Investigating Braess' Paradox with Time-Dependent Queues

References

• Akamatsu T., Heydecker B. Detecting dynamic traffic assignment capacity paradoxes in saturated networks. Transportation Sci. (2003) 37(2):127–138Link, Google Scholar
• Braess D. Uber ein Paradoxen der Verkehrsplaning. On a paradox of traffic planningUnternehmensforschung (1968) 12:258–268(Translated by: D. Braess, A. Nagurney, T. Wakolbinger. 2005. Transportation Sci. 39(4) 446–450.)Google Scholar
• Dafermos S., Nagurney A. On some traffic equilibrium theory paradoxes. Transportation Res. (1984) 18B:101–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daganzo C. F. Two paradoxes of traffic flow on networks with physical queues. Proc. II Sympos. Ingeneria Transportes (1996) 1May 22–24Madrid:55–62Google Scholar
• Daganzo C. F. Queue spillovers in transportation networks with a route choice. Transportation Sci. (1998) 32(1):3–11Link, Google Scholar
• Fisk C. More paradoxes in the equilibrium assignment problem. Transportation Res. (1979) 13B:305–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank M. The Braess paradox. Math. Programming (1981) 20:283–302Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gazis D. C.Traffic Theory (2002) (Kluwer Academic, Boston) Google Scholar
• Lin W., Lo H. K. Analysis of Braess' paradox with time-dependent queues. (2006) . Working paper, University of Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
• Newell G. F.Application of Queuing Theory (1982) 2nd ed.(Chapman and Hall, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver R. M., Samuel A. H. Reducing letter delays in post offices. Oper. Res. (1962) 10:839–892Link, Google Scholar
• Pas E. I., Principio S. L. Braess' paradox: Some new insights. Transportation Res. (1997) 31B:265–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinberg R., Stone R. E. The prevalence of paradoxes in transportation equilibrium problems. Transportation Sci. (1988) 22(4):301–318Link, Google Scholar
• Steinberg R., Zangwill W. I. The prevalence of Braess' paradox. Transportation Sci. (1983) 17(3):301–318Link, Google Scholar
• Wardrop J. G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc. Inst. Civil Engrg. (1952) 1:325–378Part IICrossref, Google Scholar
• Yang H., Bell M. G. H. A capacity paradox in network design and how to avoid it. Transportation Res. (1998) 32A:539–545Google Scholar