A Dynamic Spatial Price Equilibrium Model of Integrated Urban Production-Transportation Operations Considering Freight Delivery Tours

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0616

References

  • Ahuja RK, Magnanti TL, Orlin JB (1993) Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Alcada-Almeida L, Tralhao L, Santos L, Coutinho-Rodrigues J (2009) A multiobjective approach to locate emergency shelters and identify evacuation routes in urban areas. Geographical Anal. 41(1):9–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ambrosini C, Routhier JL (2004) Objectives, methods and results of surveys carried out in the field of urban freight transport: An international comparison. Transport Rev. 24(1):57–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asian Development Bank (2011) Parking Policy in Asian Cities (Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines). Accessed September 1, 2012, http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28935/parking-policy-asia.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Barbarosoglu G, Ozgur D (1999) A tabu search algorithm for the vehicle routing problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 26(3):255–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batten D, Johansson B (1985) Price adjustments and multiregional rigidities in the analysis of world trade. Papers Regional Sci. 56(1):145–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beamon BM (1999) Measuring supply chain performance. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 19(3):275–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boerkamps J, Binsbergen AV (1999) GoodTrip—A New Approach for Modelling and Evaluation of Urban Goods Distribution (City Logistics I, Cairns, Australia).Google Scholar
  • Caunhye AM, Nie X, Pokharel S (2012) Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. 46(1):4–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chao GS, Friesz TL (1984) Spatial price equilibrium sensitivity analysis. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 18(6):423–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cordeau JF, Gendreau M, Laporte G, Potvin JY, Semet F (2002) A guide to vehicle routing heuristics. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53(5):512–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dafermos SC, Nagurney A (1984) Sensitivity analysis for the general spatial economic equilibrium problem. Oper. Res. 32(5): 1069–1086.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis DD, Holt CA (1993) Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • De Jong G, Gunn H, Walker W (2004) National and international freight transport models: Overview and ideas for future development. Transport Rev. 24(1):103–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doerner KF, Gutjahr WJ, Nolz PC (2009) Multi-criteria location planning for public facilities in tsunami-prone coastal areas. OR Spectrum 31(3):651–687.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donnelly R (2007) A hybrid microsimulation model of freight flows. Taniguchi E, Thompson RG, eds. Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. City Logist. (Institute for City Logistics, Crete, Greece), 235–246.Google Scholar
  • Doyen A, Aras N, Barbarosoglu G (2012) A two-echelon stochastic facility location model for humanitarian relief logistics. Optim. Lett. 6(6):1123–1145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunne T, Roberts MJ, Samuelson L (1988) Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. manufacturing industries. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):495–515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernández LJE, De Cea Ch J, Soto AO (2003) A multi-modal supply-demand equilibrium model for predicting intercity freight flows. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 37(7):615–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiedrich F, Gehbauer F, Rickers U (2000) Optimized resource allocation for emergency response after earthquake disasters. Safety Sci. 35(1–3):41–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman D, Sunder S (1994) Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedrich M, Haupt T, Noekel K (2003) Freight modeling: Data issues, survey methods, demand and network models. 10th Annual Internat. Conf. Travel Behav. Res., Lucerne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  • Friesz T, Gottfried JA, Morlok EK (1986) A sequential shipper-carrier network model for predicting freight flows. Transportation Sci. 20(2):80–91.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Friesz TL, Holguín-Veras J (2005) Dynamic game-theoretic models of urban freight—Formulation and solution approach. Reggiani A, Schintler LA, eds. Methods and Models in Transport and Telecommunications—Cross Atlantic Perspectives (Springer, Berlin), 143–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friesz TL, Viton P (1982) Economic and Computational Aspects of Freight Network Equilibrium Models: A Synthesis (Department of Regional Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Friesz TL, Rigdon MA, Mookherjee R (2006) Differential variational inequalities and shipper dynamic oligopolistic network competition. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 40(6):480–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (W.H. Freeman and Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Garrido RA, Mahmassani HS (2000) Forecasting freight transportation demand with the space-time multinomial probit model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 34(5):403–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gillett BE, Miller LR (1974) A heuristic algorithm for the vehicle-dispatch problem. Oper. Res. 22(2):340–349.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gliebe J, Cohen O, Hunt JD (2007) Dynamic choice model of urban commercial activity patterns of vehicles and people. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2003:17–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haghani A, Oh SC (1996) Formulation and solution of a multi-commodity, multi-modal network flow model for disaster relief operations. