Day-to-Day Flow Dynamics and Congestion Control

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0596

References

  • Beckmann MJ (1965) On optimal tolls for highways, tunnels and bridges. Edie LC, Herman R, Rothery R, eds. Vehicular Traffic Science (Elsevier, New York), 331–341.Google Scholar
  • Bertsekas DP (2003) Nonlinear Programming (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA).Google Scholar
  • Cantarella GE, Cascetta E (1995) Dynamic processes and equilibrium in transportation networks: Towards a unifying theory. Transportation Sci. 29(4):305–329.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos SC (1973) Toll patterns for multiclass-user transportation networks. Transportation Sci. 7(3):211–223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Friesz TL, Bernstein D, Kydes N (2004) Dynamic congestion pricing in disequilibrium. Networks Spatial Econom. 4(2):181–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friesz TL, Mookherjee R, Yao T (2008) Securitizing congestion: The congestion call option. Transportation Res. Part B 42(5):407–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friesz TL, Bernstein DH, Mehta NJ, Tobin RL, Ganjalizadeh S (1994) Day-to-day dynamic network disequilibrium and idealized traveler information systems. Oper. Res. 42(6):1120–1136.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia A, Hong M, Barrera J (2012) “Cap and trade” for congestion control. Dynam. Games Appl. 2(3):280–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goddard HC (1997) Using tradable permits to achieve sustainability in the world’s large cities: Policy design issues and efficiency conditions for controlling vehicle emissions, congestion and urban decentralization with an application to Mexico City. Environ. Resource Econom. 10(1):63–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo RY, Huang HJ (2009) Chaos and bifurcation in dynamical evolution process of traffic assignment with flow “mutation.” Chaos, Solitons Fractals 41(3):1150–1157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo RY, Yang H, Huang HJ (2013) A discrete rational adjustment process of link flows in traffic networks. Transportation Res. Part C 34:121–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo RY, Yang H, Huang HJ, Tan Z (2015) Link-based day-to-day network traffic dynamics and equilibria. Transportation Res. Part B 71:248–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo X (2013) Toll sequence operation to realize target flow pattern under bounded rationality. Transportation Res. Part B 56:203–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Han D, Yang H (2009) Congestion pricing in the absence of demand functions. Transportation Res. Part E 45(1):159–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Han D, Yang H, Wang XL (2010) Efficiency of the plate-number-based traffic rationing in general networks. Transportation Res. Part E 46(6):1095–1110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Han L, Du L (2012) On a link-based day-to-day traffic assignment model. Transportation Res. Part B 46(1):72–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He F, Yin YF, Shirmohammadi N, Nie Y (2013) Tradable credit schemes on networks with mixed equilibrium behaviors. Transportation Res. Part B 57:47–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He X, Liu HX (2012) Modeling the day-to-day traffic evolution process after an unexpected network disruption. Transportation Res. Part B 46(1):50–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He X, Guo X, Liu HX (2010) A link-based day-to-day traffic assignment model. Transportation Res. Part B 44(4):597–608.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hearn DW (1980) Bounding flows in traffic assignment models. Research report 80-4, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  • Hearn DW, Ramana MV (1998) Solving congestion toll pricing models. Marcotte P, Nguyen S, eds. Equilibrium and Advanced Transportation Modeling (Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York), 109–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horowitz JL (1984) The stability of stochastic equilibrium in a two link transportation network. Transportation Res. Part B 18(1):13–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang HJ, Lam WHK (2002) Modeling and solving the dynamic user equilibrium route and departure time choice problem in network with queues. Transportation Res. Part B 36(3):253–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin WL (2007) A dynamical system model of the traffic assignment problem. Transportation Res. Part B 41(1):32–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson T, Patriksson M (1995) An augmented Lagrangean dual algorithm for link capacity constrained traffic assignment problems. Transportation Res. Part B 29(6):433–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson T, Patriksson M (1998) Side constrained traffic equilibrium models—Traffic management through link tolls. Marcotte P, Nguyen S, eds. Equilibrium and Advanced Transportation Modelling (Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York), 125–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson T, Patriksson M (1999) Side constrained traffic equilibrium models—Analysis, computation and applications. Transportation Res. Part B 33(4):233–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawphongpanich S, Hearn DW, Smith MJ (2006) Mathematical and Computational Models for Congestion Charging (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luenberger DG (1995) Microeconomic Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Luenberger DG, Ye Y (2008) Linear and Nonlinear Programming (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagurney A, Zhang D (1995) Projected Dynamical Systems and Variational Inequalities with Applications (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Google Scholar
  • Nagurney A, Zhang D (1997) Projected dynamical systems in the formulation, stability analysis, and computation of fixed-demand traffic network equilibria. Transportation Sci. 31(2):147–158.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nguyen S, Dupius C (1984) An efficient method for computing traffic equilibria in networks with asymmetric transportation costs. Transportation Sci. 18(2):185–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nie Y (2012) Transaction costs and tradable mobility credits. Transportation Res. Part B 46(1):189–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nie Y, Yin Y (2013) Managing rush hour travel choices with tradable credit scheme. Transportation Res. Part B 50:1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peeta S, Yang TH (2003) Stability issues for dynamic traffic assignment. Automatica 39(1):21–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pigou AC (1920) The Economics of Welfare (MacMillan, London).Google Scholar
