Incorporating Mental Representations in Discrete Choice Models of Travel Behavior: Modeling Approach and Empirical Application

References

• Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP (2009) A need-based model of multi-day, multi-person activity generation. Transportation Res. Part B 43(2):251–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arentze TA, Dellaert BGC, Timmermans HJP (2008) Modeling and measuring individuals' mental representations of complex spatio-temporal decision problems. Environment Behav. 40(6):843–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arentze TA, Ettema D, Timmermans HJP (2011) Estimating a model of dynamic activity generation based on one-day observations: Method and results. Transportation Res. Part B 45:447–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bara BG, Bucciarelli M, Lombardo V (2001) Model theory of deduction: A unified computational approach. Cognitive Sci. 25(6):839–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrouillet P, Lecas J-F (1998) How can mental models theory account for content effects in conditional reasoning? A developmental perspective. Cognition 67(3):209–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M, McFadden D, Train K, Walker J, Bhat C, Bierlaire M, Bolduc Det al. (2002) Hybrid choice models: Progress and challenges. Marketing Lett. 13(3):163–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolduc D, Boucher N, Alvarez-Daziano R (2009) Hybrid choice modeling of new technologies for car choice in Canada. Transportation Res. Record 2082:63–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chorus CG, Timmermans HJP (2008) Revealing consumer preferences by observing information search. J. Choice Model. 1:3–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellaert BGC, Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP (2008) Shopping context and consumers' mental representation of complex shopping trip decision problems. J. Retailing 84:219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eder AB, Hommel B, de Houwer J (2007) How distinctive is affective processing? On the implications of using cognitive paradigms to study affect and emotion. Cognition Emotion 21:1137–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbride TJ, Allenby GM, Brazell JD (2006) Models for heterogeneous variable selection. J. Marketing Res. 43:420–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH, Hensher DA, Rose J (2006) Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models. Transportation Res. Part B 40:75–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagerty MR, Aaker DA (1984) A normative model of consumer information processing. Marketing Sci. 3(3):227–246.Link, Google Scholar
• Hensher DA, Rose J, Greene WH (2005) Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horeni O, Arentze TA, Dellaert BGC, Timmermans HJP (2014) Online measurement of mental representations of complex spatial decision problems: Comparison of CNET and hard laddering. Transportation Res. Part F 22(1):170–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental Models (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird PN, Byrne RMJ (1991) Deduction (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kusumastuti D, Hannes E, Janssens D, Wets G, Dellaert BGC (2010) Scrutinizing individuals' leisure-shopping travel decisions to appraise activity-based models of travel demand. Transportation 4:647–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers JH (1976) Benefit structure analysis: A new tool for product planning. J. Marketing 40(4):23–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijland L, Arentze T, Timmermans H (2010) Eliciting needs underlying activity-travel patterns and their covariance structure: Results of multi-method analyses. Proc. 89th Annual Meeting Transportation Res. Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Prato GG, Bekhor S, Pronello C (2013) Latent variables and route choice behavior. Transportation 39(2):299–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratneshwar S, Warlop L, Mick DG, Seeger G (1997) Benefit salience and consumers' selective attention to product features. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 14:245–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava RK, Leone RP, Shocker AD (1981) Market structure analysis: Hierarchical clustering of products based on substitution-in-use. J. Marketing 45(3):38–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ter Hofstede F, Audenaert A, Steenkamp J-BEM, Wedel M (1998) An investigation into the association pattern technique as a quantitative approach to measuring means-end analysis. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 15(1):37–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train K (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Kenhove P, de Wulf K, van Waterschoot W (1999) The impact of task definition on store-attribute saliences and store choice. J. Retailing 75(1):125–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Johnson EJ (2006) Constructing preferences from memory. Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, eds. The Construction of Preference (Cambridge University Press, New York), 397–410.Crossref, Google Scholar