Ground Delay Program Planning Under Uncertainty Based on the Ration-by-Distance Principle

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1090.0289

References

  • Ahuja R. K., Magnanti T. L., Orlin J. B.Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications (1993) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Ball M. O., Lulli G. Ground delay programs: Optimizing over the included flight set based on distance. Air Traffic Control Quart. (2004) 12:1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball M. O., Dahl G., Vossen T. Matchings in connection with ground delay program planning. Networks (2007) 53:293–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball M. O., Vossen T., Hoffman R. Analysis of demand uncertainty in ground delay programs. Proc. 4th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (2001) Santa Fe, NM www.afm.seminar.orgGoogle Scholar
  • Ball M. O., Barnhart C., Nemhauser G., Odoni A. R., Barnhart C., Laporte G. Air transportation: Irregular operations and control. Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science: Transportation (2007) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 1–67Google Scholar
  • Ball M. O., Hoffman R., Odoni A., Rifkin R. A stochastic integer program with dual network structure and its application to the ground-holding problem. Oper. Res. (2003) 51:167–171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Birge J. R., Louveaux F.Introduction to Stochastic Programming (1998) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Federal Aviation Administration User's Guide for Real-Time FSA. (2007a) . Version 8.4, FAA SYS-TRN-001Google Scholar
  • Federal Aviation Administration Flight Schedule Monitor User's Guide. (2007b) . Version 8.8 Client, DCN 31F0308-009-RO. http://cdm.fly.faa.gov/Google Scholar
  • Hoffman R., Ball M. O., Mukherjee A. Ration-by-distance with equity guarantees: A new approach to ground delay program planning and control. Proc. 7th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (2007) Barcelona, Spain www.afm.seminar.orgGoogle Scholar
  • Inniss T., Ball M. O. Estimating one-parameter airport arrival capacity distributions for air traffic flow management. Air Traffic Control Quart. (2004) 12:223–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotnyek B., Richetta O. Equitable models for the stochastic ground holding problem under collaborative decision making. Transportation Sci. (2006) 40:133–146LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu P., Hansen M. Scenario-free sequential decision model for the single airport ground holding problem. Proc. 7th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (2007) Barcelona, Spain www.afm.seminar.orgGoogle Scholar
  • Liu P., Hansen M., Mukherjee A. Scenario-based air traffic flow management: From theory to practice. Transportation Res. Record (2006) 1951:113–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mukherjee A., Hansen M. A dynamic stochastic model for a single airport ground-holding problem. Transportation Sci. (2007) 41:444–456LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Odoni A. R., Odoni A. R., Bianco L., Szego G. The flow management problem in air traffic control. Flow Control of Congested Networks (1987) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 269–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richetta O., Odoni A. R. Solving optimally the static ground-holding problem in air traffic control. Transportation Sci. (1993) 27:228–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Richetta O., Odoni A. R. Dynamic solution to the ground holding problem in air traffic control. Transportation Res. (1994) 28A:167–185Google Scholar
  • Terrab M., Odoni A. R. Strategic flow management for air traffic control. Oper. Res. (1993) 41:138–152LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vossen T., Ball M. O. Optimization and mediated bartering models for ground delay programs. Naval Res. Logist. (2006a) 53:75–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vossen T., Ball M. O. Slot trading opportunities in collaborative ground delay programs. Transportation Sci. (2006b) 40:29–43LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vossen T., Ball M. O., Hoffman R., Wambsganss M. A general approach to equity in traffic flow management and its application to mitigating exemption bias in ground delay programs. Air Traffic Control Quart. (2003) 11:277–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wambsganss M. Collaborative decision making through dynamic information transfer. Air Traffic Control Quart. (1996) 4:107–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willemain T. R. Contingencies and cancellations in ground delay programs. Air Traffic Control Quart. (2002) 10:43–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson F. W. A stochastic air traffic management model that incorporates probabilistic forecasts. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. Interactive Inform. Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology (2004) . http://www.ametsoc.org.meetGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.