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 30(3): 231–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ham H, Kim TJ, Boyce D (2005) Implementation and estimation of a combined model of interregional, multimodal commodity shipments and transportation network flows. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(1):65–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harker PT (1988) Dispersed spatial price equilibrium. Environment Planning A 20(3):353–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harker PT, Friesz TL (1986a) Prediction of intercity freight flows, I: Theory. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 20(2):139–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harker PT, Friesz TL (1986b) Prediction of intercity freight flows, II: Mathematical formulations. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 20(2):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hensher DA (2007) Models of organizational and agency choices for passenger- and freight-related travel: Notions of interactivity and influence. Axhausen KW, ed. Moving Through Nets: The Physical and Social Dimensions of Travel (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 107–130.Google Scholar
  • Hensher DA, Puckett SM (2005) Refocusing the modelling of freight distribution: Development of an economic-based framework to evaluate supply chain behaviour in response to congestion charging. Transportation 32(6):573–602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J (2000) A framework for an integrative freight market simulation. IEEE 3rd Annual Intelligent Transportation Systems Conf. ITSC-2000 (IEEE, Dearborn, MI), 476–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Aros-Vera F (2015) Self-supported freight demand management: Pricing and incentives. Eur. J. Transportation Logist. 4(2):237–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Jara-Díaz S (1999) Optimal space allocation and pricing for priority service at container ports. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 33(2):81–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Patil G (2005) Observed trip chain behavior of commercial vehicles. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1906:74–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Patil G (2008) A multicommodity integrated freight origin-destination synthesis model. Networks Spatial Econom. 8(2):309–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Thorson E (2000) An investigation of the relationship between the trip length distributions in commodity-based and trip-based freight demand modeling. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1707:37–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Thorson E (2003a) Modeling commercial vehicle empty trips with a first order trip chain model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 37(2):129–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Thorson E (2003b) Practical implications of modeling commercial vehicle empty trips. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1833:87–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Thorson E, Ozbay K (2004) Preliminary results of experimental economics application to urban goods modeling research. Transportation Res. Record 1873(1):9–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Zorrilla JC, Thorson E (2005) Modeling commercial vehicle empty trips: Theory and application. Mahmassani H, ed. XVI Internat. Sympos. Transportation Theory and Traffic (ISTTT) (Elsevier, New York), 585–608.Google Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Xu N, De Jong G, Maurer H (2011) An experimental economics investigation of shipper-carrier interactions on the choice of mode and shipment size in freight transport. Networks Spatial Econom. 11(3):509–532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Jaller M, Wassenhove LV, Perez N, Wachtendorf T (2012a) Material convergence: An important and understudied disaster phenomenon. Nat. Hazards Rev. 15:1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holguín-Veras J, Jaller M, Sanchez-Díaz I, Wojtowicz JM, Campbell S, Levinson HS, Lawson CT, Powers E, Tavasszy L (2012b) Freight trip generation and land use. NCHRP Report 739/NCFRP Report 19, National Cooperative Highway Research Program/National Cooperative Freight Research Program, Washington, DC, http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_739.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Hunt JD, Stefan KJ (2007) Tour-based microsimulation of urban commercial movements. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 41(9):981–1013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inaba FS, Wallace NE (1989) Spatial price competition and the demand for freight transportation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 71(4):614–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karakaya F, Stahl MJ (1989) Barriers to entry and market entry decisions in consumer and industrial goods markets. J. Marketing 53(2):80–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Labys WC, Yang CW (1997) Spatial price equilibrium as a foundation to unified spatial commodity modeling. Papers Regional Sci. 76(2):199–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liberatore F, Ortuno MT, Tirado G, Vitoriano B, Scaparra MP (2014) A hierarchical compromise model for the joint optimization of recovery operations and distribution of emergency goods in humanitarian logistics. Comput. Oper. Res. 42:3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liew CK, Shim JK (1978) A spatial equilibrium model: Another view. J. Urban Econom. 5(4):526–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin S (1965) Computer solution of the traveling salesman problem. Bell System Tech. J. 44(5):2245–2269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas-Colell A, Whinston M, Green J (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Nagurney A (2010) Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Nagurney A, Dong J (2002) Supernetworks: Decision-Making for the Information Age (Edward Elgar Publishing Inc., Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
  • Nash J (1951) Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 54(2):286–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noortman HJ (1984) Goods distribution systems in urban areas. 61st Roundtable on Transport Econom. Eur. Conf. Ministers of Transport. (OECD, Paris), 6–64.Google Scholar
