Traffic Dynamics of Bicycle Flow: Experiment and Modeling

References

• Allen DP, Hummer JE, Rouphail EM, Milazzo JS (1998) Effect of bicycles on capacity of signalized intersections. Transportation Res. Record 1646:87–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen-Munley C, Daniel J, Dhar S (2004) Logistic model for rating urban bicycle route safety. Transportation Res. Record 1878:107–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlovic R, Santen L, Schadschneider A, Schreckenberg M (1998) Metastable states in cellular automata for traffic flow. Eur. Phys. J. B 5:793–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blue VJ, Adler JL (2001) Cellular automata microsimulation for modeling bi-directional pedestrian walkways. Transportation Res. Part B 35:293–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botma H (1995) Method to determine level of service for bicycle paths and pedestrian-bicycle paths. Transportation Res. Record 1502:38–44.Google Scholar
• Botma H, Papendrecht H (1991) Traffic operation of bicycle traffic. Transportation Res. Record 1320:65–72.Google Scholar
• Burstedde C, Klauck K, Schadschneider A, Zittartz J (2001) Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two-dimensional cellular automaton. Physica A 295:507–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chowdhury D, Santen L, Schadschneider A (2000) Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems. Phys. Rep. 329:199–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung K, Rudjanakanoknad J, Cassidy MJ (2007) Relation between traffic density and capacity drop at three freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Res. Part B 41:82–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dozza M, Werneke J (2014) Introducing naturalistic cycling data: What factors influence bicyclists’ safety in the real world? Transportation Res. Part F 24:83–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elias A (2011) Automobile-oriented or complete street? Pedestrian and bicycle level of service in the new multimodal paradigm. Transportation Res. Record 2257:80–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatersleben B, Appleton KM (2007) Contemplating cycling to work: Attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transportation Res. Part A 41:302–312.Google Scholar
• Gould G, Karner A (2009) Modeling bicycle facility operation cellular automaton approach. Transportation Res. Record 2140:157–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinen E, Van Wee B, Maat K (2010) Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Rev. 30:59–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helbing D (2001) Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73:1067–1141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helbing D, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407:487–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helbing D, Hennecke A, Treiber M (1999) Phase diagram of traffic states in the presence of inhomogeneities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82:4360–4363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helbing D, Buzna L, Johansson A, Werner T (2005) Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experiments, simulations, and design solutions. Transportation Sci. 39:1–24.Link, Google Scholar
• Highway Capacity Manual (2000) Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Homburger WS (1976) Capacity of bus routes and of pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn SP, Daamen W (2005) Pedestrian behavior at bottlenecks. Transportation Sci. 39:147–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen SU (2007) Pedestrian and bicyclist level of service on roadway segments. Transportation Res. Record 2031:43–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia B, Li XG, Jiang R, Gao ZY (2007) Multi-value cellular automata model for mixed bicycle flow. Eur. Phys. J. B 56:247–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia SP, Peng HQ, Guo JY, Chen HB (2008) Quantitative analysis of impact of bicycles on vehicles in urban mixed traffic. J. Transportation Systems Engrg. Inform. Tech. 8:58–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Jia B, Wu QS (2004) Stochastic multi-value cellular automata models for bicycle flow. J. Phys. A 37:2063–2072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerner BS (1998) Experimental features of self-organization in traffic flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81:3797–3800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerner BS (2009) Introduction to Modern Traffic Flow Theory and Control: The Long Road to Three-Phase Traffic Theory (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerner BS (2013) Criticism of generally accepted fundamentals and methodologies of traffic and transportation theory: A brief review. Physica A 392:5261–5282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerner BS, Rehborn H (1996) Experimental properties of complexity in traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E 53:4275–4278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerner BS, Rehborn H (1997) Experimental properties of phase transitions in traffic flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79:4030–4033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis BW, Vattikuti VR, Ottenberg RM, Petritsch TA, Guttenplan M, Crider LB (2003) Intersection level of service for the bicycle through movement. Transportation Res. Record 1828:101–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li XB, Wu QS, Jiang R (2001) Cellular automaton model considering the velocity effect of a car on the successive car. Phys. Rev. E 64:Article 066128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li XG, Gao ZY, Jia B, Zhao XM (2009) Modeling the interaction between motorized vehicle and bicycle by using cellular automata model. Internat. J. Mod. Phys. C 20:209–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li XG, Gao ZY, Zhao XM, Jia B (2008) Multi-value cellular automata model for mixed non-motorized traffic flow. Acta Physica Sinica 57:4777–4785.Google Scholar
• Liu X, Shen L, Ren F (1993) Operational analysis of bicycle interchanges in Beijing, China. Transportation Res. Record 1396:18–21.Google Scholar
• Martens K (2007) Promoting bike-and-ride: The Dutch experience. Transportation Res. Part A 41:326–338.Google Scholar
• Miller RE, Ramey MR (1975) Width requirements for bikeways: A level of service approach. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
• Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Collier CW, Johnson D, Schmid TL, Weather RD (2005) Cycling and the built environment, a U.S. perspective. Transportation Res. Part D 10:245–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moussaid M, Helbing D, Theraulaz G (2011) How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:6884–6888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel K, Schreckenberg M (1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J. Phys. I (France) 2:2221–2229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel K, Wagner P, Woesler R (2003) Still flowing: Approaches to traffic flow and traffic jam modeling. Oper. Res. 51:681–710.Link, Google Scholar
• Navin FPD (1994) Bicycle traffic flow characteristics: Experimental results and comparisons. ITE J. 64:31–36.Google Scholar
• Persaud B, Yagar S, Brownlee R (1998) Exploration of the breakdown phenomenon in freeway traffic. Transportation Res. Record 1634:64–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pucher J, Buehler R (2008) Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Rev. 28:495–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pucher J, Dijkstra L (2000) Making walking and cycling safer: Lessons from Europe. Transportation Quart. 54:25–50.Google Scholar
• Pucher J, Buehler R, Seinen M (2011) Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transportation Res. Part A 45:451–475.Google Scholar
• Pucher J, Komanoff C, Schimek P (1999) Bicycling renaissance in North America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling. Transportation Res. Part A 33:625–654.Google Scholar
• Raksuntorn W, Khan SI (2003) Saturation flow rate, start-up lost time, and capacity for bicycles at signalized intersections. Transportation Res. Record 1852:105–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld P, Daniel V (2004) Determinants of bicycle use: Do municipal policies matter? Transportation Res. Part A 38:531–550.Google Scholar
• Seyfried A, Steffen B, Klingsch W, Boltes M (2005) The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited. J. Stat. Mech. Article P10002.Google Scholar
• Seyfried A, Passon O, Steffen B, Boltes M, Rupprecht T, Klingsch W (2009) New insights into pedestrian flow through bottlenecks. Transportation Sci. 43:395–406.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaheen SA, Guzman S, Zhang H (2010) Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia past, present, and future. Transportation Res. Record 2143:159–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sugiyama Y, Fukui M, Kikuchi M, Hasebe K, Nakayama A, Nishinari K, Tadaki S, Yukawa S (2008) Traffic jams without bottlenecks—Experimental evidence for the physical mechanism of the formation of a jam. New J. Phys. 10:Article 033001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor D, Davis W (1999) Review of basic research in bicycle traffic science, traffic operations, and facility design. Transportation Res. Record 1674:102–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasic J, Ruskin HJ (2012) Cellular automata simulation of traffic including cars and bicycles. Physica A 391:2720–2729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang D, Feng T, Liang C (2008) Research on bicycle conversion factors. Transportation Res. Part A 42:1129–1139.Google Scholar
• Xu KM (1992) Non-motorized transport in Shanghai. The World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Ren G, Yang R (2013) Simulation model of speed-density characteristics for mixed bicycle flow-comparison between cellular automata model and gas dynamics model. Physica A 392:5110–5118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Wang W, Li C, Li ZB, Fu PM, Hu XJ (2013) Modeling of passing events in mixed bicycle traffic with cellular automata. Transportation Res. Record 2387:26–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao XM, Jia B, Gao ZY, Jiang R (2009) Traffic interactions between m-vehicles and non m-vehicles near a bus stop. J. Transportation Engrg. 135:894–906.Crossref, Google Scholar