Sequencing Two Cooperating Automated Stacking Cranes in a Container Terminal

References

• Bozer Y. A., Carlo H. J. Optimizing inbound and outbound door assignments in less-than-truckload crossdocks. IIE Trans. (2008) 40(11):1007–1018Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlo H. J., Vis I. F. A., Ellis K., Meller R., Ogle M. K., Peters B. A., Taylor G. D., Usher J. S. Routing new types of stacking crane configurations at container terminals. Progress in Material Handling Research (2008) (Material Handling Institute, Charlotte, NC) 55–70Google Scholar
• Franke K. P. Time and motion: Proof that strads work. Cargo Systems (2004) 7:49–51Google Scholar
• Goodchild A. V., Daganzo C. F. Double-cycling strategies for container ships and their effect on ship loading and unloading operations. Transportation Sci. (2006) 40(4):473–483Link, Google Scholar
• Han M. H., McGinnis L. F., Shieh J. S., White J. A. On sequencing retrievals in an automated storage/retrieval system. IIE Trans. (1987) 19(1):56–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonker R., Volgenant A. A shortest augmenting path algorithm for dense and sparse linear assignment problems. Computing (1987) 38:325–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung A. The box that makes the world go round. (2005) . Spiegel Online International, accessed March 26, 2009, http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,386799,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Kim K. H. Evaluation of the number of rehandles in container yards. Comput. Indust. Engrg. (1997) 32(4):701–711Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K. H., Kim K. Y. An optimal routing algorithm for a transfer crane in port container terminals. Transportation Sci. (1999) 33(1):17–33Link, Google Scholar
• Kim K. H., Lee K. M., Hwang H. Sequencing delivery and receiving operations for yard cranes in port container terminals. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2003) 84:283–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C. D., Vecchi M. P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science (1983) 220(4598):671–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meller R. D., Bozer Y. A. A new simulated annealing algorithm for the facility layout problem. Internat. J. Production Res. (1996) 34(6):1675–1692Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murty K. G., Wan Y.-W., Liu J., Tseng M. M., Leung E. L., Lai K.-k., Chiu H. W. C. HongKong international terminals gains elastic capacity using a data-intensive decision-support system. Interfaces (2005) 35(1):61–75Link, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan A., Palekar U. S. Analysis and algorithms for the transtainer routing problem in container port operations. Transportation Sci. (2002) 36(1):63–78Link, Google Scholar
• Saanen Y. Automated container handling. (2008) . Accessed June 26, 2008, http://www.freight-int.com/categories/automated-container-handling/automated-container-handling.aspGoogle Scholar
• Saanen Y. A., Valkengoed M. V., Kuhl M. E., Steiger N., Armstrong F. B., Joines J. A. Comparison of three automated stacking alternatives by means of simulation. Proc. 2005 Winter Simulation Conf. (2005) Baltimore:1567–1576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taggart S. The 20-Ton packet. Wired Magazine (1999) 7:10Google Scholar
• Tompkins J. A., White J. A., Bozer Y. A., Tanchoco J. M. A.Facilities Planning (2003) 3rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons)351–357Google Scholar
• UNCTADReview of Maritime Transport 2008 (2008) (United Nations, New York) Google Scholar
• UNESCAP Regional shipping and port development strategies. (2008) . Report, accessed June 26, 2008, http://www.unescap.org/ttdw/Publications/TFS_pubs/pub_2153.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Vis I. F. A. A comparative analysis of storage and retrieval equipment at a container terminal. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2006) 103:680–693Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vis I. F. A., Koster R. D. Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 147(1):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vis I. F. A., Roodbergen K. J. Scheduling of container storage and retrieval. Oper. Res. (2009) 57:456–467Link, Google Scholar
• Wilhelm M. R., Ward T. L. Solving quadratic assignment problems by “simulated annealing”. IIE Trans. (1987) 19(1):107–119Crossref, Google Scholar