A Dynamic Stochastic Model for the Single Airport Ground Holding Problem

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1070.0210

References

  • Andreatta G., Brunetta L., Guastalla G. From ground holding to free flight: An exact approach. Transportation Sci. (2000) 34:394–401LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ball M. O., Lulli G. Ground delay programs: Optimizing over an included flight set based on distance. Air Traffic Control Quart. (2004) 12:1–25Google Scholar
  • Ball M. O., Hoffman R., Lovell D. J., Mukherjee A. Response mechanisms for dynamic air traffic flow management. Proc. 6th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (2005) Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Ball M. O., Hoffman R., Odoni A. R., Rifkin R. A stochastic integer program with dual network structure and its application to the ground-holding problem. Oper. Res. (2003) 51:167–171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D., Patterson S. S. The air traffic flow management with enroute capacities. Oper. Res. (1998) 46:406–422LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chang K., Howard K., Oisen R., Shisler L., Tanino M., Wambsgnass M. Enhancements to the FAA ground delay programs under collaborative decision making. Interfaces (2001) 31:57–76LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Federal Aviation Administration Airport capacity benchmark report. (2004) . Report. http://www.faa.gov/events/benchmarks/Google Scholar
  • Hoffman R. Integer programming models for ground holding in air traffic flow management. (1997) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman R., Ball M. O. A comparison of formulations for the single-airport ground-holding problem with banking constraints. Oper. Res. (2000) 48:578–590LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman R., Ball M., Mukherjee A. Ration-by-distance with equity guarantees: A new approach to ground delay program planning and control. Proc. 7th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (2007) Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  • Kotnyek B., Richetta O. Equitable models for the stochastic ground-holding problem under collaborative decision making. Transportation Sci. (2006) 40:133–146LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu B., Hansen M., Mukherjee A. Scenario-based air traffic flow management: Developing and using capacity scenario trees. Transportation Res. Record (2006) 1951:113–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Odoni A. R., Odoni A. R., Bianco L., Szego G. The flow management problem in air traffic control. Flow Control of Congested Networks (1987) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 269–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Odoni A. R., Bianco L., Szego G. The flow management problem in air traffic control. Flow Control of Congested Networks (1987) (Spinger-Verlag, Berlin) 269–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richetta O., Odoni A. R. Solving optimally the static ground holding policy problem in air traffic control. Transportation Sci. (1993) 27:228–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Richetta O., Odoni A. R. Dynamic solution to the ground holding problem in air traffic control. Transportation Res. Part A (1994) 28:167–185Google Scholar
  • Vossen T., Ball M. O. Optimization and mediated bartering models for ground delay programs. Naval Res. Logist. (2006a) 51:75–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vossen T., Ball M. O. Slot trading opportunities in collaborative ground delay programs. Transportation Sci. (2006b) 40:29–43LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vossen T., Ball M. O., Hoffman R. A general approach to equity in traffic flow management and its application to mitigating exemption bias in ground delay programs. Proc. 5th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (2003) Budapest, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  • Vranas P., Bertsimas D., Odoni A. R. The multi-airport ground holding problem for air traffic control. Oper. Res. (1994) 42:249–261LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.