  • Ogden KW (1978) The distribution of truck trips and commodity flow in urban areas: A gravity model analysis. Transportation Res. 12(2):131–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ogden KW (1992) Urban Goods Movement: A Guide to Policy and Planning (Ashgate Publishing Company, Brookfield, VT).Google Scholar
  • Ortúzar JD, Willumsen LG (2011) Modelling Transport (John Wiley and Sons, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prince T (2008) Deconstructing deregulation. J. Commerce, http://www.joc.com/deconstructing-deregulation_20080302.html.Google Scholar
  • Raothanachonkun P, Sano K, Wisetjindawat W (2007) Estimating truck trip origin-destination with commodity-based and empty trip models. Transportation Res. Record 2008:43–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts PO, Kullman BC (1979) Urban goods movement—Be-havioural demand-forecasting procedures. Hensher DA, Stopher PR, eds. Behavioural Travel Modelling (Croon Helm, London), 553–576.Google Scholar
  • Roorda MJ, Cavalcante R, McCabe S, Kwan H (2010) A conceptual framework for agent-based modelling of logistics services. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 46(1):18–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy JR (1990) A dispersed equilibrium commodity trade model. Ann. Regional Sci. 24(1):13–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samimi A, Mohammadian A, Kawamura K (2010) A behavioral freight movement microsimulation model: Method and data. Transportation Lett.: Internat. J. Transportation Res. 2(1):53–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson PA (1952) Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. Amer. Econom. Rev. 42(3):283–303.Google Scholar
  • Sheffi Y (1984) Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Silas MA, Holguín-Veras J (2009) Behavioral microsimulation formulation for analysis and design of off-hour delivery policies in urban areas. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2097:43–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith VL (1963) Minimization of economic rent in spatial price equilibrium. Rev. Econom. Stud. 30(1):24–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith VL (1976) Experimental economics: Induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(2):274–279.Google Scholar
  • Stefan K, McMillan J, Hunt J (2005) Urban commercial vehicle movement model for Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1921:1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takayama T, Judge GG (1964) Equilibrium among spatially separated markets: A reformulation. Econometrica: J. Econometric Soc. 32(2):510–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takayama T, Judge GG (1970) Alternative spatial equilibrium models. J. Regional Sci. 10(1):1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tamin OZ, Willumsen LG (1989) Transport demand model estimation from traffic counts. Transportation 16(1):3–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tavasszy LA, Ruijgrok K, Davydenko I (2012) Incorporating logistics in freight transport demand models: State-of-the-art and research opportunities. Transport Rev. 32(2):203–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thorson E (2005) The integrative freight market simulation: An application of experimental economics and algorithmic solutions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.Google Scholar
  • van Duin JHR, Tavasszy LA, Taniguchi E (2007) Real time simulation of auctioning and re-scheduling processes in hybrid freight markets. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 41(9):1050–1066.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H (1992) Microeconomic Analysis (Norton, New York).Google Scholar
  • Walras L (1954) Elements of Pure Economics or the Theory of Social Wealth (A Transl. of the Éd. Définitive, 1926, of the Eléments D’économie Politique Pure, annotated and collated with the previous editions) (George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London).Google Scholar
  • Wang Q (2008) Tour based urban freight travel demand models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.Google Scholar
  • Wang Q, Holguín-Veras J (2008) Investigation of attributes determining trip chaining behavior in hybrid microsimulation urban freight models. Transportation Res. Record 2066:1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson AG (1967) A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Res. 1(3):253–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson AG (1969) The use of entropy maximising models in the theory of trip distribution, mode split and route split. J. Transport Econom. Policy 3(1):108–126.Google Scholar
  • Wilson AG (1970a) Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling (Pion Ltd., London).Google Scholar
  • Wilson AG (1970b) The use of the concept of entropy in system modelling. Oper. Res. Quart. 21(2):247–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson AG (1974) Urban and Regional Models in Geography and Planning (John Wiley and Sons, London).Google Scholar
  • Wilson AG (1979) Equilibrium and transport system dynamics. Hensher DA, Stopher PR, eds. Behaviour Travel Modelling (Croon Helm, London), 164–186.Google Scholar
  • Wisetjindawat W, Sano K, Matsumoto S, Raothanachonkun P (2007) Micro-simulation model for modeling freight agents interactions in urban freight movement. 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Res. Board, Washington, DC, 21–25.Google Scholar
  • Xu N (2008) A dynamic model of integrated production-transportation operations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.Google Scholar
  • Xu N, Holguín-Veras J (2009) A dynamic model of integrated production-transportation operations. Annual Meeting of the Transportation Res. Board, No. 09-1283.Google Scholar
  • Yamada T, Imai K, Nakamura T, Taniguchi E (2011) A supply chain-transport supernetwork equilibrium model with the behaviour of freight carriers. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 47(6):887–907.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.