, Federal Aviation Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Garey M. R., Johnson D. S.Computers and Intractability. A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (1979) (W. H. Freeman and Co., New York) Google Scholar
• Hall M., DeLollis D. Plan to collect flier data canceled. USA Today (2004) July 14):1Google Scholar
• Hardy G. H., Littlewood J. E., Polya G.Inequalities (1952) 2nd ed.(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) Google Scholar
• Hilkevitch J. London airport offers security lessons for U.S.. Chicago Tribune (2003) February 17):1Google Scholar
• Jacobson S. H., Bowman J. M., Kobza J. E. Modeling and analyzing the performance of aviation security systems using baggage value performance measures. IMA J. Management Math. (2001) 12:3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson S. H., McLay L. A., Kobza J. E., Bowman J. M. Modeling and analyzing multiple station baggage screening security system performance. Naval Res. Logist. (2005a) 52(1):30–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson S. H., McLay L. A., Virta J. E., Kobza J. E. Integer program models for the deployment of airport baggage screening security devices. Optim. Engrg. (2005b) 6(3):339–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson S. H., Virta J. E., Bowman J. M., Kobza J. E., Nestor J. J. Modeling aviation baggage screening security systems: A case study. IIE Trans. (2003) 35:259–269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn E., Robinson R. Risk management analysis for U.S. commercial aviation security. Proc. 4th Internat. Aviation Security Tech. Sympos. (2006) (Safe Skies Publishing, Washington, D.C.) 91–96Google Scholar
• Kobza J. E., Jacobson S. H. Addressing the dependency problem in access security system architecture design. Risk Anal. (1996) 16(6):801–812Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kobza J. E., Jacobson S. H. Probability models for access security system architectures. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1997) 48(3):255–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martonosi S. An operations research approach to aviation security. (2005) . Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Martonosi S., Barnett A. I. How effective is security screening of airline passengers? Interfaces (2006) 36(6):545–552Link, Google Scholar
• McLay L. A. Designing aviation security systems: Theory and practice. (2006) . Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
• McLay L. A., Jacobson S. H. Integer knapsack problems with set-up weights. Computational Optim. Appl. (2007) 37(1):35–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLay L. A., Jacobson S. H., Kobza J. E. Making skies safer: Applying operations research to aviation passenger prescreening systems. OR/MS Today (2005) 32(5):24–31Google Scholar
• McLay L. A., Jacobson S. H., Kobza J. E. A multilevel passenger prescreening problem for aviation security. Naval Res. Logist. (2006) 53(3):183–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLay L. A., Jacobson S. H., Kobza J. E. Integer programming models and analysis for a multilevel passenger screening problem. IIE Trans. (2007) 39(1):73–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mead K. M. Key challenges facing the Transportation Security Administration. (2002) . Office of the Inspector General Report CC-2002-180, Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Mead K. M. Aviation security costs, Transportation Security Administration. (2003) . Office of the Inspector General Report CC-2003-066, Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Poole R. W., Passantino G. A risk-based airport security policy. (2003) . Reason Public Policy Institute, Policy Study 308, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
• Singel R. Life after death for CAPPS II? Wired News (2004) July 16). http://www.wired.comGoogle Scholar
• TSA U.S. Department of Homeland Security, TSA-Rev. (2004) . 8-23-2004. http://www.tsa.govGoogle Scholar
• TSA The National Archives and Records Administration File, FR Document 12405. (2005) . http://www.tsa.govGoogle Scholar
• Virta J. E., Jacobson S. H., Kobza J. E. Outgoing selectee rates at hub airports. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (2002) 76:155–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Virta J. E., Jacobson S. H., Kobza J. E. Analyzing the cost of screening selectee and non-selectee baggage. Risk Anal. (2003) 23:897–908Crossref, Google Scholar