A Rolling Horizon Model to Optimize Aerodynamic Efficiency of Intermodal Freight Trains with Uncertainty

References

• Airflow ScienceAerodynamic Subroutine Version 4.0 (2006) (Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA)Manual for Railway Engineering, Chapter 16, Part 2, Train Performance (2001) (American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association, Landover, MD) Google Scholar
• Anderson F. Personal Communication. (2006) (BNSF Railway Company, Fort Worth, TX) Google Scholar
• Association of American Railroads (AAR)Loading Capabilities Guide (2004) (Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Association of American Railroads (AAR)Railroad Facts (2004–2006) (Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Avriel M., Penn M., Shpirer N., Witteboon S. Stowage planning for container ships to reduce the number of shifts. Ann. Oper. Res. (1998) 76:55–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• BNSF Railway Company Every drop counts in goal to improve fuel efficiency. BNSF News (2004a) (BNSF Railway Company, Fort Worth, TX) Google Scholar
• BNSF Railway CompanyIntermodal Loading Guide (2004b) (BNSF Railway Company, Fort Worth, TX) Google Scholar
• Brooke A., Kendrick D., Meeraus A., Raman R.GAMS—A User's Guide (1998) (GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Corry P. G., Kozan E. An assignment model for dynamic load planning of intermodal trains. Comput. Oper. Res. (2006) 33:1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drish W. F. Train Energy Model Version 2.0 Technical Manual. (1992) (Publication SD-485, Association of American Railroads, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Engdahl R. Full-Scale Rail Car Testing to Determine The Effect of Position-in-Train on Aerodynamic Resistance. (1987) (Publication SD-705, Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Engdahl R., Gielow R. L., Paul J. C. Train resistance—Aerodynamics Volume I of II intermodal car application. Proc. Railroad Energy Technology Conf. II (1987) (Association of American Railroads, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Engdahl R., Gielow R. L., Paul J. C. Train resistance—Aerodynamics Volume II of II open top car application. Proc. Railroad Energy Tech. Conf. II (1987) (Association of American Railroads, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Feo T. A., Gonzalez-Velrade J. L. The intermodal trailer assignment problem. Transportation Sci. (1995) 29:330–341Link, Google Scholar
• Furlong C. F. Aerodynamic Subroutine Users Guide. (1988) (Publication SD-683, Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Gallamore R. E. State of the art of intermodal freight transport in the United States. Intermodal Freight Transport in Europe and the United States (1998) (Eno Transportation Foundation, Inc., Lansdowne, VA) 17–31Chapter 2Google Scholar
• Gielow M. A., Furlong C. F.Results of Wind Tunnel and Full-Scale Tests Conducted from 1983 to 1987 in Support of The Association of American Railroad's Train Energy Program (1988) (Publication SD-685, Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Giemsch P., Jellinghaus A., Ahr D., Fahrion R., Oswald M., Reinelt G. Optimization models for the containership stowage problem. Operations Research Proceedings 2003 (2004) (Springer, Berlin) 347–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hay W. W.Railroad Engineering (1982) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Lai Y.-C., Barkan C. P. L. Options for improving the energy efficiency of intermodal freight trains. Transportation Res. Record 1916 (2005) 47–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai Y.-C., Barkan C. P. L., Önal H. Optimizing the aerodynamic efficiency of intermodal freight trains. Transportation Res. Part E (2008) 44(5):820–834doi:10.1016/j.tre.2007.05.011Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larsen A. The dynamic vehicle routing problem. (2001) . Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, LyngbyGoogle Scholar
• Lund K., Madsen O. B. G., Rygaard J. M.Vehicle Routing Problems with Varying Degrees of Dynamism (1998) . Technical report, Institute of Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, LyngbyGoogle Scholar
• Optimization Alternatives Ltd. Inc.Optimization Alternatives' Strategic Intermodal Scheduler (OASIS) (2005) . Retrieved September 1, 2007, http://www.oax.comGoogle Scholar
• Powell W. B., Carvalho T. A. Real-time optimization of containers and flatcars for intermodal operations. Transportation Sci. (1998) 32:110–126Link, Google Scholar
• Storm B. Personal Communication. (2005) (NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA) Google Scholar
• TTX CompanyEquipment Guide (1999) (TTX Company, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Union Pacific Railroad Corporation (UP)Intermodal Loading Guide, Union Pacific Railroad Corporation (2005) . Retrieved June 1, 2007, http://www.uprr.com/customers/dam-prev/attachments/intgenloadguide.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Utterback M. Personal communication. (2006) (BNSF Railway Company, Chicago) Google Scholar