Cellular Automaton Model with Dynamical 2D Speed-Gap Relation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0667

References

  • Appert-Rolland C, Du Boisberranger J (2013) Macroscopic relaxation after on-ramps in real data and in cellular automata simulations. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 34(9):162–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bando M, Hasebe K, Nakayama A, Shibata A, Sugiyama Y (1995) Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Physical Rev. E 51:1035–1042.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockfeld E, Kühne RD, Wagner P (2004) Calibration and validation of microscopic traffic flow models. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1876(1):62–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockfeld E, Kühne RD, Wagner P (2005) Calibration and validation of microscopic models of traffic flow. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1934(1):179–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chowdhury D, Santen L, Schadschneider A (2000) Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems. Physics Reports 329(4):199–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daganzo CF, Cassidy MJ, Bertini RL (1999) Possible explanations of phase transitions in highway traffic. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 33(5):365–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DLR (2007) Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt. Accessed May 2013, http://www.dlr.de/cs/DesktopDefault.aspx/1177_read-2160/.Google Scholar
  • Guo MM, Wu Z (2013) The phenomenon of high-speed-car-following on Chinese highways. Zhou Z-W, ed. 6th Internat. Conf. Nonlinear Mechanics (Destech Publications, Lancaster, PA), 536–539.Google Scholar
  • Guo MM, Yin KH, Wu Z, Xu Q (2015) Survey report on traffic flow of several intercity highways in China (in Chinese). Technical report, http://traflow.fudan.edu.cn/refer.html.Google Scholar
  • Hafstein S, Chrobok R, Pottmeier A, Schreckenberg M, Mazur FC (2004) A high resolution cellular automata traffic simulation model with application in a freeway traffic information system. Comput. Aided Civil Infrastructure Engrg. 19(5):338–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D (2001) Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Reviews Modern Physics 73(4):1067–1141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helbing D, Treiber M, Kesting A, Schönhof M (2009) Theoretical vs. empirical classification and prediction of congested traffic states. Eur. Physical J. B: Condensed Matter Complex Systems 69(4):583–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang R, Wu QS (2003) Cellular automata models for synchronized traffic flow. J. Physics A: Math. General 36(2):381–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang R, Wu QS, Zhu ZJ (2001) Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory. Physical Rev. E 64(1):Article 017101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang R, Hu MB, Zhang HM, Gao ZY, Jia B, Wu QS, Wang B, Yang M (2014) Traffic experiment reveals the nature of car-following. PLoS One 9(4):Article e94351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin CJ, Wang W, Jiang R, Zhang HM, Wang H (2013) Spontaneous phase transition from free flow to synchronized flow in traffic on a single-lane highway. Physical Rev. E 87(1):Article 012815.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin WL (2014) Analysis of kinematic waves arising in diverging traffic flow models. Transportation Sci. 49(1):28–45.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS (1998) Experimental features of self-organization in traffic flow. Physical Rev. Lett. 81(17):3797–3800.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS (2000) Experimental features of the emergence of moving jams in free traffic flow. J. Physics A: Math. General 33(26):L221–L228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS (2004) The Physics of Traffic: Empirical Freeway Pattern Features, Engineering Applications, and Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS (2009) Introduction to Modern Traffic Flow Theory and Control: The Long Road to Three-Phase Traffic Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS (2012) Complexity of spatiotemporal traffic phenomena in flow of identical drivers: Explanation based on fundamental hypothesis of three-phase theory. Physical Rev. E 85(3):Article 036110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS (2013) Criticism of generally accepted fundamentals and methodologies of traffic and transportation theory: A brief review. Physica A: Statist. Mech. Appl. 392(21):5261–5282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS, Klenov SL (2002) A microscopic model for phase transitions in traffic flow. J. Physics A: Math. General 35(3):L31–L34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS, Klenov SL (2006) Deterministic microscopic three-phase traffic flow models. J. Physics A: Math. General 39(8):1775–1809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS, Rehborn H (1996a) Experimental properties of complexity in traffic flow. Physical Rev. E 53(5):R4275–R4278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS, Rehborn H (1996b) Experimental features and characteristics of traffic jams. Physical Rev. E 53(2):R1297–R1300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS, Rehborn H (1997) Experimental properties of phase transitions in traffic flow. Physical Rev. Lett. 79(20):4030–4033.