  • Raux C (2004) The use of transferable permits in transport policy. Transportation Res. Part D 9(3):185–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raux C, Mariot G (2005) A system of tradable CO2 permits applied to fuel consumption by motorists. Transport Policy 12(3):255–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholm WH (2001) Potential games with continuous player sets. J. Econom. Theory 97(1):81–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholm WH (2002) Evolutionary implementation and congestion pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(3):667–689.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheffi Y (1985) Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Smith M, Mounce R (2011) A splitting rate model of traffic re-routing and traffic control. Transportation Res. Part B 45(9):1389–1409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith MJ (1979) The marginal cost taxation of a transportation network. Transportation Res. Part B 13(3):237–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith MJ (1983) The existence and calculation of traffic equilibria. Transportation Res. Part B 17(4):291–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith MJ (1984) The stability of a dynamic model of traffic assignment—An application of a method of Lyapunov. Transportation Sci. 18(3):259–304.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith MJ, Wisten MB (1995) A continuous day-to-day traffic assignment model and the existence of a continuous dynamic user equilibrium. Ann. Oper. Res. 60(1):59–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teodorović D, Triantis K, Edara P, Zhao Y, Mladenović S (2008) Auction-based congestion pricing. Transportation Planning Tech. 31(4):399–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trench WF (2003) Introduction to Real Analysis (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Verhoef E, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (1997) Tradable permits: Their potential in the regulation of road transport externalities. Environment Planning B 24(4):527–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vickrey WS (1969) Congestion theory and transport investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 59(2):251–260.Google Scholar
  • Viegas JM (2001) Making urban road pricing acceptable and effective: Searching for quality and equity in urban mobility. Transport Policy 8(4):289–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walters AA (1961) The theory and measurement of private and social cost of highway congestion. Econometrica 29(4):676–699.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang X, Yang H (2012) Bisection-based trial-and-error implementation of marginal cost pricing and tradable credit schemes. Transportation Res. Part B 46(9):1085–1096.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang X, Yang H, Zhu D, Li C (2012) Tradable travel credits for congestion management with heterogeneous users. Transportation Res. Part E 48(2):426–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watling D (1999) Stability of the stochastic equilibrium assignment problem: A dynamical systems approach. Transportation Res. Part B 33(4):281–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watling D, Hazelton ML (2003) The dynamics and equilibria of day-to-day assignment models. Networks Spatial Econom. 3(3):349–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu D, Yin Y, Lawphongpanich S, Yang H (2012) Design of more equitable congestion pricing and tradable credit schemes for multimodal transportation networks. Transportation Res. Part B 46(9):1273–1287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao F, Qian Z, Zhang HM (2013) Managing bottleneck congestion with tradable credits. Transportation Res. Part B 58:1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang F (2005) An evolutionary game theory approach to the day-to-day traffic dynamics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison.Google Scholar
  • Yang F, Zhang D (2009) Day-to-day stationary link flow pattern. Transportation Res. Part B 43(1):119–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang F, Yin Y, Lu J (2007) Steepest descent day-to-day dynamic toll. Transportation Res. Record 2039:83–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H (1999) System optimum, stochastic user equilibrium and optimal link tolls. Transportation Sci. 33(4):354–360.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H, Bell MGH (1997) Traffic restraint, road pricing and network equilibrium. Transportation Res. Part B 31(4):303–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H, Huang HJ (2004) The multi-class, multi-criteria traffic network equilibrium and systems optimum problem. Transportation Res. Part B 38(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H, Huang HJ (2005) Mathematical and Economic Theory of Road Pricing (Elsevier, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H, Wang X (2011) Managing network mobility with tradable credits. Transportation Res. Part B 45(3):580–594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H, Meng Q, Lee DH (2004) Trial-and-error implementation of marginal-cost pricing on networks in the absence of demand functions. Transportation Res. Part B 38(6):477–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang H, Xu W, He BS, Meng Q (2010) Road pricing for congestion control with unknown demand and cost functions. Transportation Res. Part C 18(2):157–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ye H, Yang H (2013) Continuous price and flow dynamics of tradable mobility credits. Transportation Res. Part B 57:436–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yildirim MB, Hearn DW (2005) A first best toll pricing framework for variable demand traffic assignment problems. Transportation Res. Part B 39(8):659–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang D, Nagurney A (1996) On the local and global stability of a travel route choice adjustment process. Transportation Res. Part B 30(4):245–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang D, Nagurney A, Wu J (2001) On the equivalence between stationary link flow patterns and traffic network equilibria. Transportation Res. Part B 35(8):731–748.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X, Yang H, Huang HJ (2011) Improving travel efficiency by parking permits distribution and trading. Transportation Res. Part B 45(7):1018–1034.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu DL, Yang H, Li CM, Wang XL (2015) Properties of the multiclass traffic network equilibria under a tradable credit scheme. Transportation Sci. 49(3):519–534.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.