Dynamic Airline Scheduling

References

• Bandet P. O. Armada-hub: An adaption of AF fleet assignment model to take into account the hub structure in CDG. Proc. 34th AGIFORS Annual Sympos. (1994) Zandvoort, The Netherlands:387–392Google Scholar
• Barnhart C., Kniker T. S., Lohatepanont M. Itinerary-based airline fleet assignment. Transportation Sci. (2002) 36(2):199–217Link, Google Scholar
• Berge M. E., Hopperstad C. A. Demand driven dispatch: A method for dynamic aircraft capacity assignment, models and algorithms. Oper. Res. (1993) 41(1, Special Issue):153–168Link, Google Scholar
• Bish E. K., Suwandechochai R., Bish D. R. Strategies for managing the flexible capacity in the airline industry. Naval Res. Logist. (2004) 51:654–684Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler J., Sklarewitz N. Regional update—New airline routes and services, airport expansions, hotel upgrades and international services. Frequent Flyer (2004) December):12–15Google Scholar
• Desaulniers G., Desrosiers J., Rioux B., Solomon M., Soumis F. Daily aircraft routing and scheduling. Management Sci. (1997) 43:841–854Link, Google Scholar
• Donoghue J. A. Hub machine. Air Transport World (2002) 39(6):5Google Scholar
• Dror M., Trudeau P., Ladany S. P. Network models for seat allocation on flights. Transportation Res. (1988) 22B:239–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dumas J., Soumis F. Passenger flow model for airline networks. Transportation Sci. (2008) 42(2):197–207Link, Google Scholar
• Etschmaier M. M., Mathaisel D. F. X. Aircraft scheduling—the state of the art. Proc. 24th AGIFORS Annual Sympos. (1984) Strasbourg, France:181–225Google Scholar
• Farkas A. The influence of network effects and yield management on airline fleet assignment decisions. (1995) . Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Flottau J. Lufthansa reorganizes flight operations, “depeaks” Frankfurt. Aviation Daily (2003) November 13):3Google Scholar
• Gallego G., Phillips R. Revenue management of flexible products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2004) 6(4):1–17Link, Google Scholar
• Glover F., Glover R., Lorenzo J., McMillan C. The passenger-mix problem in the scheduled airlines. Interfaces (1982) 12(3):73–79Link, Google Scholar
• Hane C., Barnhart C., Johnson E., Marsten R., Nemhauser G., Sigismondi G. The fleet assignment problem: Solving a large-scale integer program. Math. Programming (1995) 70:211–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• ILOG ILOG CPLEX 9.0 User's Manual. (2003) . Mountain View, CAGoogle Scholar
• Jarrah A. I. An efficient airline refleeting model for the incremental modification of planned fleet assignment. Transportation Sci. (2000) 34(4):349–363Link, Google Scholar
• Jarrah A. I., Yu G., Krishnamurthy N., Rakshit A. A decision support framework for airline cancellations and delays. Transportation Sci. (1993) 27(3):266–280Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang H. Dynamic airline scheduling and robust airline schedule de-peaking. (2006) . Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Klabjan D., Johnson E. L., Nemhauser G. L., Gelman E., Ramaswamy S. Airline crew scheduling with time windows and plane-count constraints. Transportation Sci. (2002) 36(3):337–348Link, Google Scholar
• Kniker T. Itinerary-based fleet assignment. (1998) . Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Lan S., Clarke J.-P., Barnhart C. Planning for robust airline operations: Optimizing aircraft routings and flight departure times to minimize passenger disruptions. Transportation Sci. (2006) 40(1):15–28Link, Google Scholar
• Levin A. Scheduling and fleet routing models for transportation systems. Transportation Sci. (1971) 5(3):232–255Link, Google Scholar
• McDonald M. Endangered species? Air Transport World (2002) 39(6):34–38Google Scholar
• Ott J. “De-peaking” American hubs provides network benefit. Aviation Week Space Tech. (2003) 158(7):53–54Google Scholar
• Peterson R. M. The penultimate hub airplane. (1986) . Internal memo, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, SeattleGoogle Scholar
• Phillips B. L., Boyd D. W., Grossman T. A. An algorithm for calculating consistent itinerary flows. Transportation Sci. (1991) 25(3):225–239Link, Google Scholar
• Rexing B., Barnhart C., Kniker T., Jarrah A., Krishnamurthy N. Airline fleet assignment with time windows. Transportation Sci. (2000) 34(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenberger J. M., Schaefer A. J., Goldsman D., Johnson E. L. A stochastic model of airline operations. Transportation Sci. (2002) 36(4):357–377Link, Google Scholar
• Sherali H. D., Bish E. K., Zhu X. Polyhedral analysis and algorithms for a demand-driven refleeting model for aircraft assignment. Transportation Sci. (2005) 39(3):349–366Link, Google Scholar
• Soumis F., Ferland J., Rousseau J.-M. MAPUM: A model for assigning passengers to a flight schedule. Transportation Res., Part A (1981) 15A:155–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talluri K. Airline revenue management with passenger routing control: A new model with solution approaches. Internat. J. Services Tech. Management (2001) 2(1/2):102–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talluri K. T. Swapping applications in a daily airline fleet assignment. Transportation Sci. (1996) 30(3):237–248Link, Google Scholar
• Thengvall B. G., Bard J. F., Yu G. Balancing user preferences for aircraft schedule recovery during irregular operations. IIE Trans. (2000) 32:181–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• United Airlines UAL corporation reports fourth quarter and full year 2005 results. (2006) . Accessed January 27, http://www.united.com/press/detail/0,6862,53614-1,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Warburg V., Hanson T., Larsen A., Norman H., Anderson E.J. Air Transport Management (2008) 14(4):163–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu G., Luo S. On the airline schedule perturbation problem caused by the ground delay program. Transportation Sci. (1997) 31(4):298–311Link, Google Scholar