Wardrop Equilibria with Risk-Averse Users

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1090.0292

References

  • Aashtiani H. Z., Magnanti T. L. Equilibria on a congested transportation network. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods (1981) 2(3):213–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aghassi M., Bertsimas D. Robust game theory. Math. Programming (2006) 107B:231–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Altman E., Boulogne T., El-Azouzi R., Jiménez T., Wynter L. A survey on networking games in telecommunications. Comp. Oper. Res. (2006) 33(2):286–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreatta G., Romeo L. Stochastic shortest paths with recourse. Networks (1988) 18:193–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashlagi I., Monderer D., Tennenholtz M. Resource selection games with unknown number of players. Proc. Fifth Internat. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems (2006) (ACM, New York) 819–825CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A., Zhang M. Two-stage robust network flow and design under demand uncertainty. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(4):662–673LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bar-Gera H. Transportation network test problems. (2002) . Accessed November 2009, http://www.bgu.ac.il/∼bargera/tntp/Google Scholar
  • Beckmann M. J., McGuire C. B., Winsten C. B.Studies in the Economics of Transportation (1956) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Bell M. G. H., Cassir C. Risk-averse user equilibrium traffic assignment: An application of game theory. Transportation Res. (2002) 36B(8):671–681CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. Robust truss topology design via semidefinite programming. SIAM J. Optim. (1997) 7(4):991–1016CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. Robust convex optimization. Math. Oper. Res. (1998) 23(4):769–805LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A., Golany B., Nemirovski A., Vial J.-P. Supplier-retailer flexible commitments contracts: A robust optimization approach. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(3):248–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bergendorff P., Hearn D. W., Ramana M. V., Pardalos P. M., Hearn D. W., Hager W. W. Congestion toll pricing of traffic networks. Network Optimization, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (1997) 450(Springer, Berlin) 51–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P., Tsitsiklis J. N. An analysis of stochastic shortest path problems. Math. Oper. Res. (1991) 16(3):580–595LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D., Sim M. Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Math. Programming Ser. B (2003) 98:49–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D., Thiele A., Bienstock D., Nemhauser G. A robust optimization approach to supply chain management. Proc. 10th Internat. Integer Programming Combin. Optim. Conf. (2004) 3064(Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg) 86–100IT Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D., Thiele A. A robust optimization approach to inventory theory. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(1):150–168LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Braess D. Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung (1968) 12:258–268[English translation: Braess, D., A. Nagurney, T. Wakolginger. 2005. On a paradox of traffic planning. Transportation Sci. 39(4) 446–450]Google Scholar
  • Bureau of Public Roads Traffic assignment manual. (1964) . U.S. Department of Commerce, Urban Planning Division, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos S. C. Traffic equilibrium and variational inequalities. Transportation Sci. (1980) 14(1):42–54LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo C., Sheffi Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transportation Sci. (1977) 11(3):253–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Palma A., Nesterov Y. Optimization formulations and static equilibrium in congested transportation networks. (1998) . CORE Discussion Paper 9861, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  • de Palma A., Picard N. Route choice decision under travel time uncertainty. Transportation Res. (2005) 39A(4):295–324Google Scholar
  • Dial R. B. A probabilistic multi-path traffic assignment algorithm which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Res. (1971) 5(2):83–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • El-Ghaoui L., Lebret H. Robust solutions to least-square problems to uncertain data matrices. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. (1997) 18:1035–1064CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • El-Ghaoui L., Oks M., Oustry F. Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: A conic programming approach. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(4):543–556LinkGoogle Scholar