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS, Klenov SL, Schreckenberg M (2011) Simple cellular automaton model for traffic breakdown, highway capacity, and synchronized flow. Physical Rev. E 84(4):Article 046110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS, Klenov SL, Schreckenberg M (2014) Probabilistic physical characteristics of phase transitions at highway bottlenecks: Incommensurability of three-phase and two-phase traffic-flow theories. Physical Rev. E 89(5):Article 052807.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerner BS, Klenov SL, Wolf DE (2002) Cellular automata approach to three-phase traffic theory. J. Physics A: Math. General 35(47):9971–10014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kesting A, Treiber M (2008) Calibrating car-following models by using trajectory data: Methodological study. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 2088(1):148–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knorr F, Schreckenberg M (2012) Influence of inter-vehicle communication on peak hour traffic flow. Physica A: Statist. Mech. Appl. 391(6):2225–2231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knospe W, Santen L, Schadschneider A, Schreckenberg M (2000) Towards a realistic microscopic description of highway traffic. J. Physics A: Math. General 33(48):L477–L485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knospe W, Santen L, Schadschneider A, Schreckenberg M (2004) Empirical test for cellular automaton models of traffic flow. Physical Rev. E 70(1):Article 016115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laval JA (2011) Hysteresis in traffic flow revisited: An improved measurement method. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 45(2):385–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mallikarjuna C, Rao KR (2009) Cellular automata model for heterogeneous traffic. J. Advanced Transportation 43(3):321–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meng Q, Weng J (2011) An improved cellular automata model for heterogeneous work zone traffic. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 19(6):1263–1275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagatani T (2002) The physics of traffic jams. Reports Progress Physics 65(9):1331–1386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagel K, Schreckenberg M (1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J. De Physique I 2(12):2221–2229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagel K, Wagner P, Woesler R (2003) Still flowing: Approaches to traffic flow and traffic jam modeling. Oper. Res. 51(5):681–710.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • NGSIM (2006) Next generation simulation. Accessed February 2013, http://ngsim.fhwa.dot.gov/.Google Scholar
  • Punzo V, Simonelli F (2005) Analysis and comparison of microscopic traffic flow models with real traffic microscopic data. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1934(1):53–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranjitkar P, Nakatsuji T, Asano M (2004) Performance evaluation of microscopic traffic flow models with test track data. Transportation Res. Record: J. Transportation Res. Board 1876(1):90–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rehborn H, Klenov SL, Palmer J (2011) An empirical study of common traffic congestion features based on traffic data measured in the USA, the UK, and Germany. Physica A 390(23):4466–4485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schönhof M, Helbing D (2007) Empirical features of congested traffic states and their implications for traffic modeling. Transportation Sci. 41(2):135–166.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schönhof M, Helbing D (2009) Criticism of three-phase traffic theory. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 43(7):784–797.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun D, Elefteriadou L (2012) A driver behavior-based lane-changing model for urban arterial streets. Transportation Sci. 48(2):184–205.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tian JF, Jia N, Zhu N, Jia B, Yuan ZZ (2014) Brake light cellular automaton model with advanced randomization for traffic breakdown. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 44:282–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treiber M, Kesting A (2013) Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D (2000) Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Physical Rev. E 62(2):1805–1824.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treiber M, Kesting A, Helbing D (2010) Three-phase traffic theory and two-phase models with a fundamental diagram in the light of empirical stylized facts. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 44(8):983–1000.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner P (2010) Fluid-dynamical and microscopic description of traffic flow: A data-driven comparison. Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. A: Math. Physical Engrg. Sci. 368(1928):4481–4495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng Z (2014) Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 60:16–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.