A Game-Theoretic Approach for Regulating Hazmat Transportation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0592

References

  • Akgün V, Erkut E, Batta R (2000) On finding dissimilar paths. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 121(2):232–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bianco L, Caramia M, Giordani S (2009) A bilevel flow model for hazmat transportation network design. Transportation Res. Part C 17(2):175–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caramia M, Giordani S (2009) On the selection of k efficient paths by clustering techniques. Internat. J. Data Mining, Modelling Management 1(3):237–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caramia M, Giordani S, Iovanella A (2010) On the selection of k routes in multi-objective hazmat route planning. IMA J. Management Math. 21(3):239–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carotenuto P, Giordani S, Ricciardelli S (2007) Finding minimum and equitable risk routes for hazmat shipments. Comput. Oper. Res. 34(5):1304–1327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G (2005) Bilevel programming: A survey. 4OR 3(2):87–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G (2007) An overview of bilevel optimization. Ann. Oper. Res. 153(1):235–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dell’Olmo P, Gentili M, Scozzari A (2005) On finding dissimilar Pareto-optimal paths. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 162(1):70–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dempe S (2003) Annotated bibliography on bilevel programming and mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Optimization 52(3):333–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dempe S (2005) Bilevel programming. Audet C, Hansen P, Savard G, eds. Essays and Surveys in Global Optimization (Springer-Verlag, New York), 165–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erkut E, Alp O (2007) Designing a road network for dangerous goods shipments. Comput. Oper. Res. 34(5):1389–1405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erkut E, Gzara F (2008) Solving the hazmat transport network design problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 35(7):2234–2247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erkut E, Tjandra S, Verter V (2007) Hazardous materials transportation. Barnhart C, Laporte G, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Transportation, Vol. 14 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 539–621.Google Scholar
  • Gopalan R, Kolluri KS, Batta R, Karwan MH (1990) Modeling equity of risk in the transportation of hazardous materials. Oper. Res. 38(6):961–975.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hearn DW, Ramana MV (1998) Solving congestion toll pricing models. Marcotte P, Nguyen S, eds. Equilibrium and Advanced Transportation Modeling (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 109–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu TC, Kahng AB, Tsao CW (1995) Old bachelor acceptance: A new class of non-monotone threshold accepting methods. ORSA J. Comput. 7(4):417–425.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kara BY, Verter V (2004) Designing a road network for hazardous materials transportation. Transportation Sci. 38(2):188–196.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lindner-Dutton L, Batta R, Karwan MH (1991) Equitable sequencing of a given set of hazardous materials shipments. Transportation Sci. 25(2):124–137.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luo Z-Q, Pang J-S, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machuca E, Mandow L, Perez de la Cruz JL, Iovanella A (2011) Heuristic multiobjective search for hazmat transportation problems. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Vol. 7023 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg), 243–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcotte P (1987) Algorithms for the network oligopoly problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 38(11):1051–1065.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcotte P, Mercier A, Savard G, Verter V (2009) Toll policies for mitigating hazardous materials transport risk. Transportation Sci. 43(2):228–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marianov V, ReVelle C (1998) Linear non-approximated models for optimal routing in hazardous environments. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49(2):157–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monderer D, Shapley LS (1996) Potential games. Games Econom. Behav. 14(1):124–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roch S, Savard G, Marcotte P (2005) An approximation algorithm for Stackelberg network pricing. Networks 46(1):57–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali HD, Soyster AL, Murphy FH (1983) Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot equilibria: Characterization and computations. Oper. Res. 31(2):253–276.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Verter V, Kara BY (2008) A path-based approach for the hazardous network design problem. Management Sci. 54(1):29–40.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J, Kang Y, Kwon C, Batta R (2012) Dual toll pricing for hazardous materials transport with linear delay. Networks Spatial Econom. 12(1):147–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zografos K, Davis C (1989) Multi-objective programming approach for routing hazardous materials. J. Transportation Engrg. 115(6):661–673.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.