  • El-Ghaoui L., Oustry F., Lebret H. Robust solutions to uncertain semidefinite programs. SIAM J. Optim. (1998) 9(1):33–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan Y. Y., Kalaba R. E., Moore J. E. Arriving on time. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (2005a) 127(3):497–513CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan Y. Y., Kalaba R. E., Moore J. E. Shortest paths in stochastic networks with correlated link costs. Comput. Math. Appl. (2005b) 49:1549–1564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris M. C., Mangasarian O. L., Pang J. S.Complementarity: Applications, Algorithms and Extensions, Vol. 50, Applied Optimization (2001) (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischer L., Jain K., Mahdian M. Tolls for heterogeneous selfish users in multicommodity networks and generalized congestion games. Proc. 45th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (2004) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA) 277–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fourer R., Gay D. M., Kernighan B. W.AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming (2002) (Brooks/Cole, Pacific Groove, CA) Google Scholar
  • Gabriel S., Bernstein D. The traffic equilibrium problem with nonadditive path costs. Transportation Sci. (1997) 31:337–348LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb D., Iyengar G. Robust portfolio selection problems. Math. Oper. Res. (2003) 28(1):1–38LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J. C. Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, I–III. Part I. The basic model. Management Sci. (1967) 14(3):159–182LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J. C. Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, I–III. Part II. Bayesian equilibrium points. Management Sci. (1968) 14(5):320–334LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hayashi S., Yamashita N., Fukushima M. Robust Nash equilibria and second-order cone complementarity problems. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. (2005) 6:283–296Google Scholar
  • Holmström B., Myerson R. B. Efficient and durable decision rules with incomplete information. Econometrica (1983) 51:1799–1820CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ILOG CPLEX. (2005) . http://www.ilog.comGoogle Scholar
  • Jahn O., Möhring R. H., Schulz A. S., Stier-Moses N. E. System-optimal routing of traffic flows with user constraints in networks with congestion. Oper. Res. (2005) 53(4):600–616LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu H., Ban X., Ran B., Mirchandani P. An analytical dynamic traffic assignment model with stochastic network and travelers' perceptions. Transportation Res. Record (2002) 1783:125–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lo H. K., Tung Y.-K. Network with degradable links: Capacity analysis and design. Transportation Res. (2003) 37B(4):345–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcotte P., Zhu D. L. Existence and computation of optimal tolls in multiclass network equilibrium problems. Oper. Res. Lett. (2009) 37:211–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mirchandani P. B., Soroush H. Generalized traffic equilibrium with probabilistic travel times and perceptions. Transportation Sci. (1987) 21:133–152LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nagurney A.Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach (1999) 2nd ed.(Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nie Y., Wu X. Shortest path problem considering on-time arrival probability. Transportation Res. (2009) 43B:597–613CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nikolova E., Brand M., Karger D. R. Optimal route planning under uncertainty. Proc. Internat. Conf. Automated Planning Scheduling (2006) Cumbria, UK:131–141Google Scholar
  • Noland R. B., Small K., Koskenoja P., Chu X. Simulating travel reliability. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. (1998) 28(5):535–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ordóñez F., Stier-Moses N. E. Robust wardrop equilibrium. Proc. First Inter. Conf. Network Control Optim. (2007a) 4465(Springer, Berlin) 247–256Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ordóñez F., Zhao J. Robust capacity expansion of network flows. Networks (2007b) 50(2):136–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patriksson M.The Traffic Assignment Problem: Models and Methods (1994) (VSP, Utrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Roughgarden T. How unfair is optimal routing? Proc. 13th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2002) (SIAM, Philadelphia) 203–204Google Scholar
  • Roughgarden T., Tardos É. How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM (2002) 49:236–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheffi Y.Urban Transportation Networks (1985) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Smith M. J. The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria. Transportation Res. (1979) 13B:295–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uchida T., Iida Y., Daganzo C. F. Risk assignment: A new traffic assignment model considering risk of travel time variation. Proc. 12th Internat. Sympos. Transportation Traffic Theory (1993) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 89–105Google Scholar
  • Ukkusuri S. V., Waller S. T. Approximate expressions for network performance under demand uncertainty. Transportation Lett. (2010) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vanderbei R. J. LOQO: An interior point code for quadratic programming. Optim. Methods Software (1999) 12:451–484CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wardrop J. G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc. Institute of Civil Engineers, Part II (1952) 1:325–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H., Huang H.-J. The multi-class, multi-criteria traffic network equilibrium and systems optimum problem. Transportation Res. (2004) 38B:1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.