Worst-Case Conditional Value-at-Risk Minimization for Hazardous Materials Transportation

References

• Akgun V, Parekh A, Batta R, Rump C (2007) Routing of a hazmat truck in the presence of weather systems. Comput. Oper. Res. 34(5):1351–1373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Androutsopoulos KN, Zografos KG (2012) A bi-objective time-dependent vehicle routing and scheduling problem for hazardous materials distribution. Eur. J. Transportation Logist. 1(1–2):157–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batta R, Chiu SS (1988) Optimal obnoxious paths on a network: Transportation of hazardous materials. Oper. Res. 36(1):84–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell MGH (2007) Mixed routing strategies for hazardous materials: Decision-making under complete uncertainty. Internat. J. Sustainable Transportation 1(2):133–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Sim M (2003) Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Math. Programming 98(1):49–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carotenuto P, Giordani S, Ricciardelli S (2007) Finding minimum and equitable risk routes for hazmat shipments. Comput. Oper. Res. 34(5):1304–1327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Čerbáková J (2006) Worst-case VaR and CVaR. Haasis HD, Kopfer H, Schönberger J, eds. Oper. Res. Proc. 2005 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg), 817–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaerani D, Roos C, Aman A (2005) The robust shortest path problem by means of robust linear optimization. Fleuren H, den Hertog D, Kort P, eds. Oper. Res. Proc. 2004 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg), 335–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang T, Nozick L, Turnquist M (2005) Multiobjective path finding in stochastic dynamic networks, with application to routing hazardous materials shipments. Transportation Sci. 39(3):383–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen A, Zhou Z (2010) The α—Reliable mean-excess traffic equilibrium model with stochastic travel times. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 44(4):493–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Pan J (1997) An overview of value at risk. J. Derivatives 4(3):7–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn D (2008) Private profits and socialized risk. Global Assoc. Risk Professionals Risk Rev. 42(June–July):10–18.Google Scholar
• El Ghaoui L, Oks M, Oustry F (2003) Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: A conic programming approach. Oper. Res. 51(4):543–556.Link, Google Scholar
• Emergency Response Guidebook (2012) 2012 Emergency Response Guidebook: A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident. U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Washington, DC, http://phmsa.dot.gov/pv_obj_cache/pv_obj_id_7410989F4294AE44A2EBF6A80ADB640BCA8E4200/filename/ERG2012.pdf.Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Ingolfsson A (2005) Transport risk models for hazardous materials: Revisited. Oper. Res. Lett. 33(1):81–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Verter V (1998) Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Oper. Res. 46(5):625–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Tjandra S, Verter V (2007) Hazardous materials transportation. Barnhart C, Laporte G, eds. Transportation, Handbooks Oper. Res. Management Sci., Vol. 14 (North Holland, Amsterdam), 539–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2001) Final report: Comparative risks of hazardous materials and non-hazardous materials truck shipment accidents/incidents. Washington, DC, http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/staticfiles/PHMSA/DownloadableFiles/Files/hazmatriskfinalreport.pdf.Google Scholar
• Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2007) Appendix B: Final report: Designation of highway routes for hazardous materials shipments: Literature review. The Hazardous Materials Highway Routing Route Plan Guidance, Report to Congress, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/sites/fmcsa.dot.gov/files/docs/HM-Highway-Routing-Route-Plan-Guidance-Report-and-Appendices-FINAL-March-2009.pdf.Google Scholar
• Floudas CA, Visweswaran V (1994) Quadratic optimization. Horst R, Pardalos PM, eds. Handbook of Global Optimization (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 217–270.Google Scholar
• Jin H, Batta R (1997) Objectives derived from viewing hazmat shipments as a sequence of independent Bernoulli trials. Transportation Sci. 31(3):252–261.Link, Google Scholar
• Kang Y, Batta R, Kwon C (2014a) Value at risk model for hazardous material transportation. Ann. Oper. Res. 222(1):361–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang Y, Batta R, Kwon C (2014b) Generalized route planning model for hazardous material transportation with VaR and equity considerations. Comput. Oper. Res. 43:237–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouvelis P, Yu G (1997) Robust Discrete Optimization and Its Applications (Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications) (Springer, Science + Business Media, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon C, Lee T, Berglund P (2013) Robust shortest path problems with two uncertain multiplicative cost coefficients. Naval Res. Logist. 60(5):375–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linsmeier T, Pearson N (2000) Value at risk. Financial Analysts J. 56(2):47–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller-Hooks E, Mahmassani H (1998) Optimal routing of hazardous materials in stochastic, time-varying transportation networks. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1645(1):143–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nocera J (2009) Risk mismanagement. New York Times Magazine (January 4), MM24. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/magazine/04risk-t.html.Google Scholar
• Pflug G (2000) Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (2013) Glossary. Washington, DC, http://phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/glossary.Google Scholar
• Rockafellar R, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Banking Finance 26(7):1443–1471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2(3):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarykalin S, Serraino G, Uryasev S (2008) Value-at-risk vs. conditional value-at-risk in risk management and optimization. Chen Z-L, Raghavan S, eds. Tutorials in Operations Research (INFORMS, Hanover, MD), 270–294.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaver D, Kaiser M (1998) Criteria for highway routing of hazardous materials. Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Sherali H, Brizendine L, Glickman T, Subramanian S (1997) Low probability–high consequence considerations in routing hazardous material shipments. Transportation Sci. 31(3):237–251.Link, Google Scholar
• Toumazis I, Kwon C (2013) Routing hazardous materials on time-dependent networks using conditional value-at-risk. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 37:73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toumazis I, Kwon C, Batta R (2013) Value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk minimization for hazardous materials routing. Batta R, Kwon C, eds. Handbook of OR/MS Models in Hazardous Materials Transportation, Internat. Series Oper. Res. Management Sci., Vol. 193 (Springer, New York), 127–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2007) United States: 2007, hazardous materials transportation—Commodity flow survey. http://www.bts.gov/programs/commodity_flow_survey.Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2010) Interactive population map. http://www.census.gov/2010census.Google Scholar
• Waller T, Ziliaskopoulos A (2006) A chance-constrained based stochastic dynamic traffic assignment model: Analysis, formulation and solution algorithms. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 14(6):418–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu X, Nie YM (2011) Modeling heterogeneous risk-taking behavior in route choice: A stochastic dominance approach. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 45(9):896–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Fukushima M (2009) Worst-case conditional value-at-risk with application to robust portfolio management. Oper. Res. 57(5):1155–1168.Link, Google Scholar
• Zografos K, Androutsopoulos K (2008) A decision support system for integrated hazardous materials routing and emergency response decisions. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 16(6):684–703.Crossref, Google Scholar