Vehicle Longitudinal Control and Traffic Stream Modeling

References

• Banks JH (1989) Freeway speed-flow-concentration relationships: More evidence and interpretations. Transportation Res. Record 1225:53–60.Google Scholar
• Chandler R, Herman R, Montroll E (1958) Traffic dynamics: Studies in car following. Oper. Res. 6(2):165–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Daganzo C (1994) The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 28(4):269–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Del Castillo JM (2012) Three new models for the flow-density relationship: Derivation and testing for freeway and urban data. Transportmetrica 8(6):443–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Del Castillo JM, Benitez FG (1995) On the functional form of the speed-density relationship—I: General theory. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 29(5):373–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drake J, Schofer J, May A (1967) A statistical analysis of speed density hypotheses. Highway Res. Record 154:53–87.Google Scholar
• Forbes T (1963) Human factor considerations in traffic flow theory. Highway Res. Record 15:60–66.Google Scholar
• Forbes T, Simpson M (1968) Driver and vehicle response in freeway deceleration waves. Transportation Sci. 2(1):77–104.Link, Google Scholar
• Forbes T, Zagorski H, Holshouser E, Deterline WA (1958) Measurement of driver reaction to tunnel conditions. Proc. Highway Res. Board 37:345–357.Google Scholar
• Gartner N, Messer CJ, Rathi AK (2001) Revised monograph of traffic flow theory: A state-of-the-art report. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/tft/.Google Scholar
• Gazis DC, Herman R, Rothery RW (1961) Non-linear follow the leader models of traffic flow. Oper. Res. 9(4):545–567.Link, Google Scholar
• Gipps P (1981) A behavioral car following model for computer simulation. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 15:105–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg H (1959) An analysis of traffic flow. Oper. Res. 7(1):79–85.Link, Google Scholar
• Greenshields B (1934) A study of traffic capacity. Proc. Highway Res. Board 14:448–477.Google Scholar
• HCM (1950) Highway Capacity Manual. Bureau of Public Roads, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• HCM (2000) Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Helbing D, Hennecke A, Shvetsov V, Treiber M (2002) Micro- and macro-simulation of freeway traffic. Math. Comput. Model. 35(5):517–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hugoniot H (1887) Sur la propagation du mouvement dans les corps et spécialement dans les gaz parfaits (première partie). J. de l’Ecole Polytechnique 57:3–97.Google Scholar
• Koshi M, Iwasaki M, Ohkura I (1983) Some findings and an overview on vehicular flow characteristics. Hurdle VF, Hauer E, Stewart GN, eds. 8th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Flow Theory (University of Toronto Press, Toronto), 403–426.Google Scholar
• Newell G (1993) A simplified theory on kinematic waves in highway traffic, part II: Queueing at freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 27(4):289–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell GF (1961) Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following. Oper. Res. 9(2):209–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Ni D (2011a) A unified perspective on traffic flow theory, part I: The field theory. Yin Y, Wang Y, Lu J, Wang W, eds. Proceedings ASCE-ICCTP 2011 (ASCE, Nanjing, China), 4227–4243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ni D (2011b) A unified perspective on traffic flow theory, part II: The unified diagram. Yin Y, Wang Y, Lu J, Wang W, eds. Proceedings ASCE-ICCTP 2011 (ASCE, Nanjing, China), 4244–4263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ni D (2011c) Multiscale modeling of traffic flow. Math. Aeterna 1(1):27–54.Google Scholar
• Ni D, Zhang C, Wang H (2011) A unified perspective on traffic flow theory, part III: Validation and benchmarking. Yin Y, Wang Y, Lu J, Wang W, eds. Proceedings ASCE-ICCTP 2011 (ASCE, Nanjing, China), 4264–4286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pipes LA (1953) An operational analysis of traffic dynamics. J. Appl. Phys. 24:271–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rakha H (2009) Validation of Van Aerde’s simplified steadystate car-following and traffic stream model. Transportation Lett. Internat. J. Transportation Res. 1(3):227–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rakha H, Arafeh M (2010) Calibrating steady-state traffic stream and car-following models using loop detector data. Transportation Sci. 44(2):151–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Rankine WJM (1870) On the thermodynamic theory of waves of finite longitudinal disturbances. Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. 160:277–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treiber M, Kesting A (2013) Traffic Flow Dynamics (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D (2000) Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E 62:1805–1824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Underwood R (1961) Speed, volume and density relationships. Quality and Theory of Traffic Flow Report, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Van Aerde M (1995) Single regime speed-flow-density relationship for congested and uncongested highways. Presented at the 74th Transportation Res. Board (TRB) Annual Meeting, Paper 950802, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Van Aerde M, Rakha H (1995) Multivariate calibration of single regime speed-flow-density relationships. Proceedings 6th 1995 Vehicle Navigation Information Systems Conference (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 334–341.Google Scholar
• Wang H, Ni D, Chen Q-Y, Li J (2013) Stochastic modeling of equilibrium speed-density relationship. J. Adv. Transportation 47(1):126–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitham G (1974) Linear and Nonlinear Waves (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar