Train Schedule Coordination at an Interchange Station Through Agent Negotiation

References

• Bazaraa M. S., Sherali H. D., Shetty C. M.Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms (1993) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Böcker J., Lind J., Zirkler B. Using a multi-agent approach to optimise the train coupling and sharing system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 131:242–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyer K. D.Principles of Transportation Economics (1998) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Brucker P., Burkard R. E., Hurink J. Cyclic schedules for r irregularly occurring events. J. Computat. Appl. Math. (1990) 30:173–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics (BTRE)Rail Infrastructure Pricing: Principles and Practice (2003) (BTRE, Canberra, Australia) Google Scholar
• Burkard R. E. Optimal schedules for periodically recurring events. Discrete Appl. Math. (1986) 15:167–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehtamo H., Verkama M., Hamalainen R. P. On distributed computation of Pareto solutions for two decision makers. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics Part A: Systems Humans (1996) 26:498–503Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC) Rail transport and interoperability: Overview. (2006) . Accessed March 15, 2006, http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/rail/index_en.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Jennings N. R., Bussmann S. Agent-based control systems: Why are they suited to engineering complex systems? IEEE Control Systems Magazine (2003) 23:61–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulley C., Nelson J. D. Interoperability and transport policy: The impediments to interoperability in the organisation of trans-European transport systems. J. Transport Geography (1997) 7:93–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murata S., Goodman C. J. Optimally regulating disturbed metro traffic with passenger inconvenience in mind. Proc. Internat. Conf. Developments in Mass Transit Systems (1998) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 86–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nachtigall K. Periodic network optimization with different arc frequencies. Discrete Appl. Math. (1996) 69:1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nachtigall K., Voget S. A genetic algorithm approach to periodic railway synchronization. Comput. Oper. Res. (1996) 23:453–463Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teodorović D. Transport modeling by multi-agent systems: A swarm intelligence approach. Transportation Planning Tech. (2003) 26:289–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang C. W., Ho T. K. A prioritised fuzzy constraint satisfaction approach to model agent negotiation for railway scheduling. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. Cybernetics (2004) Shanghai, China:1795–1801 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1382067Google Scholar
• Tsang C. W., Ho T. K. Conflict resolution through negotiation in railway open access market—A multi-agent system approach. Transportation Planning Tech. (2006a) 29:157–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang C. W., Ho T. K. Schedule coordination through negotiation between train service providers in an open railway access market. Proc. 2006 IEEE Internat. Conf. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2006b) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 884–889Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang C. W., Ho T. K. Optimal track access rights allocation for agent negotiation in an open railway market. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems (2008) 9:62–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang H. S., Zhang Y., Li Z. H., Hu D. C. Spatial-temporal traffic data analysis based on global data management using MAS. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems (2004) 5:267–275Crossref, Google Scholar